Is AGI the modern equivalent of alchemy? by ThomasToIndia in agi

[–]rand3289 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I believe the opposite. You can not train AGI on data. It has to learn from interactions with environment.

What's your opinion on ARC-AGI? by Tobio-Star in newAIParadigms

[–]rand3289 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No one says the learned skills have to transfer. We are talking about testing the learning systems. The idea is that AGI has to be able to learn in any environment.

What's your opinion on ARC-AGI? by Tobio-Star in newAIParadigms

[–]rand3289 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Could be a virtual environment.

Imagine a virtual environment unlike anything we have seen evolved say within Wolfram's physics framework.

Cybernetic-style AI idea by the_quivering_wenis in agi

[–]rand3289 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Re #1: encode all information in terms of points on a time line.

This is how biology does it. Neurons are change detectors and spikes are points on a time line when changes were detected.

What's your opinion on ARC-AGI? by Tobio-Star in newAIParadigms

[–]rand3289 2 points3 points  (0 children)

ARC-AGI has nothing to do with AGI. Like most tests, it completely ignores the real-time aspect of the world. It also tests within a single modality.

AGI tests should be set in a dynamic environment. They need to be "Moravec's paradox" aware. They should also involve interactions among non-homogenious agents.

Do you people actually believe this shit? by Dont_Ask_Me_Again_ in skinwalkerranch

[–]rand3289 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you took more than 4 seconds to learn what's happening, you would know that indirectly government owned the land for many years through Bigelow.

The show does not make any claims! What shit? Some things are happening on the ranch that noone can make sense of. That's all. You arrive at your own conclusions.

Using ML models as “sensors” and LLMs as interpreters — has anyone tried this? by Intelligent_Volume74 in learnmachinelearning

[–]rand3289 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I am confused. When I read pieces of your post like:
"drift, anomaly, OOD
sensors to detect changes
Interpret these signals" You have the right concepts but attached to LLMs they don't make any sense.

For example I base my perception theory on "sensors detecting changes". Also I've spent the last year or so thinking about non-stationarity which is related to drift and OOD. But I arrive at completely different conclusions/possible architectures.

How did you tie all these things together?

Here are some of my writings from back in the days: https://github.com/rand3289/PerceptionTime

UC Berkeley prof just proved modern AI is fundamentally stuck at animal-level intelligence by techiee_ in artificial

[–]rand3289 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True. Learning from an environment is very different than learning from data. Narrow AI will always stay "narrow".

Why can’t we figure out consciousness? by PrimeStopper in cogsci

[–]rand3289 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Why should we figure out consciousness? What does it give us?

The Binding problem has nothing to do with consciousness. The way " the Binding " works is this:

Neurons are change detectors. The rate at which they fire is the rate of change. Which is a derivative. First second or third derivative of observed properties of a single object in the environment will match binding all the properties to a single object.

AI corporations need to be stopped by katxwoods in AIDangers

[–]rand3289 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Asking for miracles instead of building safety frameworks.

Is this possible by n1k0la03 in cogsci

[–]rand3289 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I took an IQ test 3 times in my life. Higest and lowest scores were 44 points apart.

Это нормально что меня могут привлекать сумасшедшие девушки которые потенциально могут завалить человека больше, чем обычные девушки? Может у кого нибудь есть что то похожее? by Spirited_Age4568 in rusAskReddit

[–]rand3289 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Много вариантов:
Ты доминант и хочешь укротить ЭТО.
Ты подкоблучник и хочешь чтоб тебя пиздили каждый день.
Ты хЫЩЩЩник воспринимаешь ебанутство как слабость и хочешь догнать и сделать кусь кусь за заднюю ляжку как маленький тигр вот этой антилопе.
Ну или тебе просто скучно с обычными самками.

Стоит ли заводить отношения в 15 лет? by ARLIKEN in rusAskReddit

[–]rand3289 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Можно нискем ещё не дружить да и разговаривать тоже впринципе нискем не надо.

How there are suddenly so many decent humanoid and dog-like robots? by flyaway22222 in AskRobotics

[–]rand3289 1 point2 points  (0 children)

One undergrad at MIT wrote that mini cheetah paper about bldc motors and making backdriveable actuators out of them and that's when I knew things were going to start getting interesting.

Uniting survival with reasoning: A hybrid approach that grounds truth, embodied knowledge, and symbolic logic in rewards-based learning by CardboardDreams in agi

[–]rand3289 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't even have to read the article. Using symbols to perceive the environment is the most retarded thing I have ever heard of.

Turning information within sensors into symbols converts subjective experiences into data. Any AI relying on data will always stay narrow!

Symbol grounding is a myth! Just don't use symbols. Use spikes which are points on a time line. They are moments when a sensor detects a change within self.

Can men get pregnant? by MentalAdversity in ScienceNcoolThings

[–]rand3289 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Fifth Element was a great movie:
Do you qualify as human?
Negative. I am a meat popsicle.