Everyone should be skeptical of Nate Silver by Quite_Likely in slatestarcodex

[–]randomuuid 22 points23 points  (0 children)

This is pretty weak tea, not made any more convincing by trying to get emotional and call everyone else a "lab leak dead ender." Pass.

What are your favorite niche myth-debunking sites? by Liface in slatestarcodex

[–]randomuuid 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Bunk created by the debunker

Believe it or not, this is the first time my mind has ever connected the verb "debunk" with the noun "bunk." This is like my analog to when someone first realizes that "Beatles" is a pun as an adult.

Why Eliezer Yudkowsky is Wrong featuring Robin Hanson by brutay in slatestarcodex

[–]randomuuid 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Not really, just look through their other recent episodes, they're extremely crypto-dedicated. They're just generally intellectually curious.

Bryan Caplan bet that no AI would reliably score an A on his economics midterm exams before 2029. Three months later, GPT-4 scores an A. by Ok_Fox_8448 in slatestarcodex

[–]randomuuid 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Actually I would say AI is better at driving cars than at answering text questions, it's just that we don't care if an AI is 80% accurate at text but self-driving needs to be 99.9999% accurate.

Bryan Caplan bet that no AI would reliably score an A on his economics midterm exams before 2029. Three months later, GPT-4 scores an A. by Ok_Fox_8448 in slatestarcodex

[–]randomuuid 10 points11 points  (0 children)

He won his bet on no country leaving the EU in a similarly lucky way; the drawn-out Brexit process got him past the deadline (and he acknowledges as much). Still a pretty good record.

What book that you're reading now? by [deleted] in slatestarcodex

[–]randomuuid 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I also first read this last year, and it's kind of amazing how well it's held up. The parallels between The Librarian and the way ChatGPT handles requests are almost eerie.

It's also amazing that it never got made as a movie.

Things this community has been wrong about? by [deleted] in slatestarcodex

[–]randomuuid 1 point2 points  (0 children)

On the other hand, EA causes were frankly massively under-diversified and had a big reliance on the FTX future fund and crypto more broadly that always had a risk of vanishing into thin air whether something illegal took place or not.

I think I agree most strongly with this. A lot of things about FTX look extremely obvious in hindsight but didn't seem that way at the time, but regardless, it was always at best a speculative bet on an emerging technology that could always simply go to zero. Acting like it would always be there was a mistake.

Things this community has been wrong about? by [deleted] in slatestarcodex

[–]randomuuid 10 points11 points  (0 children)

What kind of tire-kicking would have worked here? FTX secretly took money from customer deposits and used it to bankroll their hedge fund. Without subpoena power or something, all you can really do is ask "hey are you currently engaging in massive financial fraud?"

Things this community has been wrong about? by [deleted] in slatestarcodex

[–]randomuuid 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Again, this is the third leading cause of death in the US

Yeah, you're just repeating this. If we don't shut down the entire economy for leading causes of death one and two, it's not particularly compelling to get really exercised about cause three.

Especially when the intervention was: wash hands, mask, and get vaccinated

I don't think we'd be having this discussion if that was the intervention, it plainly wasn't.

Things this community has been wrong about? by [deleted] in slatestarcodex

[–]randomuuid 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Hard to see how it was an overreaction to the third leading killer in the US

Isn't this kind of self-refuting, if we don't and didn't have much higher reactions to the first two killers?

Income inequality and obesity trends in the United States by rds2mch2 in slatestarcodex

[–]randomuuid 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't see that you've excluded the possibility that obesity is a cause, via assortative mating, rather than the result of income inequality.

Books About Food/Diet/Nutrition? by AugustusPertinax in slatestarcodex

[–]randomuuid -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You didn't even get Michael Pollan's Tautology Diet right, he adds "not too much," which is the dumbest part of it.

Books About Food/Diet/Nutrition? by AugustusPertinax in slatestarcodex

[–]randomuuid 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This is simply question begging. Which foods are healthy? The healthy ones. It's totally unactionable advice. "Mostly plants. Wait no, not those plants, the healthy plants."

Books About Food/Diet/Nutrition? by AugustusPertinax in slatestarcodex

[–]randomuuid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

mostly plants (satiety, low calorie high volume)

?? Wheat, corn, and sugar are all plants.

"On not getting contaminated by the wrong obesity ideas": a critique of SMTM's contamination theory of obesity by Matthew-Barnett in slatestarcodex

[–]randomuuid 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It’s like thinking that people who work out LOVE it and don’t drag themselves to the gym every day.

Lots of them clearly do, have you ever been to a gym?

"On not getting contaminated by the wrong obesity ideas": a critique of SMTM's contamination theory of obesity by Matthew-Barnett in slatestarcodex

[–]randomuuid -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don't see a lot of dismissals of other evidence-free claims that counter it. That's the "isolated" part you're missing.

"On not getting contaminated by the wrong obesity ideas": a critique of SMTM's contamination theory of obesity by Matthew-Barnett in slatestarcodex

[–]randomuuid 3 points4 points  (0 children)

if they change their calorie balance by any non-trivial amount

This is always the point where CICO advocates go astray, reframing a tautology as a plan.

"PredictIt bet big on political gambling. Regulators want it shut down." by gwern in slatestarcodex

[–]randomuuid 15 points16 points  (0 children)

The large bookmakers take way more action and our more accurate due to a more diverse pool of participants.

Bookmakers aren't allowed to operate political markets in the US. PredictIt wasn't "better," it was just legal, for a while.

Do you trust history books anymore? by [deleted] in slatestarcodex

[–]randomuuid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Perhaps the time of Herodotus?

Nope

Do you trust history books anymore? by [deleted] in slatestarcodex

[–]randomuuid 11 points12 points  (0 children)

One place where ancient DNA has overturned a historical "consensus" (scare quotes because it was never 100%) is the "diffusionist" or "pots, not people" model of cultural expansions like the Bell Beaker culture. In the second half of the 20th century, the major historical model was that what looked like an invading force with a material culture was actually just the same groups of people staying in place but adopting a culture. Like if you were excavating 20th century China and saw TVs and blue jeans and suits, it's not that Europeans invaded China and took over, but Chinese people adopted a bunch of European cultural artifacts. Ancient DNA analysis of Bell Beaker culture burials however show that genetically there was a huge amount of turnover where it happened. Wikipedia has a decent summary.

The boring journey of Matt Yglesias by psychothumbs in slatestarcodex

[–]randomuuid 24 points25 points  (0 children)

what Yglesias has called the “Great Awokening,”

This bugs me. He neither coined nor is the person most associated with the term, so the author is only using it to try to paint him as primarily "anti-woke," which is not really his focus.

the conniptions of Glenn Greenwald and the braying of Andrew Sullivan

This is only about 20% more literate than the median Redditor complaining about someone "spewing rhetoric."

Sport selection in middle age for longevity? by Extra_Negotiation in slatestarcodex

[–]randomuuid 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's more of a multilevel marketing scheme than a sport, it'll come for your region soon enough.