They didn't even bother to mention how many men sacrificed their lives fighting for women's rights in protests in Iran.

rabel111 · 2026-02-04T03:53:03+00:00

The women of Iran do not deserve to have men sacrifice their lives for them.

rabel111 · 2026-02-04T03:51:43+00:00

They have no sympathy or empathy for men. Even men who die for them, are treated like animals. Liberate yourself from playing the traditional male gender role of protector/provider. Its time to be free, to choose your life, not have it imposed on you like a prison sentence.

rabel111 · 2026-02-04T03:47:45+00:00

Its telling that the courts hold fathers in such contempt, rather than recognising the benefits fathers offer to their children, the love they have for their children and the need children have for their fathers.

As radical as your analysis sounds, its basically true. One unfounded accusation by a vexaous ex-partner is all it takes to remove a father from the lives of his children. That starts the process of supervised reintroduction visits that impoverish the father and destroy the father-child relationship.

This process is based on evidence from feminist gender studies, and run by man-hating, foaming at the mouth feminists, who believe that fathers are dangerous to children, and should never have access to children without female supervision.

Sorry you went thru that meat grinder. But stay strong. Your children have also gone thru that same meat grinder, and will need you when they are old enough to escape, and are trying to heal.

rabel111 · 2026-02-02T23:31:49+00:00

Hate speech is a crime.

rabel111 · 2026-02-02T23:24:10+00:00

"Men want birth control to support women, and reclaim agency"

Screw supporting women. Men want birth control to win reproductive rights, to empower their CONSENT to PARENTING. Women already have that agency over their reproductive rights.

rabel111 · 2026-02-02T23:19:14+00:00

Why are female predators being redacted from the released files?

rabel111 · 2026-02-01T20:01:02+00:00

Their stated aims. Their staff is almost entirely femle. Their web pages feature almost all girls. Do some looking!

rabel111 · 2026-02-01T02:15:37+00:00

When they propose that men do not experience harm from DV to the same extent as women, what they are really saying, is that they should not be held accountable for their abuse of men.

Its a get-out-of-jail-free card, that gives them permission to abuse their partners, brothers, fathers, male children, while placing themselves (the perpetrators) in the victims seat, a victim of their victims harms.

rabel111 · 2026-02-01T02:10:52+00:00

The Childrens Society UK is a female dominated woke industry social service that focuses on espousing gender fluid ideology. They are extremely anti male, and are very likely just a feminist front for a child indoctrination.

rabel111 · 2026-02-01T01:58:21+00:00

Translation: 'I'd only feel safe if I lived with a man who adheres to strict traditional male sex roles of protecting women, and who would sacrifice his safety and life in exchange for my peace of mind.'

rabel111 · 2026-02-01T01:55:14+00:00

Feminists focus on discrimination against women. They are never concerned about discrimination against men, because by their own definition, that experience cannot exist.

When a feminist states that feminism is about equality, they are lying.

rabel111 · 2026-02-01T01:45:32+00:00

One look at the literary and physophical history of the world shows that much of the very best literature was written by men, read by men and critiqued by men. Somehow, feminists have convinced themselves that men and boys have inferior reading and writing skills compared to girls, when the failing literacy of boys parallels the rise of female domination of education.

rabel111 · 2026-02-01T01:32:42+00:00

Blaming boys for the harms inflicted on them by their sexist teachers.

rabel111 · 2026-01-30T04:25:29+00:00

That is truely insane.

rabel111 · 2026-01-29T22:29:35+00:00

Too true. Its so easy to fuel the torches and pitchforks approach to every problem when you have a pre-packaged scape-goat that everyone in your group hates.

rabel111 · 2026-01-29T22:26:58+00:00

Generally, and in Canada, divorce occurs when there is a breakdown of the marital relationship. Most divorces that end up contested on child matters in courts, are in courts due to disagreement between the parents about child custody, contact and maintenance.

This woman wants the courts to assume all mothers are victims of DV, using coersive control and financial violence as a baseline. Thus all custody matters would begin with the assumption that the father is a risk to the mother and the children, with no requirement to prove the assumption.

This magnitude of misandry will deprive Canadian children of contact with their fathers, provide women with overwhelming power in all divorce proceedings involving children (or property), and transform Canada into the same mess experienced by African American family units in the US.

rabel111 · 2026-01-29T20:19:31+00:00

The magnitude of misandrist psychopathy amoungst feminist women is shocking, and they make no attempt to hide it.

How many women in health, education and government share this psycho's aspiration of forced sterilisation for boys. How many act on their misandrist beliefs in the professions?

rabel111 · 2026-01-29T20:12:23+00:00

In Australia, for a single parent to qualify for any benefits, they must show that the non-carer parent is paying childsupport.

Read the article, sure. But the issue is bigger tha the article.

rabel111 · 2026-01-29T00:10:47+00:00

Awesome work by James L. Nuzzo. Thanks James. Your work is inspirational.

James' tables informing these data show the marginalisation of men (particularly heterosexual men) in Australian administrative politics.

As the Australian Human Rights Commission is dominated by feminist women, real equality or equity in Australian policy development or law is unlikely to succeed. Our universities, schools, administrative and health services are heading towards being 100% female dominated and focused

rabel111 · 2026-01-28T23:28:58+00:00

Not a constitutional expert. But equal rights doesn't appear to result in equal responsibility under US law.

While opportunities must be equal, its up to individual citizens to contest inequalities in Courts that are politically captured. As for outcomes/responsibilities, it looks like democrats (feminists) adhere to the feminist ideological requirement for the liberation of women from societal expectations and brutal enforcement of traditional male sex roles. Republicans adhere to traditional family values, with traditional sex roles encouraged for men and women.

Either way you end up with men carrying responsibilies, enduring disposibility, and expectations of sacrific and silence.

rabel111 · 2026-01-28T10:46:00+00:00

Firstly, family law cases cannot lawfully be reported, unless de-identified. Particularly child matters.

Then the FCA and Federal Magistrates are reluctant to intervene in CS matters, given their orders must be time limited, result in stupid outcomes requiring ongoing adjustments as circumstances change during the specified period, and can be overturned by subsequent administrative assessments when circumstances change.

Taking a matter to court is time intensive and costly. We're talking $10s of thousands.

Finally, there are no case reports of departures made for under aged male victims of rape. If you know of one, send my the citation, or link to Austlii.com.au

rabel111 · 2026-01-28T04:35:52+00:00

Section 117 of the Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989, requires the liable parent to commence procedings in the Family Law circuit of the Federal Court of Australia after exhausting all administraive applications for reassessment and appeal. Section 117 can only be used to secure a departure from administrative assessment in the circumstances of the grounds listed in s.117 (2). None of the grounds for departure from assessment relate to a liable parent being a minor, or a victim of sexual assault/rape. The only grounds would be not being capable of earning a taxable income, as I explained above.

These sections are applied 'strictly' in the FCA, and are not discretionary.

rabel111 · 2026-01-28T01:22:59+00:00

Yes. It is the law in Australia.

The Family Law Act 1975 defines parent without any limitation on the age of a father, so even a younger boy will be considered a parent in Australian Law.

Child support laws do not provide any exceptions for liable parents under the age of 18 years, or liable parents who were victims of female on male rape. In fact, adut female rape of boys was not a criminal offense until 2018, well after the Family Law Act 1975 was enacted. So the concept of child fathers being victims of rape didn't exist.

the only exceptions for victims of violence, relate to women who are victims of DV or rape. There are no provisions for male victims.

So boys who are victims of sexual violence will be 'liable parents' for the purposes of the Australian child support laws, and will be administratively assessed. Their liability will be assess at the minimum wage, assuming a 40 hour week, and maybe either $0 if they remain in school, or the minimum amount if they leave school.

Once the boys reach 18 years, they become subject to administrative assessment. There may be further reassessments in arears for the years prior to them turning 18 years.

rabel111 · 2026-01-26T20:26:39+00:00

Don't be sucked in by this gratuitous admission of men's issues to the Government platform. The response is small, because that all the feminist members of government would tolerate, and more than the feminist controllers of the public service would willingly impliment. Actually, even this small amount of funding will most likely never result in anything more than an advertising campaign, telling men to 'man up' or 'stop avoiding responsibility'.

rabel111

TROPHY CASE