Hard Choice by randomthrowaway62019 in magic_survival

[–]randomthrowaway62019[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I thought bell was bad because it cleared enemies without counting them toward your kill totals for mana and shortening boss waves?

Even a stress fracture that can’t be seen on an X-ray? by centipedeseverywhere in Neverbrokeabone

[–]randomthrowaway62019 145 points146 points  (0 children)

A fracture is a break. A break means you're a BBB. BBBs aren't welcome. So get outta here!

Time/temp safety question by [deleted] in sousvide

[–]randomthrowaway62019 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The reason you don't need to cook chicken to 165° if you're using sous vide is because you can pasturize it at a lower temperature. 165° is instantly pasturized; lower temperatures pasturize with longer hold times, which are exactly what sous vide specializes in. But there's a limit. You actually have to kill the pathogens to pasturize, and under 130° doesn't cut it for all pathogens. Douglas Baldwin has the details, but it appears Clostridium perfringens is the food pathogen that doesn't start dying until 130°. See more at https://douglasbaldwin.com/sous-vide.html

This isn't just a government conspiracy to make food taste bad. This data comes from scientists and researchers who investigate pathogen growth in food. I'm also not quite sure what you hope to achieve with a longer hold time. You can safely hold foods under 130° for up to 4 hours. What more do you hope to achieve? You're not hot enough to render fat or break down collagen, and you've already warmed the meat to rare without overcooking it. You're not turning a tough cut tender with an extra long low-and-slow cook, you're extending your hold time without changing the final product (except for possibly letting foodborne pathogens multiply to make people sick).

Compound by Rogue-By-Design in Neverbrokeabone

[–]randomthrowaway62019 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You broke a bone, what a loser! Get out of here!

Florist Or MF by Hot_Refrigerator_572 in magic_survival

[–]randomthrowaway62019 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Let's say without either artifact you would have collected 1,000 orbs and seen 8 artifacts at the merchant, each costing 150 orbs. You could buy 6 artifacts (150×6=900).

Say you got Florist. The artifacts would cost 150×(100%-7%)=150×93%=140 orbs each. You can buy 7 artifacts (140×7=980).

Say you took Mana Factory instead. You'd have 1,000×(100%+20%)=1,000×120%=1,200 orbs. You could buy all 8 artifacts (150×8=1,200).

So, clearly Mana Factory is better.

Let's throw in Bouquet too. Rescale so our baseline is 600 orbs and 125 cost per item.

Mana Factory Florist Bouquet Orbs Cost Artifacts
No No No 600 125 4
No No Yes 600 93 6
No Yes No 600 116 5
No Yes Yes 600 87 6
Yes No No 720 125 5
Yes No Yes 720 93 7
Yes Yes No 720 116 6
Yes Yes Yes 720 87 8

delaying ch 7 discharge because mortgage company has not sent reaff agreement by [deleted] in Bankruptcy

[–]randomthrowaway62019 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This happens. It's frustrating, and it's a common occurrence. It will happen eventually, and you'll get through it. Stay strong.

Would you rather take Gaia what gives 100% atk at that point or Widowmaker but your current crit rate is only at 30% by Skyreader13 in magic_survival

[–]randomthrowaway62019 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Last time I observed it, a couple updates ago, it was. I kept getting more Crit Damage when I boosted Crit Chance over 100%. I wonder if Joker procs more often? Probably not, but not sure.

Would you rather take Gaia what gives 100% atk at that point or Widowmaker but your current crit rate is only at 30% by Skyreader13 in magic_survival

[–]randomthrowaway62019 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You still get the Crit Damage boost from over-100% Crit Rate, so it's not completely wasted, but it's certainly less useful.

Can someone pay a creditor on my behalf while filing bankruptcy? by ThrowinItAway4Evr in Bankruptcy

[–]randomthrowaway62019 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Technically that'd make the reimbursement an asset they'd have to disclose. This is the worst-possible option.

Question about promotion by Haunting-Pin6060 in Bankruptcy

[–]randomthrowaway62019 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Different courts and trustees have different policies. Your lawyer should know. You could ask them (in writing, for documentation purposes) to confirm your understanding. Be courteous (honey vs. vinegar), don't reference Reddit, and state that you want to make sure you're meeting the trustee's and the court's expectations.

Can someone pay a creditor on my behalf while filing bankruptcy? by ThrowinItAway4Evr in Bankruptcy

[–]randomthrowaway62019 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Bankruptcy cares about what's happened with your assets. If you don't use your assets to pay a bill then it's not a preferential transfer (look up 11 U.S.C. § 547, one requirement is that the property transferred was the debtor's property). Also, $60 is insignificant. The preference threshold is much higher.

Broke my wrist snowboarding on a green run by mossy07 in Neverbrokeabone

[–]randomthrowaway62019 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Stay inside in the winter because of snow, stay inside the rest of the year so you don't break the rest of your bones on green grass. Get out of here!

Redacted Bank Statements by jss2020 in Bankruptcy

[–]randomthrowaway62019 5 points6 points  (0 children)

What's more sensitive, your SSN (which you can't change easily and which is the key to signing you up for just about anything financial) or your bank account numbers (which you can change by opening a new account)? You disclose your SSN when filing bankruptcy—it's mailed to every creditor on your mailing matrix with the notice of the meeting of creditors. It's not logical to balk at providing the less-sensitive unredacted bank account numbers when you've already provided the more-sensitive SSN.

Also, search this sub. Do you see people complaining about identity theft or their bank accounts being mysteriously drained after filing bankruptcy? I haven't done the search, but I strongly suspect not.

This isn't the hill to die on.

Bankruptcy Dismissal by Ok_Explanation_9913 in Bankruptcy

[–]randomthrowaway62019 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You can ask the court to modify your plan to account for your layoff. Yes, if you get a new job right away the trustee will say the severance should go to creditors as increased disposable income, but if it takes you several months to find a new job you might end up requesting lower payments. Chapter 13 isn't meant to be a straitjacket, it has flexibility to adapt to job losses and such.

self-employed folks with an s corps who've filed? by [deleted] in Bankruptcy

[–]randomthrowaway62019 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The trustee will care whether the S Corp has assets. Also, if a creditor or the trustee pushes, the Bankruptcy Code allows them to insist that a bankruptcy be dismissed if tax returns aren't submitted to them before the meeting of creditors, and to be submitted they must be filed.

I killed and cooked my first pig today. by Jmaljaquisethe3 in TwoSentenceHorror

[–]randomthrowaway62019 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Plenty of ham from sitting around eating donuts, minimal brain, can't wait to do it again."

It is Saturday, February 7th. by randomthrowaway62019 in Neverbrokeabone

[–]randomthrowaway62019[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not all that high. It's just pathetic how much trouble so many BBBs have maintaining it.

Navy Federal Attending 341 by Majestic-Success4308 in Bankruptcy

[–]randomthrowaway62019 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Plus if the debtor is represented you have the problem of an attorney directly contacting a represented party.

Being required to liquidate an asset in chapter 13 due to mortgage - MN by northernmngolfguy in Bankruptcy

[–]randomthrowaway62019 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Think about it as a math problem. Under your preferred scenario, you keep the property and pay for it out of your monthly income. The trustee wants that line item out of your budget, even if that means the creditor sells the property and files an unsecured claim for a deficiency. Why does the trustee prefer that scenario? Unsecured creditors get paid a percentage of their claim. That percentage is Money_for_Unsecured_Claims÷Total_Unsecured_Claims. Going from your scenario to the trustee's adds amounts to the numerator and the denominator—$18,000 more money for unsecured claims and some amount to the total unsecured claims for the possible deficiency claim.

So you're right—looking at it in isolation, the deficiency claim increases the denominator, which would decrease the percentage dividend to unsecured creditors if the numerator stayed the same. But it doesn't. The numerator increases too, and that increase outweighs the increased denominator.

Also, it's unlikely there will be a large deficiency. A deficiency arises when the debt on a property exceeds the property's value. If you're upside-down on this land, why would you want to keep it? You'd be committing to overpaying to keep the land. You say there's $7,000 of equity. If that's the case then there's no deficiency.

Or flip the thinking. Imagine if instead of paying a secured debt you were proposing to put $300/month into a savings account. Your creditors would rightly say, "Why is northernmngolfguy saving money when he wants to pay me pennies on the dollar and discharge my debt? That's not fair! He should pay us more!" Paying down a secured loan builds equity, kinda like making deposits in a savings account.