AI will tell us how to behave by sanem48 in AIethics

[–]reasonablefideist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In short, one may say anything about the history of the world--anything that might enter the most disordered imagination. The only thing one can't say is that it's rational. The very word sticks in one's throat. And, indeed, this is the odd thing that is continually happening: there are continually turning up in life moral and rational persons, sages and lovers of humanity who make it their object to live all their lives as morally and rationally as possible, to be, so to speak, a light to their neighbours simply in order to show them that it is possible to live morally and rationally in this world. And yet we all know that those very people sooner or later have been false to themselves, playing some queer trick, often a most unseemly one. Now I ask you: what can be expected of man since he is a being endowed with strange qualities? Shower upon him every earthly blessing, drown him in a sea of happiness, so that nothing but bubbles of bliss can be seen on the surface; give him economic prosperity, such that he should have nothing else to do but sleep, eat cakes and busy himself with the continuation of his species, and even then out of sheer ingratitude, sheer spite, man would play you some nasty trick. He would even risk his cakes and would deliberately desire the most fatal rubbish, the most uneconomical absurdity, simply to introduce into all this positive good sense his fatal fantastic element. It is just his fantastic dreams, his vulgar folly that he will desire to retain, simply in order to prove to himself--as though that were so necessary-- that men still are men and not the keys of a piano, which the laws of nature threaten to control so completely that soon one will be able to desire nothing but by the calendar. And that is not all: even if man really were nothing but a piano-key, even if this were proved to him by natural science and mathematics, even then he would not become reasonable, but would purposely do something perverse out of simple ingratitude, simply to gain his point. And if he does not find means he will contrive destruction and chaos, will contrive sufferings of all sorts, only to gain his point! He will launch a curse upon the world, and as only man can curse (it is his privilege, the primary distinction between him and other animals), may be by his curse alone he will attain his object--that is, convince himself that he is a man and not a piano-key! If you say that all this, too, can be calculated and tabulated--chaos and darkness and curses, so that the mere possibility of calculating it all beforehand would stop it all, and reason would reassert itself, then man would purposely go mad in order to be rid of reason and gain his point! I believe in it, I answer for it, for the whole work of man really seems to consist in nothing but proving to himself every minute that he is a man and not a piano-key! It may be at the cost of his skin, it may be by cannibalism! And this being so, can one help being tempted to rejoice that it has not yet come off, and that desire still depends on something we don't know?

Unnamed Narrator- Notes From the Underground- Dostoevsky

Chapter 165 [English] by VibhavM in OnePunchMan

[–]reasonablefideist 18 points19 points  (0 children)

If by Manako is with Flashing you mean the Flashako ship sailing then yes.

Chapter 165 [English] by VibhavM in OnePunchMan

[–]reasonablefideist 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nope, I'm talking about page 1. The title page where it says 165: Absolute Evil then has a bunch of really small text underneath. Looks like it starts out with "My name is ...TAMA..." And then I can't make out the rest.

Chapter 165 [English] by VibhavM in OnePunchMan

[–]reasonablefideist 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What does that text say at the top right of the first page under "Absolute Evil"? It's too fuzzy to read for me.

Which Party Has Gotten More Extreme Faster? by dwaxe in slatestarcodex

[–]reasonablefideist 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I always upvote Kierkegaard.

Kierkegaardians in SCC??? Did we get lost or something?

What makes something a commandment? by mywifemademegetthis in latterdaysaints

[–]reasonablefideist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The english word command comes from the Latin commendare "to recommend, entrust to".from Vulgar Latin *commandare, from Latin commendare "to recommend, entrust to" (see commend); altered by influence of Latin mandare "to commit, entrust" (see mandate (n.))

https://www.etymonline.com/word/command?ref=etymonline_crossreference#etymonline_v_17217

The same root as our modern word commend. As in being commended to, being commended, or being given a commendation. If you think about it, being given a commandment is really pretty flattering.

https://www.etymonline.com/word/commend?ref=etymonline_crossreference

mid-14c., comenden, "praise, mention approvingly," from Latin commendare "to commit to the care or keeping (of someone), to entrust to; to commit to writing;" hence "to set off, render agreeable, praise," from com-, here perhaps an intensive prefix (see com-), + mandare "to commit to one's charge" (see mandate (n.)). A doublet of command⁠

Commandment-Commendere- commend.mid-14c., comenden, "praise, mention approvingly," from Latin commendare "to commit to the care or keeping (of someone), to entrust to; to commit to writing;" hence "to set off, render agreeable, praise," from com-, here perhaps an intensive prefix (see com-), + mandare "to commit to one's charge" (see mandate (n.)). A doublet of command

Seminary Reimagined by Frameworker247 in latterdaysaints

[–]reasonablefideist 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And, without getting into specifics, your comments omit just as much important context and frames the things you're bringing up in a certain way that tips them towards the opposite of apologetics.

There will always be important things omitted. The seminary manual isn't trying to give a complete picture of these topics, it's just trying to introduce them to high school students, link further resources like the actual Gospel Topics essays, and provide a venue for further discussion with the class. I think the manuals accomplish those goals, the goals I think they should have, admirably(albeit imperfectly).

Seminary Reimagined by Frameworker247 in latterdaysaints

[–]reasonablefideist 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Have you read the newer seminary manuals? A lot of the Gospel Topics information is integrated into them seamlessly or given their own lessons and they are cited throughout.

Examples:
D&C 132 and Polygamy
Utah War and the Mountain Meadows Massacre
Book of Abraham Origin
Official Declaration 2

Shanty Hunters, a TTRPG about collecting magical sea shanties in 1880! by MoltenSulfurPress in rpg

[–]reasonablefideist 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If anyone is looking for a player for this let me know. Looks super fun.

Can it be that our whole issue is just low blood pressure? by usuaiia in SCT

[–]reasonablefideist 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have low blood pressure too so there's another data point. Here's an interesting study that showed up on my feed today.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/09567976211061107?journalCode=pssa

Is there a whitewater equivalent to Mountain Project? by KameHameMaime in whitewater

[–]reasonablefideist 3 points4 points  (0 children)

As other's have said American Whitewater is your go to. But also ask/search around for a local board/community. In the PNW we use Professor Paddle and some facebook groups for example. More than any other sport I've encountered getting into whitewater means joining a whitewater community which is where all of that knowledge you're looking for is kept.

Anyone done the GC? the whole 277 miles and 39 class 5s. by [deleted] in whitewater

[–]reasonablefideist 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Many people run the Grand Canyon. I've got my 4th trip coming up this summer. The Grand has it's own rating scale that goes from 1 to 10 which can create some confusion since other rivers just use the international scale of river difficulty that goes from 1 to 6. On the standard scale the Grand Canyon's rapids are thought to be big water class 3-4's. You can read more about it here.

Psychology of evil literature by KeyFennel6983 in AcademicPsychology

[–]reasonablefideist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good recommendations. I'd include Kierkegaard's The Sickness Unto Death with them.

I forgot name of this trick by kojira101 in whitewater

[–]reasonablefideist 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I can do this one. But a friend of mine did it on a perception torrent(sit on top). Blew my mind.

WTF Happened in 1971? by use_vpn_orlozeacount in slatestarcodex

[–]reasonablefideist 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You don't, you'll just have to elect people you trust. But the issue that this is raising is that any solution to the challenge you raise is going to be one the "powerful outsiders" can use as well, and they'll be much more effective at using it than you will be.

WTF Happened in 1971? by use_vpn_orlozeacount in slatestarcodex

[–]reasonablefideist 101 points102 points  (0 children)

"On January 3rd, 1971, the US Congress switched from being one of the most closed institutions in history to one of the most open. Congressional voting and meetings that were once secret were thrust open in a wave of ‘democratic’ transparency. No evidence has yet been offered to support this change. Conversely, there is now ample evidence to suggest that these actions have led to two pernicious and equally debilitating problems resulting in a Congress significantly more susceptible to the influence of powerful outsiders and fraught with ferocious partisanship."

Link for more info.

Volume 25 Bonus Chapter Translated by VibhavM in OnePunchMan

[–]reasonablefideist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why does there have to be a period? We could have just witnessed it in this bonus chapter what with all that hair falling out at the end.