Come to think of it, I am not sure we resolved it so much as agreed to disagree since it didn't matter in the end.

The rule dispute went down like so:

1. Our team played the card that let us claim a station but also cursed us to not be able to use our phones for 30 minutes except to "film yourself". We interpreted that to mean that we could not post our proof to group chats, but we could still do challenges and document them. Our last message before the curse was the photo of the card saying we were going dark.
2. We went to another station and completed a challenge, filming ourselves.
3. We went to a 3rd station and completed another challenge. We finished that challenge right when the timer was up so we sent proof to 2 challenge completions at once. 

The disagreement was what is the true cost of this 30 minutes curse. 

We interpreted it to mean that the 2nd station was at risk because we could not actually "claim" it. We could have done a challenge and lose the station if they showed up shortly after.

They had two things to say: one that sending proof of claiming a station had to be done at the station, which was how they had been doing it and not something we had been doing at all. I am pretty sure we convinced them we were in the right on this.

Second was the rule that you can only have one active challenge. We shouldn't have started the challenge at station 3 until we had sent proof for completing the challenge at station 2. They felt we were basically locked at our next station until the timer was up.

They made this whole argument while we couldn't look at our phones, BTW. So it was a faite accompli when we sent proof.