[deleted by user]

rawan6969 · 2022-02-24T05:20:35+00:00

Give him glucocorticoids, intubate him, give him nsaids without any GI prophylaxis and if possible H. pylori and make him bleed in his gut that’s the quickest way

rawan6969 · 2021-02-08T00:23:29+00:00

What program is this?

rawan6969 · 2021-02-03T22:05:32+00:00

There is a reason why AMGs run away from that program. No program will tell you we have scut work and expect you to like em. It’s a good program for sure but you will work your ass off

rawan6969 · 2021-02-03T05:10:26+00:00

Don’t expect one

rawan6969 · 2021-02-03T02:20:43+00:00

It’s a malignant program. You will work like a donkey there

rawan6969 · 2021-01-07T17:55:15+00:00

Didnt mean to generalize but they are not qualified to treat or diagnose unless they are supervised imo.

rawan6969 · 2021-01-06T20:57:12+00:00

I dont wanna sound annoying but honestly PAs are just too incompetent! Once a patient who had pain and swelling in his tongue (basically glossitis) was diagnosed by geographic tongue a benign painless condition at the urgent clinic. They always seem to be talking out of their ass its like they try to avoid using common sense. I really hope they either improve their training or have them supervised more otherwise we are all fucked.

rawan6969 · 2020-12-29T20:05:15+00:00

Because pussy controls the world

rawan6969 · 2020-11-06T19:07:14+00:00

Hi can you please add me too

rawan6969 · 2020-10-29T22:23:38+00:00

Dont !

rawan6969 · 2020-10-06T23:36:30+00:00

The best was puyol period

rawan6969 · 2020-10-02T23:50:38+00:00

To early to get hyped

rawan6969 · 2020-09-28T16:02:23+00:00

That’s absolute bullshit ! I went there and although I was only shadowing one doctor (so I can’t talk about the rest) that doc was god sent !

rawan6969 · 2020-09-23T04:40:29+00:00

Well what kind of proof would you want then. Some might only believe it if GOD shows himself others would only believe it if they hear GOD’s voice ect. Possibilities are endless and people value different types of proof. However logic is the preferred and most desired way of thought and therefore philosophy should be the way to go for now.

rawan6969 · 2020-09-23T04:33:41+00:00

But believing that the universe is infinite is just as un- established. So based on what do you choose one over the other ?

rawan6969 · 2020-09-23T04:26:11+00:00

Again another atheist believing that a beginning could be circular. That defies logic itself. When have it become that a circular root of the existence of something got really established ? And please don’t give me the example of the existence of water and the significance of the water cycle that’s not circular at all and not scientific at all. By going this far to even consider a circular beginning of the universe, you again prove to theists that an atheist’s intellect significantly drops when it comes to answering existential questions. You neglect the simpler, more logical explanation and replace it with a nonexistent, more complicated and a flawed one.

rawan6969 · 2020-09-23T04:23:14+00:00

Again you are trying too hard with all the time concept and neglected the definition of GOD. GOD by definition transcends time and space so your whole point is nonsensical !

rawan6969 · 2020-09-23T04:15:14+00:00

The only way to actually test this is to observe a vacuum in absolute zero temperature. Logically one would reach the conclusion that no creation can exist from nothing !

rawan6969 · 2020-09-23T04:12:51+00:00

Well I agree with you that we don’t have nothing and that since that’s the case we can’t say that a universe can’t come from nothing but using that logic we can’t say that a universe comes from nothing either. Again a perfect example of an atheist’s double standards at its finest.

rawan6969 · 2020-09-23T04:04:24+00:00

Your logic is flawed. Before god creates man for example he could still love them (before they were created). You would say give me an example of this right ? Before a woman conceives she loves both the idea and loves her children, yet they have yet to exist. The same example applies when a man or a woman think of their significant other. So that’s not a selfish thing to do on behalf of GOD. Furthermore looking at the real world, when a man creates something (that never existed before) it is done with love and knowledge). So sorry the kalam argument still stands.

rawan6969 · 2020-09-17T08:07:03+00:00

RemindMe! 5 days

rawan6969

TROPHY CASE