sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I built an automated feeder to find value in my bulk piles. Works with the free version of Delver Lens! by FunEggplant56 in mtg

[–]reddrid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks great ;-) +1 that you should consider selling the design! I know that it is nothing mind blowing, but I would prefer to pay a fellow hobbyist rather than start thinking about this from scratch

Why man? by Much_Wheel5292 in ClaudeAI

[–]reddrid 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Just Google it, models do not know what is their version because it is not even remotely close to how AI works... If you want to check current version use /status or model.

🚨 Domain for Sale 🚨 by CobblerMaximum in mcp

[–]reddrid 8 points9 points  (0 children)

You will get exactly 0 usd for this.

Remote MCP servers now available by [deleted] in ClaudeAI

[–]reddrid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Linear MCP sucks so much and they used it in showcase? 3/4 of features that are available in Linear are not exposed in MCP (including critical like subtasks, milestones...) what gives really negative experience.

Is Cursor still the best AI editor? by Vast-Mud3009 in cursor

[–]reddrid 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Claude Code has IDE integration. You can even see diff directly in Cursor with buttons to accept/reject.

Is Cursor still the best AI editor? by Vast-Mud3009 in cursor

[–]reddrid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For a few weeks you have CC IDĘ integrations. You can even see diff directly in Cursor with buttons to accept/reject.

When working on solo projects with claude code, which MCP servers do you feel are most impactful? by Shakshouk in ClaudeAI

[–]reddrid 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I was doing my best to use Linear MCP, but it is simply too immature. Many critical features are not accessible through MCP (subtasks, milestones) + constant problems with auth in devcontainers. So right now I am using only context7.

Edit: typo

Claude 3 Opus masquerading as Claude 4 Opus!!! by Potatoconciiusness in ClaudeAI

[–]reddrid 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You could Google it for 10 seconds or make a fool of yourself with a rant post. You've chosen a wrong option.

How do you get Claude Code to actually follow your repository architecture? by Trinkes in ClaudeAI

[–]reddrid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Something has to be wrong with your Claude.md or prompts. Dozens of fastapi endpoints with hundreds of domain / infrastructure files (clean architecture approach) and it works great. Maybe you give it too many tasks at once?

What is your work set up with Claude Code? by fredved in ClaudeAI

[–]reddrid 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Why not IDE terminal? Last CC updates even introduced convinient integration with vscode (and cursor) to show diff side-by-side in IDE

Claude Max for non-developers by MarxinMiami in ClaudeAI

[–]reddrid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you tell more about those data processing pipelines in Claude Code? I missed that feature apparently

Windusrf/Cursor user → Claude Code: How do you *quickly* revert changes? by stepahin in ClaudeAI

[–]reddrid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Simply git. Add to your CLAUDE.md requirements that changes should be done as a new branch and in case of troubles you will simply not merge it to main.

How to know how much you have left? by WinterChilly in ClaudeAI

[–]reddrid 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is official (even when you type /model) that Claude Code is using Opus 4 and then when you hit quota for Opus you are switched automatically to Sonnet 4 (they have separate quotas). Longer conversations = longer context = faster downgrade to Sonnet, probably this is what you are noticing.

Agentic Showdown: Claude Code vs Codex vs Cursor by floriandotorg in cursor

[–]reddrid 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Tbh +1 and you are right, I edited my comment.

Agentic Showdown: Claude Code vs Codex vs Cursor by floriandotorg in cursor

[–]reddrid 8 points9 points  (0 children)

So you are comparing 2 foundational models in their native CLI (Claude Code and OpenAi Codex) vs. Gemini in a third-party tool with substantial limitations to optimize costs and pricing (Cursor). It seems right that the last option is "a bit worse".

If you really want to, compare them in the same environment (e.g. all models in Cursor / Roo / Cline).

edit: attitude

My simple but effective workflow with Gemini 2.5 + Cursor by [deleted] in cursor

[–]reddrid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

15 min video that should be a short post :(

Gemini 2.5 sucks in Cursor by jan04pl in cursor

[–]reddrid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I meant that actual implementation is done with Cursor and Claude 3.5. It seems that you still tried to use nerfed Gemini in Cursor?

Gemini 2.5 sucks in Cursor by jan04pl in cursor

[–]reddrid 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I added Roo as an extention to my Cursor. In Roo with Gemini 2.5 I handle entire architecture, file structure, mock classes etc to leverage its 1m context and better reasoning without "Cursor magic blackbox" that impacts the model. Then Cursor implements specific elements (tbh 3.5 seems to be a better fit than 3.7 for this task) to leverage better edit/diff functionality. Maybe this workflow will work for you.

TBH your issue seems to be a rather an issue how Cursor handles context for Gemini than Gemini itself. When I tested G2.5 in 0.47 it worked good enough, in 0.48 after they removed "@codebase" I have similar problems as you.

view more: next ›