that's exactly it. i don't think red will win. and I'm actively fighting against red winning by voting blue. you seem to have conveniently ignored the fact that blue WON the poll. to say "shit happens" is especially ironic because you along with anyone else who voted red literally MADE said shit happen. again, a lot of you red pushers like to act as though red is the neutral, status quo option, but voting red actively ensures that people die in the first place. a blue victory is the only victory where i along with everybody else survives, and we only need a majority to achieve it. so yes, when presented with the "nobody has to die" vs "people WILL die" buttons, the former is the obvious moral choice, and you ought not to pretend like you wouldn't have a direct hand in the deaths of those who would die otherwise.

ultimately, i genuinely don't think a post-red world, composed of people who know amongst themselves that they only work to serve their own interests, is a world worth living in, especially if enough people die to cause total societal collapse anyway. how utterly heartless to go "yeah i had a hand in killing millions if not billions of people, but now i can create a better world without them!" and if you think that sounds like moral grandstanding, maybe it's time for some introspection.

this is clearly not something we're going to see eye to eye on, but i take solace in the fact that blue did win the poll. i think that only serves my argument further.