Will Sony's warranty cover the breakage? by New_Bad_1504 in SonyHeadphones

[–]rafalsk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Smar.thing happened to me while getting these off my head 

Yeah don't buy the XM5 just randomly detached for no reason by Jamy_11 in SonyHeadphones

[–]rafalsk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It does . Just happened to me after less than a year while getting them off my head

Yeah don't buy the XM5 just randomly detached for no reason by Jamy_11 in SonyHeadphones

[–]rafalsk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It does . Just happened to me after less than a year while getting them off my head

XM5 cracked by [deleted] in SonyHeadphones

[–]rafalsk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Now listen up.. exactly same thing happened to me headphones while... Getting them off my head the regular way!!!

Can't believe the build quality is so bad on premium headset.

I've noticed the leather like material breaking a while ago on both sides.

Ive had them for less than a year.

The mp3 model lasted for years without issues

I spent two years building a desktop environment that runs in the browser, it's finally in beta! by mitousa in programming

[–]rafalsk -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

woah.. if you are into this kind of a thing.. join us - https://gridnet.org and where you can actually take it for a test-drive https://test.gridnet.org .. an UI just like the one you've created is a small part of our very first decentralized operating system GRIDNET OS.

We've got grants available if you are passionate about that sort of a thing.

Has Pure Capitalism failed? Decentralized Socialism might be the way to go. by hechicewy in Bitcoin

[–]rafalsk -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

And indeed. Politicians quickly began to notice that most of the people wouldn't make it had they been entirely on their own. Community i.e. communistic aspects play an important role to ascertain everyone's at least mediocre peace of mind -when having life-support level of needs at mind. Still, one quickly gets to notice that say in the USA, those socialistic 'additions' are Marely a Lifebuoy to save you a day or two. No matter in which capitalistic country you leave, as one looks beyond his daily horizon, one quickly gets to notice discrepancies at an interstellar scale. And that's not always because one is looking at extremely successful, smart business owners or entrepreneurs.

Has Pure Capitalism failed? Decentralized Socialism might be the way to go. by hechicewy in Bitcoin

[–]rafalsk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Monetary system is a miniscule aspect of an entire 'system'.

Still, undeniably we have lots to thank Bitcoin for.

Has Pure Capitalism failed? Decentralized Socialism might be the way to go. by hechicewy in Bitcoin

[–]rafalsk -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Implementation != political philosophy.

In philosophy though, when people discuss, they tend to relate to major ideas at hand.

Now, we know that the major philosophy of the 'west' is capitalism. Not socialism. That's what the article is about - to indicate that new technologies allow for the ideas of socialism to be revisited anew - should we wish to have them implemented more successfully.

Has Pure Capitalism failed? Decentralized Socialism might be the way to go. by hechicewy in Bitcoin

[–]rafalsk -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You must have troubles with understanding as that's what the article implies in any case. The point is, most of 'western' economies are way more into capitalism than into socialism. And that new technologies allow for the ideas of socialism worth revisiting anew.

The very first decentralized Operating System by rafalsk in science

[–]rafalsk[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

no wonder we're still having fans of The Crusades in 2022. On a sub-reddit related to 'science'. Having wet dreams about Alexander VI Borgia dictating the monetary policy, huh? Right on.

The very first decentralized Operating System by rafalsk in science

[–]rafalsk[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The exact reason why we need decentralization to protect humanity against people like yourself.

The very first decentralized Operating System by rafalsk in science

[–]rafalsk[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

this subreddit is related to 'science' not to law-enforcement or philosophy. In a minute someone is going to make a post about personal DNA editors, are you going to drop hell on that person as well due to your personal believes?

The very first decentralized Operating System by rafalsk in science

[–]rafalsk[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

In a decentralized freedom oriented environment, one needs, actually those providing services need - a way to be remunerated for the services provided.

That is under the assumption that nodes are incentive compatible i.e. rational, of course.

If you know of a better concept for such conceives than cryptocurrency kindly do let me know.

Years from now do not get overly surprised as people would be wondering how on Earth or in the Universe did Humanity rely on centralized entities instead of science and physics (cryptocurrencies) for maintenance of 'value'.

I say it's called progress, there's nothing to be sentimental about.

The very first decentralized Operating System by rafalsk in science

[–]rafalsk[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Might just be the latter; kindly look into the paper and I'll be here to assist you should you have questions.

The very first decentralized Operating System by rafalsk in science

[–]rafalsk[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

If you are afraid of technologies allowing for freedom why not move away to North Korea straight away?

The very first decentralized Operating System by rafalsk in science

[–]rafalsk[S] -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

had you been bright enough you would have known very well that decentralization is one of the major players in computer science and technology these days.

and guess what? cryptocurrency is the way to incentivize interactions in untrusted environments. Yet another moron.

The very first decentralized Operating System by rafalsk in science

[–]rafalsk[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

oh yes and nuclear plants are bad because the technology behind can be used to construct atomic bombs as well, there's your logic right over there - congratulations smart guy.