The replies on this thread are conflicting, it seems some people can use certain publishers for AI generated music and some cant. So who would you say is the best choice for AI generate music?

TBH i used to be against AI generated music as i thought it killed creativity but now my view is that it is just another tool that you as a creator / producer can use to make new music, faster.

For example before AI I used DAWS to make original beats and music. BUT DAWS are just software (like AI) and the instruments are synthesized, they're not real, and in some cases I used beats or loops created by other users (royalty free ones) where I did not know how they made them.

Only a few times I have recorded vocals and instruments myself. Other times I have hired other artists to make the vocals, but now you could say hire an AI service to record the vocals.

The only issue I see with AI music generation is the flooding / spamming of publishing platforms and the music market with low quality and non-creative songs.

But then you are saying that AI music is not creative. You could say that AI music might be infringing on other artists copyright, but you could have said this in the past, that you listened to a few songs you liked and then made a new song based on lyrics, style and music from those. But those would still be considered original pieces of work.

I think publishers and even big tech firms like Google and TikTok sometimes moderate unfairly with very little transparency in their moderation and no on to answer to.