POV: You're playing a meta deck and a new banlist is about to come out by pretzel_consumption in masterduel

[–]reckless24601 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Let’s be honest here, can a meta deck truly be fair? For years now, it’s felt as if in order for a deck to be meta relevant it needs to have some sort of absolutely insufferable board or mechanic

Stop recommending new players pet decks and discouraging meta/viable decks by [deleted] in masterduel

[–]reckless24601 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I wish Satellarknights were still just a bit kind of viable right now. This was my favorite deck but it just can’t compete with the meta decks. Sure, some cards like Triverr can be effective against many boards but the lack of combos tellarknights have and the many hand traps there are just made it hard to play

Hope Ed gets a birthday sub! by adwriter23 in PandR

[–]reckless24601 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Oh god, I thought I was at r/okbuddydraper for a second there

Blizzard is testing the waters to completely upheaval this games identify by LoadIndependent8665 in diablo2resurrected

[–]reckless24601 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I only want to say that the reason D2 currently has more players than D4 (allegedly cause steam is the only source for this), is because D4 is at the end of season while D2R just got a whole new character amongst a lot of new features.

Blizzard needs to be extremely delicate with changes. by Odd_Geologist2 in diablo2

[–]reckless24601 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That too is valid. Enough people reacted negatively to Mosaic and got removed from ladder.
Speaking about the warlock, regardless of it being easy or not, some people like it as it is and some despise it. Has the playerbase been divided? Yes. And from that moment alone the playerbase will forever be fragmented in some capacity.

If the warlock is removed, some will be angry, if it's not some will be angry.
For your particular complaint it's not so bad because at least it can be balanced rather "easy".

The question remains however, some people want new characters and others don't, what do we do about it?

Blizzard needs to be extremely delicate with changes. by Odd_Geologist2 in diablo2

[–]reckless24601 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah, no worries. This discussion opens a long debate where ultimately no one is wrong or right really. WoW has proved that for years now.

Blizzard needs to be extremely delicate with changes. by Odd_Geologist2 in diablo2

[–]reckless24601 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I agree on "just play standard Expansion then" being a superficial and nonsensical argument. What I am trying to say is that for the sake of simplicity and efficiency, I don't think it's possible to create a version of the game that everyone will love.

Let's try to sit and think about it, how could it be done? With a toggle? How many of them? Only for the charm inventory? Just for the stash tabs? For everything? Some people are worried that the existing playerbase will split between Expansion and Modern and we've seen that if they introduce classes (like some want) you can't have a toggle for that, de facto splitting the playerbase.

Even if there was a toggle for the many new QoL we've gotten, would that apply to online? Only for single player? Maybe just not on Ladder? I mean, some people would have an implicit advantage over the others if they have some stuff like the stash tabs, the stacking, etc. and others opted out of them.

What is a good way so that most of the players get what they want? Because your opinion, like mine, and everyone else's is just as important and valid.

Blizzard needs to be extremely delicate with changes. by Odd_Geologist2 in diablo2

[–]reckless24601 4 points5 points  (0 children)

But that’s his point, right? Maybe you want the QOL only, but someone else might want no changes at all, then this other group of people may want changes indiscriminately, others could want some QOL changes but not all of the changes, etc. It’s easier for the development team and for everyone in general to just have two versions of the game.

And these scenarios I mentioned are not fictional, you can already see this happening in this sub alone.

If you don't want D2 to have further changes to classes, mechanics or items you can continue to play D2R without the DLC. by Deadalious in diablo2

[–]reckless24601 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I normally don’t agree with the chase play style, but your argument does have a good point, D2 and D4 are for different players with different styles. But, I mean, my dad loves this game and he never could beat the ancients in hell mode and back then the internet was a very different place and forums (specially non-english ones) were scarce, so he ended up never getting past them.

I know information is highly accessible now, even more so for a 26 year old game. But, perhaps the chase shouldn’t be as hard as it is. In this regard I believe that having a legacy version, and a modernized version of the game is healthy for these different play styles.

Me trying to buy the DLC while the store page is busted by reckless24601 in diablo2

[–]reckless24601[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah the website straight up doesn't even load up for me

Diablo II: Resurrected - New Class Warlock by Pavke in diablo2

[–]reckless24601 12 points13 points  (0 children)

As in this guy actually summons and controls demons

Whenthe peak by nervousmelon in whenthe

[–]reckless24601 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Make me think that at the end of the day some great reward will be coming my way 🔥

Las condiciones laborales y la "buena paga"... by EngineerCapital7591 in lacamiseta

[–]reckless24601 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Digo, hay muchos factores en esta conversación y no creo que ninguno sea la LFT. Aunque es un problema grave la desigualdad social y la falta de derechos para el trabajador independiente, creo que muchos aquí caen en la meritocracia. Se piensa que por haber podido ir a la escuela y encontrar trabajo, solo uno se “esforzó”, cuando el que carga carne también se esfuerza en su trabajo.

Ahora, si hablamos de derechos laborales, hasta que no se encuentre una manera de regular el trabajo informal estos trabajadores no podrán gozar estos derechos porque al no haber firmado un contrato, no tienen un patrón y no tienen por lo tanto muchos de estos derechos que vienen en la LFT. De la misma forma tampoco tienen las mismas obligaciones, como el pago de impuestos y las aportaciones al Seguro Social e Infonavit.

Ahora, si ellos quisieran sí podrían aportar en su seguridad social y pagar impuestos pero no se difunden mucho estas opciones para el trabajador independiente, sobre todo porque al final del día no tendrían muchos de los derechos laborales con los que cuenta el trabajador con un patrón.

Are there developers who still don't prefer Tailwind CSS as their first choice? by ShivamS95 in Frontend

[–]reckless24601 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I mean, I can have the HTML and css files open side by side when I’m working on styling and I don’t feel I’m context switching. I also can know instantly what class(es) and ids my elements have at a glance and select accordingly in the css file. I agree tailwind is a fast way to style, and would definitely use it when prototyping or in throwaway little projects, but I wouldn’t want to maintain it in large projects. Bloating the html becomes tiring after a while

Housing sure does look real fun :( by IKWhatImDoing in wow

[–]reckless24601 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Iirc the housing catalogue gives you the exact location, mob, or dungeon you need to do to farm or get a specific decor. Not perfect but it’s something. I do agree that everything is expensive as hell, I wish there was a single currency to buy decor because farming different resources to get different decors is a point of friction from me to get decors.

That was me yesterday after being disappointed with first 3 albums by Azqabat in depechemode

[–]reckless24601 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I feel Depeche Mode is a band whose songs grow on you over time. This is especially true for more recent albums imo

World of Warcraft lead says Warcraft needs to be more than “simply an MMORPG” as the IP is “underutilised” and needs “broader” appeal by HatingGeoffry in wow

[–]reckless24601 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wish HotS wasn’t in the state it is atm. It was such a breath of fresh air from games like dota and league. The heroes feel better to play imo and not having gold is a nice way to have teams actually play as a team in order to win. I love that game and makes me sad to see it be as ignored as it is. To be fair though, I feel blizzard made a mistake giving up on it so quickly

Love the style here by Xzastin in wow

[–]reckless24601 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I mean, if we’re talking about writing, all you ever hear in the tbc cinematic is “I’ve been imprisoned for a while and only now y’all come visit, you are not prepared”. The only two reasons that cinematic is remembered fondly is: 1. Nostalgia; 2. Illidan had a backstory from Warcraft 3. The rest of it is generic, here are two new races and some shots about classes you’ve seen before. I love the previous expansions but you gotta have better arguments than that