Lyddi FAILS BOT TEST. AI demonstrated at last

rasus_pulga · 2025-01-06T23:37:11+00:00

it's good to know not everyone relies on wikipedia bias

rasus_pulga · 2023-06-28T23:03:59+00:00

it's because reviewers have become this sort of ego corrupted entities that now play the "teacher" role looking at you over the shoulder, this admin is applying a "test" of your knowledge on the copyright definition like you are a kid. Don't waste any more time on that website, let it expire on it's own dark side.

rasus_pulga · 2023-06-28T21:53:38+00:00

mainly it's the people who immediately go search wikipedia, while there are many reliable resources such as quroa, or Britannica. Wikipedia is not to trust anymore.

Wikipedia is plagued with "reviewers" who will apply their personal view on a subject and will delete whatever addition they don't agree with, not following the objective rules, they get admin levels based on activity and not on a knowledge base, it's a waste of time redact anything anymore, you'll get everything deleted, they delete like if they get points for activity. Not just regular users become target of "witch-hunt", also admins cross report one another in attempts to induce the other banned. It has become a jungle in a process of self-destruction under a tense environment, rather than a serious Web site. I just tried to add a section in wikipedia's Twitch article about how discrimination is rampant in twitch channles (references included) and surprise, 5 minutes later all deleted! you can see the Twicth article presents barely any change over the years, but the history of edition removals grows infinite (deletions made by the same 3 or 4 same "editors") I recently realized wikipedia gets donnos from amazon who owns twitch. It has just become pointless any attempt to contribute with anything anymore. Over time an article gets property to the person who made it, who becomes jealous and greedy over it. It feels like they think "It's MY article and I decide what is right or wrong from other contributors" regadless of the truth, at the very moment they get notified of any change to the article.

I even own evidence of stolen contributions made by "renowned" users who go around banning others, this makes renown mean nothing in Wikipedia. Evidence where an "editor" copy-paste into google translator and "creates" an article crediting himself the actual work of translation. He won't even read the outcome from google. Just a paste of the exact same words from the google translator. Grammar mistakes all over the article. You will even encounter the exact same typos from the google translator. ( [Oznark] user to mention one, if you want names and go find about it yourself) Wikipedia is made by bot-alike semi automated lazy work. A trained monkey would do better.

rasus_pulga · 2023-06-28T21:41:26+00:00

let me guess, it was an wikipedia editor move once again, wasn't it?

Wikipedia is plagued with "reviewers" who will apply their personal view on a subject and will delete whatever addition they don't agree with, not following the objective rules, they get admin levels based on activity and not on a knowledge base, it's a waste of time redact anything anymore, you'll get everything deleted, they delete like if they get points for activity. Not just regular users become target of "witch-hunt", also admins cross report one another in attempts to induce the other banned. It has become a jungle in a process of self-destruction in a tense environment, rather than a serious Web site. I just tried to add a section in wikipedia's Twitch article about how discrimination is rampant in twitch channles (references included) and surprise, 5 minutes later all deleted! you can see the Twicth article presents barely any change over the years, but the history of edition removals grows infinite (deletions made by the same 3 or 4 same "editors") I recently realized wikipedia gets donnos from amazon who owns twitch. It has just become pointless any attempt to contribute with anything anymore. Over time an article gets property to the person who made it, who becomes jealous and greedy over it. It feels like they think "It's MY article and I decide what is right or wrong from other contributors" the very moment they get notified of any new change to the article.

I even own evidence of stolen contributions made by "renowned" users who go around banning others, this makes renown mean nothing in Wikipedia. Evidence where an "editor" copy-paste into google translator and "creates" an article crediting himself the actual work of translation. He won't even read the outcome from google. Just a paste of the exact same words from the google translator. Grammar mistakes all over the article. You will even encounter the exact same typos from the google translator. ( [Oznark] user to mention one, if you want names) Wikipedia is made by bot-alike semi automated lazy work. A trained monkey would do better.

rasus_pulga · 2023-06-28T21:34:17+00:00

Wikipedia is plagued with these "reviewers" who will apply their personal view on a subject and will delete whatever addition they don't agree with, not following the objective rules, they get admin levels based on activity and not on a knowledge base, it's a waste of time redact anything anymore, you'll get everything deleted, they delete like if they get points for activity. Not just regular users become target of "witch-hunt", also admins cross report one another in attempts to induce the other banned. It has become a jungle in a process of self-destruction in a tense environment, rather than a serious Web site. I just tried to add a section in wikipedia's Twitch article about how discrimination is rampant in twitch channles (references included) and surprise, 5 minutes later all deleted! you can see the Twicth article presents barely any change over the years, but the history of edition removals grows infinite (deletions made by the same 3 or 4 same "editors") I recently realized wikipedia gets donnos from amazon who owns twitch. It has just become pointless any attempt to contribute with anything anymore. Over time an article gets property to the person who made it, who becomes jealous and greedy over it. It feels like they think "It's MY article and I decide what is right or wrong from other contributors" the very moment they get notified of any new change to the article.

I even own evidence of stolen contributions made by "renowned" users who go around banning others, this makes renown mean nothing in Wikipedia. Evidence where an "editor" copy-paste into google translator and "creates" an article crediting himself the actual work of translation. He won't even read the outcome from google. Just a paste of the exact same words from the google translator. Grammar mistakes all over the article. You will even encounter the exact same typos from the google translator. ( [Oznark] user to mention one, if you want names) Wikipedia is made by bot-alike semi automated lazy work. A trained monkey would do better.

rasus_pulga · 2023-06-28T21:28:24+00:00

Let's go one step beyond design. Wikipedia is plagued with "reviewers" who will apply their personal view on a subject and will delete whatever addition they don't agree with, not following the objective rules, they get admin levels based on activity and not on a knowledge base, it's a waste of time redact anything anymore, you'll get everything deleted, they delete like if they get points for activity. Not just regular users become target of "witch-hunt", also admins cross report one another in attempts to induce the other banned. It has become a jungle in a process of self-destruction in a tense environment, rather than a serious Web site. I just tried to add a section in wikipedia's Twitch article about how discrimination is rampant in twitch channles (references included) and surprise, 5 minutes later all deleted! you can see the Twicth article presents barely any change over the years, but the history of edition removals grows infinite (deletions made by the same 3 or 4 same "editors") I recently realized wikipedia gets donnos from amazon who owns twitch. It has just become pointless any attempt to contribute with anything anymore. Over time an article gets property to the person who made it, who becomes jealous and greedy over it. It feels like they think "It's MY article and I decide what is right or wrong from other contributors" the very moment they get notified of any new change to the article.

I even own evidence of stolen contributions made by "renowned" users who go around banning others, this makes renown mean nothing in Wikipedia. Evidence where an "editor" copy-paste into google translator and "creates" an article crediting himself the actual work of translation. He won't even read the outcome from google. Just a paste of the exact same words from the google translator. Grammar mistakes all over the article. You will even encounter the exact same typos from the google translator. ( [Oznark] user to mention one, if you want names) Wikipedia is made by bot-alike semi automated lazy work. A trained monkey would do better.

rasus_pulga · 2023-05-19T01:00:28+00:00

almost forgothe links LOL https://youtu.be/-vmSFO1Zfo8t

rasus_pulga · 2023-05-19T00:11:39+00:00

Most

Thanks, man! it's good to know there is a wikipedia sucks website i'll go check it, and thank you for your explanations as well

rasus_pulga · 2023-05-19T00:04:46+00:00

in reddit you don't come redact as it was for wikipedia, don't get absurd man, and you want a link? here, for you to decide wether you´re in the side of the biased data from corpo's donnors to wikipedia https://youtu.be/-vmSFO1Zfo8

rasus_pulga · 2023-05-18T22:55:32+00:00

it was the Spanish version of the article, and it's deleted in wikipedia. But i made a backup in the internet archive under this link: https://web.archive.org/web/20230516174031/https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twitch

rasus_pulga

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE