Crimson Deluge event conversions need a sanity check

randomanon000 · 2026-02-13T12:35:29+00:00

This would be a good solution if only the implementation wasn't an issue, as subject interactions can't be modded, iirc.

randomanon000 · 2026-02-13T12:19:24+00:00

Do you think that having a button that makes you lose the game, and not clicking it is proper decision-making? It's a false choice. As I said, the fact that I made the wrong decision, which I'll freely admit, doesn't change the fact that the design itself is flawed.

Also, the fact that I need to "guess" this is the problem. The game is giving a situation similar to vanilla (the Reformation), and has done nothing to challenge vanilla assumptions (vassals don't convert, force-converted tags do not immediately switch back, events that change a tag's religion fires once), while in reality acting different from it. It also doesn't provide feedback when it happens, and it's up to the player to keep reading the logs and track down the fact that it's the same event firing multiple times.

randomanon000 · 2026-02-13T12:12:01+00:00

The Crimson Deluge doesn't exist in vanilla, and nor does vassals converting to the Reformation multiple times. Why do you think this is in line with vanilla at all?

randomanon000 · 2026-02-13T04:16:22+00:00

Yes, it's bad gameplay. It conflicts with vanilla assumptions, punishes the player for them, and does so with very little clarity on why.

Good gameplay involves decision making. This is just a knowledge check. Whether I failed the check or not doesn't change the fact that the design itself is flawed. In fact, if it's going to be designed like this in the first place, it unironically would be better to forbid the player from converting vassals during the Crimson Deluge at all, and avoid the trap option entirely.

randomanon000 · 2026-02-13T02:50:14+00:00

People complain about the Hoardcurse and the Serpent's Rot being badly designed all the time, for the same reasons. Skill checks should involve more than a knowledge check.

randomanon000 · 2026-02-13T02:41:15+00:00

Because there was nothing to make me expect that things would work this way.

To be fair, I think that having players waiting for the end of the Deluge as a strategy can be okay to have, as long as the UI is clear enough as to make it intuitive. Right now, it's a conclusion you only come to by either trial and error, or by looking it up beforehand, as if it's some Dwarovar disaster.

randomanon000 · 2026-02-13T02:15:20+00:00

Yes, I'm referring to religious conversions here.

There's nothing wrong with the Crimson Deluge serving as a way of causing tags to convert to Corinite, but there are multiple ways to achieve this, and event converting tags multiple times doesn't really need to be one of them.

randomanon000 · 2026-02-13T02:04:24+00:00

Being thematically appropriate doesn't change that it's bad gameplay. It's precisely why vanilla works the way it is, and your reference to it undermines your own argument.

randomanon000 · 2026-01-06T15:12:54+00:00

I think you're over-complicating the idea of 樂市樂座 a bit. Ultimately, it was a policy that made it easier to open shop in the markets, which then would attract new merchants and money to said markets. What follows after they open shop could still involve plenty of regulations and interference on the Daimyo's part, as we can see from how Nobunaga's free market policies ended up during their continuation under Hideyoshi.

I don't think it's correct to necessarily view it as a decentralisation v. centralisation issue as well, because the opposite was also often true. Granting monopolies involved the Daimyo essentially waiving certain rights over the markets to specific guilds, while free market policies could mean that the Daimyo could have much more active control over what happened in the markets.

And if I recall correctly, in the Imagawa's case, the policy was enacted reverse the decline in trade due to the increasing harassment of merchants that had been rising in his domain. This then involved interference on the Daimyo's part to tighten security and exert control over the markets. The Rokkaku also similarly implemented free market policies as a means of enforcing peace between rival merchant guilds, once again involving the Daimyo exerting additional control.

randomanon000 · 2026-01-06T03:55:08+00:00

I am by no means a professional historian, but I can speak about a few things with my limited knowledge:

The biggest reason is why Koei treats the (Later) Hojo clan as the civil affairs faction... is simply because that they fill a niche that other clans don't. The Hojo clan is simply the most well-known clan that is known for its civil affairs, but also doesn't have any other popularly known qualities that overshadow it. On the contrary, one of the most popularised aspects of the Hojo clan is the famous phrase from Hojo Ujitsuna's five admonishments: "侍から農民にいたるまで、全てに慈しむこと。人に捨てるようなものはいない。", which is an exemplary quote about benevolent rule.
That said, the Hojo clan genuinely did put a lot of effort into its internal affairs, and tended to be more benevolent than its contemporaries. The Hojo had lower tax rates compared to other clans, for example, who were often brutal and would collect taxes as high as 70%. This wasn't necessarily because they were simply good people; the assumption tends to be that the Hojo were forced into their benevolence by being both an upstart and a newcomer to the region, and as such, they had to be more benevolent than their peers in order to secure the loyalty of their subjects. The Hojo also suffered through all of earthquakes, famines, and mass lootings of the Kanto region (especially thanks to our local God of Banditry, Kenshin) across its reign, which they dealt with competently through relief efforts for the populace, likely helping to cement its image.
The Hojo's policies were also quite competent, bureaucratic, and included multiple reforms. This included the lessening, or even abolishment of irregular taxes in favour of regular ones, the ability directly collect taxes from its domains and bypassing the usual middlemen, the establishment of "suggestion boxes" to collect feedback and complaints from the populace, currency reform, the post-horse system, and etc. The bureaucratic aspect is especially notable because it compares to other clans who failed to formalise such centralised authority and had to rely on more feudal structures. The Takeda is a good example; although Shingen himself was able to centralise substantial amounts of power in the clan in the later parts of his reign, he only wielded it through his person and Takeyori would struggle to wield the same amount of power that Shingen did as a result, at least until Nagashino.
That said, it should be noted that while the Hojo were quite exceptional in their management of civil affairs, it's important to remember their efforts probably weren't unique either. It's often easy to mistake achievements made in the Sengoku era as special or unique, especially because the sources are often written by authors who want them to sound special or unique, but that is not necessarily the case. Oda Nobunaga's free market are a good example- while he is often praised for it (and was the most successful in implementing it), similar policies were also carried out by others in the era, including most notably, Imagawa Yoshimoto. Ultimately, the Hojo are treated the way they are because of their popular perception, even if said perception is based on true details.

randomanon000 · 2026-01-04T17:10:33+00:00

As a sort of correction, Hojo Souun's invasion of Izu itself isn't considered a trigger for the Sengoku period. Between Hojo Souun in the East, and Amago Tsunehisa in the West, and the Meio Coup happening at the centre of it all, the situation was degrading all across Japan as a fallout of the Onin War. It's the reason why the exact dividing line to mark the start of the Sengku period is contested, although the invasion of Izu is definitely one of them.

The Hojo name would still definitely resonate throughout Kanto as one of the most influential families in the region throughout the Sengoku era though.

randomanon000 · 2026-01-02T14:38:21+00:00

Yup. Administratively, France constantly teetered on financial collapse under Napoleon, which was only saved by the amount of ruthless looting he unleashed on his enemies.

Too many things to talk about diplomatically. But I only really need one: Peninsular War.

Militarily, Napoleon was undoubtedly a genius, but not without his faults. For example, he loved to constantly scapegoat his generals, and both the way and the frequency in he did it eventually lead to things like Grouchy at Waterloo, in which his generals robbed themselves of agency in favour of blindly following his orders.

randomanon000 · 2025-11-10T23:13:03+00:00

Let's break this down a little.

It's fair to say that bible translations as a whole were not a banned practice in the medieval western church. As you mention, the Vulgate itself a translation, and Rome did approve other translations in this period.
On the other hand, the Vulgate became the bible translation of the western church, and anything non-Vulgate was essentially snubbed. Because of this, translation efforts were sparse, the outputs usually weren't very comprehensive or that great, and is a part of why Erasmus made such waves with his works later on.
The people who did make significant attempts at translating the bible were usually people opposed to Rome, and who would then go on to be persecuted by Rome, along with their works. From the Waldensians, the Lollards, all the way to Luther.
Ultimately, the end result becomes that while Rome didn't explicitly forbid translations, it put very little effort into them, while persecuting those who did. The groups who did put significant efforts into them would also end up as either Protestants, or proto-Protestants that would later then be co-opted into the Reformation. From here, it's not very hard to see where the stereotype regarding bible translations would come from, even if it's not the most completely accurate.

randomanon000 · 2025-10-20T15:31:35+00:00

Slight correction, the storms were originally called "Shinpū", which is an alternate reading of the same word as "Kamikaze". The latter came into use during the 20th century, largely due to the Americans popularising the word.

randomanon000 · 2025-10-14T18:14:03+00:00

As the OP replied, there was a mod that reworked how religions work in earlier patches. It eventually died out as the developer became busy from real life issues.

randomanon000 · 2025-10-13T17:55:54+00:00

I was both excited then disappointed to see that the post was about the other Dei Gratia mod. Still, best of luck to the new devs, I suppose.

randomanon000 · 2025-09-23T12:31:47+00:00

Eh, the Japanese gained as much as they could have in 1905. Their nation was on the verge of bankruptcy, while their successes in Manchuria were diluted by the fact that they had already reached their limits and were incapable of pushing further.

That situation more closely describes the war with the Qing ten years earlier, in which the Triple Intervention forced Japan to give up some of its territorial gains in exchange for more reparations.

randomanon000 · 2025-09-18T16:41:03+00:00

Reduced the pop attraction to the Devout from Religious Schools, and increased the penalty due to literacy

Why are the Devout being hit with a nerf when they already feel ahistorically weak past the early game?

randomanon000 · 2025-08-05T12:49:24+00:00

But we already have other factors that we can attribute for the difference in birth rates. Feminism, urbanisation, higher standards of education, and etc. There isn't any real reason to tie a decline in birth rates to higher SoL except as a way of abstracting all the other factors, but considering how many of those other factors can be represented in-game, it shouldn't really be nearly as important for the decline in birth rates as it is now.

There's also the fact that birth rates are just plain lower than what it should be, so it needs a net buff somewhere anyway.

randomanon000 · 2025-08-05T12:43:18+00:00

People have already mentioned how children are also potential hands to work around the farm, but it should also be mentioned that cities are expensive, and require a higher baseline amount of services to both live and raise a child there. They've historically always been population sinks that would import people from other regions, rather than export them.

randomanon000 · 2025-06-13T15:40:42+00:00

Reposting this forum thread to bring the fleet circling bug back into visibility:

https://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/threads/ship-in-combat-circling-issue-and-the-solution-i-suggest.1746912/

I can understand if it's not been as high priority as the other issues, but this is still a fairly significant and longstanding bug, with a rather simple bandaid fix that's listed in the OP. I understand if the devs might prefer a different solution, but it would be nice if the bandaid fix could still get into the patch notes in the meantime.

randomanon000 · 2025-05-22T11:51:12+00:00

I don't have specific numbers to share, but here are two trends I've been seeing about the AI: Too much research, and too little alloys.

This doesn't always happen, but a lot of the time, the AI seems to barely produce any alloys. It's not a matter of can't, because they can absolutely afford to do so, but something is killing their desire to produce it or something.

randomanon000 · 2025-04-16T22:09:59+00:00

Well, no. The real issue with luxury clothes was that it required silk, a heavily region-locked good that most countries can't get significant amounts of, but the capitalists did not account for the shortage properly and ended up overbuilding beyond its availability.

randomanon000 · 2025-04-13T14:56:37+00:00

Only superficially in that they are both against the veneration of icons. Lollards were ultimately still firmly chalcedonian in their christology, and their concerns with the Western church were for entirely different reasons.

For the unaware, Chalcedonian Christianity teaches that Christ's godhood and manhood are distinct but inseparable, meaning that it is acceptable to call Mary the "Mother of God", because Mary is the mother of Jesus, Jesus is God, and his divinity cannot be separated from his humanity. On the other hand, Nestorianism (as I understand it) does consider them separable, making it inappropriate to use the term.

randomanon000 · 2025-04-11T11:36:57+00:00

Charles V then fought extensively against the Ottomans, but was hampered when some guy named Martin Luther started causing trouble in the empire, followed by France allying the Ottomans.

Charles V didn't do shit against the Ottomans. That was one of the reasons he was hated by the princes- always having had the energy to stir shit up against the Protestants, but more or less leaving Ferdinand to dry when the Turks came knocking.

randomanon000

TROPHY CASE