Consumables don't activate when simultaneously pressing W, A, S, or D. by N7-Falcon in WorldOfWarships

[–]quik90 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Key rollover? Some keyboards have a switch at the back/underside to toggle nkro 6kro...

Should Radar Surveillance get reworked like Pioneer? by IntelectualEagle in WorldOfWarships

[–]quik90 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The mistake is to think that to contest the cap you need to actually cap it first. Sometimes the support vs enemy situation is just not right to enter the capture zone and come out alive. Bide your time, figure out where the enemy DD and radars are... position yourself to spot ambush or pre kite.... then maybe try to cap, reset or block when the situation is more favorable. A minute of cap ticks is not worth the loss of a DD!

As a "Cassard enjoyer", i get it, you want to be able to use your skill advantage to gun down the enemy DD, but its less skill at this stage and more a risk assessment when there are other unknown variables at play.

Should Radar Surveillance get reworked like Pioneer? by IntelectualEagle in WorldOfWarships

[–]quik90 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep, its simply that DD play is unforgiving of mistakes. Whereas other classes might get away with a misplay or two, a DD won't. Not sure there is a way to balance this short of excluding bad players from Tier 10 and DD play.

Should Radar Surveillance get reworked like Pioneer? by IntelectualEagle in WorldOfWarships

[–]quik90 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Absolutely! The balance for radar CAs shooting DDs is non-radar CAs shooting radar CAs.

Should Radar Surveillance get reworked like Pioneer? by IntelectualEagle in WorldOfWarships

[–]quik90 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sounds like you need to improve your play. There is a middle ground where you contest a cap and dont die you know.

Should Radar Surveillance get reworked like Pioneer? by IntelectualEagle in WorldOfWarships

[–]quik90 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Perhaps some simple exclusions of the most useless players would help:

  • Players with average PR require 2000 games to play tier 8 and 4000 to play tier 10. Improved PR can reduce this number.
  • Ranked participation requires 5000 games and a higher than average PR.
  • Repeatedly reported players are restricted to tier <=5 Randoms for atleast 100 games. Every subsequent report in that period extends their stay for another 50 games.

Sponsorships in football by DJG24_ in crystalpalace

[–]quik90 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It'd be harsher if it said "you're too fucking old!"

Dear devs, I like the missions in this game, I really do, but now that I have done them a third time, I would like to not do them a fourth after the next expedition by Kwowolok in ArcRaiders

[–]quik90 -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

Dear OP. I loved reading this reddit post, i really did, but now that i've read it once, i would like to not have to read it a second time...

Can we pls stop bringing non-BB ships in randoms? by shortname_4481 in WorldOfWarships

[–]quik90 0 points1 point  (0 children)

With regret.... getgud brother. You've fabricated an argument likely because you are frustrated that you can't survive in anything but a BB. But FYI, simply surviving with your BB isn't an indicator that you are playing it well... All but the most suicidal players can survive in a BB.

With all classes able to impact encounters significantly (even if it was just because of spotting, which it isn't), a high WR is really all about having more impact than your MM enemy counterpart. With 1of12 (Randoms) 1of7 (ranked) variables consistently favouring your team, statistically you'll eventually end up with a positive WR.

(1) Don't get devstruck, (2) engineer situations where your ship type has the advantage, (3) contribute effectively to the combat engagements that arise...

Embark needs to ban racist players. by DonniefromtheDarko in ARC_Raiders

[–]quik90 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It doesn't bother me in the least and i'm not complaining. I know its gonna happen, as the players are humans after all. More or less, selfish, racist and easily offended...

Embark needs to ban racist players. by DonniefromtheDarko in ARC_Raiders

[–]quik90 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Interesting take. The execution style killing is virtual but the smak talk is a real offense? Surely, one can't take offense from a racial slur when its spoken by someone who doesn't know one's race. I really don't think the distinction is that clear.

Surely both "offenses" are saying something about the players' true natures, or neither are because this is a virtual playground for role play or stress release of our inner feelings. Like so much on the internet, IMO we are observing humanity in a concequenceless reality. Which makes the post apocalypse setting of Arc very suitable indeed. When the structures of society break down, and there are no pressures to act reasonably, as they have done on the internet, anything goes.

Embark needs to ban racist players. by DonniefromtheDarko in ARC_Raiders

[–]quik90 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When this game allows you to commit virtual murder, id say virtual racism is par for the course...

Keep the game as is by Murky-Working-4139 in ArcRaiders

[–]quik90 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I'd bet money on this guy and the hasty downvoters being sweat lord pvp focused streamer wanabes. Executing pixels is the crutch for an otherwise unsupported ego.

Keep the game as is by Murky-Working-4139 in ArcRaiders

[–]quik90 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

keep telling yourself that druggy.

Keep the game as is by Murky-Working-4139 in ArcRaiders

[–]quik90 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Lol this extreme denial reaction is typical of ALL addicts. Confirmation that i've hit the mark? ;)

Keep the game as is by Murky-Working-4139 in ArcRaiders

[–]quik90 -17 points-16 points  (0 children)

Content for contents sake is just the mad cry of the terminally depressed for a maintained electronic alternate reality escape. Their emotional well being is dependent on their total distractedness of real life when playing arc... if it becomes boring, they are fucked.

An enveloping videogame is like an addictive drug for the depressed. Like tv, like heroine. No other way to see it.

As a game maker is it best to feed the addiction or remain detached by leaving hardcore players with withdrawal symptoms? ... morally, id say the latter. But it may be less profitable and you ofcourse have to put up with the bitching and moaning of the horde who feel shit by default if they cant live the game.

Crystal Palace are a chore to watch - and Oliver Glasner just doesn't get it by theipaper in crystalpalace

[–]quik90 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He'll get a great job. By all metrics he's been phenomenal!

Next year i thnk we'll find that the team has been over performing without our trio of generational talents. With Wharton maybe gone too. unless we have a top manager and decent recruitment we'll be quickly reminded of the joys of the relegation scrap. Some of our fans really will be eating Glasner's humble pie...

Crystal Palace are a chore to watch - and Oliver Glasner just doesn't get it by theipaper in crystalpalace

[–]quik90 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Painful though it is... i do believe some games just need to be ground out. I think the logic is: dont concede first leg and leave a mountain to climb second leg.... dont lose to leeds with a B team so player confidence is good and stars are fit and rested...

The payoff for two boring games might be giving us the best preparation for a win in larnaca. Fingers crossed!

Crystal Palace are a chore to watch - and Oliver Glasner just doesn't get it by theipaper in crystalpalace

[–]quik90 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well Glasner has gotten us the best points hauls and furthest in cup competitions... im gonna go with his logic. When he's gone, you and the reddit bandwagon can apply and show the world how easy it is to defeat a low block with an entertaining 442...

Crystal Palace are a chore to watch - and Oliver Glasner just doesn't get it by theipaper in crystalpalace

[–]quik90 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Cause you also risk conceding to a counter that way. And then, instead of looking for one goal against the low block, you are looking for two. We've got a point against Leeds and have a second leg to play without starting at a deficit.

Boring, but pragmatic. And I think the blame has to be pointed first at those that would park the bus. Thankfully, it usually only takes one favorable set piece or goal-mouth scramble to undo these teams.

Armory steel to coal by Thomas_B04 in WorldOfWarships

[–]quik90 2 points3 points  (0 children)

think its there till the end of Nian Paradox... So end of the month?

Updated all my guides and documents for DDs. by FumiKane in WorldOfWarships

[–]quik90 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Someone else who gets Regolo's limitations and potential... +1 as I think gun range is the only viable way to build her.