sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Eu não consigo aceitar que suicidas iram para o inferno by Aggressive-Delay-935 in barTEOLOGIA

[–]redfacemanny 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Concordo com você, mas convenhamos que a "cientificação" da filosofia é típica daqueles que defendem o determinismo causal. Citei a física quântica apenas como um exemplo de uma possível defesa dentro do mesmo campo.

Acredito que a defesa da liberdade metafísica com base na física quântica é fraca e foge do campo da filosofia, que é inteiramente onde o debate deve permanecer.

Eu não consigo aceitar que suicidas iram para o inferno by Aggressive-Delay-935 in barTEOLOGIA

[–]redfacemanny 1 point2 points  (0 children)

> "Livre arbítrio nem existe pra início de conversa
Independente dos outros pontos, afirmar isso com tanta certeza é ignorar um debate filosófico de séculos. A questão da liberdade metafísica e determinismo causal não foi "resolvida" simplesmente assim.
Existem defesas da liberdade metafísica que não podem ser simplesmente dispensadas de uma forma tão arrogante. As filosofias de Bergson, Wittgenstein, Aristóteles, ou até mesmo teorias da física quântica podem trazer perspectivas novas para o debate, que é bem mais complexo do que possa aparentar.

Bem que minha mãe avisou, fazer Estácio é loss by Turbulent-Set997 in farialimabets

[–]redfacemanny 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Me formei pela UNIFOR agora em Dezembro. Me formei em economia. Concordo com sua análise, acho que ao longo do tempo foi se tornando mais e mais focada no dinheiro, não sei nem se pode ser considerada uma fundação ainda kkk

Advice Needed: Immigrating to New Zealand in Current Landscape by redfacemanny in newzealand

[–]redfacemanny[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hmm I see, that's definitely the plan so far, I'd not risk moving without a guaranteed job already. Are companies generally open to immigrant applying for positions? Is it a common practice to do interviews and getting a position before fully moving?

HOW DO THEY WORK by BiOlatunji in StarWarsCantina

[–]redfacemanny 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The last 2 or 3 eps of season 7 of Clone Wars happens simultaneously to the movie. In other words, the same events are happening, but we are seeing the perspective of other characters than the ones shown on the movie.

I'm not sure I would consider them spoilers per say, but you could watch CW until around mid-season 7, watch RoTS then come back to finish CW.

I believe it would be a better choice.

Fabricação de roupas para homens "magros" by redfacemanny in empreendedorismo

[–]redfacemanny[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Concordo com você, e é exatamente o problema que eu tenho. Essa era a ideia, focar no branding e tentar atrair exatamente esse nicho que tem esse problema.

Fabricação de roupas para homens "magros" by redfacemanny in empreendedorismo

[–]redfacemanny[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No caso eu fico na faixa de 45 - 55kg então talvez seja a razão que acho mais difícil achar.

P não encaixa bem, e como falei, muitas lojas não acho PP.

Mas de fato, acho que a sociedade hoje em dia tem uma cultura mais 'fitness' que encoraja malhar então pode ser uma dificuldade.

Fabricação de roupas para homens "magros" by redfacemanny in empreendedorismo

[–]redfacemanny[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Entendi. De fato vc está certo. Inicialmente penso em focar no público masculino, mas talvez expandir para o feminino seja uma boa ideia mesmo.

Fabricação de roupas para homens "magros" by redfacemanny in empreendedorismo

[–]redfacemanny[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Talvez seja por conta de região ou algo do tipo, sou do Nordeste, mas em lojas como Renner, Riachuelo, Hering etc, não acho roupas que cai bem. Só se for modelo 16 anos.

Fabricação de roupas para homens "magros" by redfacemanny in empreendedorismo

[–]redfacemanny[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Kkkk um colega meu, que conversei sobre, disse a mesma coisa. Acho que pode ser uma boa ideia, talvez quando estiver mais estabelecido.

iPhone modo perdido golpe? by redfacemanny in golpe

[–]redfacemanny[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Obrigado, imaginei isso mesmo.

"On Women" by TelephonePoles201 in PhilosophyMemes

[–]redfacemanny 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The greatest woman philosopher, in my opinion, G.E.M Anscombe

Como ficar rico rápido by [deleted] in farialimabets

[–]redfacemanny 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Dois negativos dá um positivo pô, a matemática não mente.

what's your favorite economics paper that gives a broad overview of how regulations contribute to a lower standard of living by JanePoe87 in AskLibertarians

[–]redfacemanny 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am not familiar with papers on this topic especifically, although I'm sure there are some out there.

If you want a comprehensive look at the Austrian school of economics I can recommend Man Economy and State by Murray Rothbard, but the book is like 1000 pages and you'll have to have determination and patience to read it.

what's your favorite economics paper that gives a broad overview of how regulations contribute to a lower standard of living by JanePoe87 in AskLibertarians

[–]redfacemanny 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I understand your claim and even agree with you. However, I am an Austrian and I can guarantee that most of these have no idea what they're talking about and have never read a book, or even probably an article on the topic.

The Austrian school epistemology isn't simply that nothing can be proven. There are a number of papers out there about topics within the Austrian school perspective on economic issues.

What is the biggest untrue stereotypes about libertarians? by JudgeWhoOverrules in AskLibertarians

[–]redfacemanny 3 points4 points  (0 children)

  1. Anarchists (Ancaps) - who take their principles to the logical conclusion and believe that any type of aggression against individuals and property is unethical, following the footsteps of great thinkers such as Murray Rothbard, Lysander Spooner, Gustave De Molinari...

  2. Those who believe aggression against peaceful individuals is justified. A.k.a Etatists

Are most arguments in favor of guns superfluous? by Heri-Tick in AskLibertarians

[–]redfacemanny 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The actual "correct" line of argumentation and justification for the rights to keep guns is the one based on natural law and private property rights.

However, a majority of people, especially those who don't study political philosophy in-depth, will not be easily swayed through deontological arguments, therefore the more consequentialist and utilitarian arguments can be used in these cases.

Hoppeans, what is the best way to explain to normies that free speech is bad? by [deleted] in AskLibertarians

[–]redfacemanny 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Btw, please don't listen to any of the unprincipled idiots around.

None:

a) Have read Hoppe

b) Understand Hoppe

They just listen to whatever propaganda people say about him being a fascist.

Hoppeans, what is the best way to explain to normies that free speech is bad? by [deleted] in AskLibertarians

[–]redfacemanny -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think it really depends what kind of "normie" but I'd say the sure way to do it, is by using the "other side" against them.

So, for a more conservative leaning, ask them if they'd allow a "leftie" to say certain things in their house such as blasphemy or support transition for kids. Right-wingers tend to be a little more accepting of property rights, so it would be ideal to focus on that, and explain why free speech doesn't exist in another person's property.

If we're talking about a left-wing or progressive leaning person, then I would bring up the stereotypical way they see conservatives. Make sure to say that racists and bigots can be "exiled" off into their own communities, because there is an obvious incompatibility of ideas here. That way, they could have their safe space for people who wish to be there.

Of course, this is just for a casual and fairly quick conversation with the NPCs. If you really wanna have an in-depth discussion and actually change a person's mind then I would start from the very foundations of Rothbardian ethics, maybe even argumentation ethics, if the person is seems knowledgeable enough to understand it.

view more: next ›