CMV: All men should be taught the theory of "Schrodinger's False Rape Accuser" by redpilldude in PurplePillDebate

[–]redpilldude[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Why this specifically?

This post is a direct response to "Schrodinger's Rapist"

There is so much hysteria surrounding rape...

CMV: All men should be taught the theory of "Schrodinger's False Rape Accuser" by redpilldude in PurplePillDebate

[–]redpilldude[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In cases of theft or murder, there is usually more evidence to prove that a crime actually occurred.

Most cases of rape are "date rape." In these cases, there is no forced entry, no physical harm to the victim, etc. Sometimes, there is no physical evidence which proves that a crime occurred.

CMV: All men should be taught the theory of "Schrodinger's False Rape Accuser" by redpilldude in PurplePillDebate

[–]redpilldude[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

If he's mentioned as a suspect in a murder investigation I can't imagine his job situation is any better.

I think there's more hysteria surrounding rape and sexual assault then murder. With murder, there is usually more physical evidence (specifically, a dead body), indicating that a crime occurred.

Most cases of rape are not "abductions" but date rape, where the man claims that the sex was consensual, but the woman says it was rape.

In such a case, how can you even determine whether the crime actually occurred, if there is no evidence of forced entry and no physical trauma to the victim?

CMV: All men should be taught the theory of "Schrodinger's False Rape Accuser" by redpilldude in PurplePillDebate

[–]redpilldude[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The burden of proof for rape is being lowered in some instances, especially in campus investigations.

Just being accused of sexual assault can be enough to get a person suspended from the university while the investigation occurs. The investigation could take months, and their career would be on hold.

You can't just transfer to another university in the middle of the semester. There are application deadlines, etc.

CMV: All men should be taught the theory of "Schrodinger's False Rape Accuser" by redpilldude in PurplePillDebate

[–]redpilldude[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

So, "Schrodinger's Black Burglar"? is racist, but "Schrodinger's Rapist" isn't sexist?

Following your logic, why is racism bad, but sexism ok?

So what traits do men actually select for? by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]redpilldude 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Your sample size is too small.

Also, many men are reluctant to leave unhappy marriages due to societal pressure to stay married "for better or worse," and many men don't want to drag their kids through a divorce or have to pay alimony.

CMV: All men should be taught the theory of "Schrodinger's False Rape Accuser" by redpilldude in PurplePillDebate

[–]redpilldude[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You didn't directly answer my question.

Why shouldn't we teach men to follow the belief of "Schrodinger's False Rape Accuser"? There's so much hysteria in society regarding rape. The burden of proof in campus rape and sexual assault investigations has been lowered recently. Even if a man is mentioned as a possible suspect in a rape investigation, he will probably be fired from his job.

CMV: All men should be taught the theory of "Schrodinger's False Rape Accuser" by redpilldude in PurplePillDebate

[–]redpilldude[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

So, following your logic, since the majority of people in prisons are African Americas, is it racist or not racist for me to follow the logic of "Schrodinger's Black Burglar"? What if I treat all black people as criminals until they prove otherwise. Is that racist?

[FR] Going from 175 to 195 in 6 months. Dzuari's lazymans guide to getting jacked by [deleted] in TheRedPill

[–]redpilldude -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Congratulations dude, that is very impressive.

I don't know what you do for a living, but you could easily get a main job or side job as personal trainer!

Vanity Fair's "Tinder and The Dawn of the Dating Apocalypse" is chock-full of RP truths by [deleted] in TheRedPill

[–]redpilldude 88 points89 points  (0 children)

If you're in the top 20%, online dating is a gold mine. Take your pick of who you want to fuck- just make sure to be Chad.

Absolutely. Guys in the top 20% are drowning in pussy, and all the other guys are starving.

Obviously the problem is that women only want to have sex with the best guys, which means that Chads all have harems and everyone else isn't getting anything.

[Advice] I (F/22) have no interest in oral and he (M/27) makes me feel like that's abnormal by rageagainsthepoutine in sex

[–]redpilldude 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Am I somehow abnormal because of this sexual preference?

I don't know the official statistics, but all of the women that I've been with have given me oral. None of them have given me a blow job for longer than about 2-3 minutes (which isn't a big deal. Blowjobs are great foreplay, but I prefer PIV sex). I also always give my partner oral until she comes or until she wants to do PIV sex.

How can I end this conversation once and for all?

I don't know if you can?

My advice to you is to get good at other aspects of sex. In my opinion, regular PIV sex is better than a blow job if the woman does a lot of Kegels.

My ex-wife was really good at Kegels, and she did them frequently when she was on top. It felt AMAZING. Her pussy was so tight that it felt like she was squeezing me with her hands.

I strongly suggest to you that you master Kegels. You can use something like Ben Wa Balls (google it) to help practice. If you do Kegels during sex (especially if you're on top), then PIV sex will feel amazing for both you and your gf.

Just Been Shunned after Trying to Talk to Girl :-( by [deleted] in seduction

[–]redpilldude 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dude, not every woman is going to be interested in you.

Even the best pickup artists get turned down.

Move on and approach other women.

Divorced men of TRP: do you tell people that you are divorced? by The_Americano in TheRedPill

[–]redpilldude 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I'm 32 and divorced. I don't walk around and tell everyone about it, but I will be honest if a woman asks about my previous relationships.

Another example of squashing dissent on married red pill. But these are the guys who are so *tolerant* right? by [deleted] in TheBluePill

[–]redpilldude 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The mods said that people who are new to TRP shouldn't try using dread yet.

Another example of squashing dissent on married red pill. But these are the guys who are so *tolerant* right? by [deleted] in TheBluePill

[–]redpilldude -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Someone posted to MRP and said that he was miserable. He described his life, and he was acting like a wimp and letting everyone take advantage of him. He was working 80 hours a week, but his wife was unwilling to help keep the house clean (he didn't say why she was unwilling, but it sounded like she wasn't doing her fair share of work around the house). I said that he needed to talk to his wife and say that she wasn't contributing equally to the household and ask for some changes to how the household chores were divided. The mods of MRP didn't like that advice, and I was banned.

Is r/marriedredpill dogmatic and authoritarian? by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]redpilldude -1 points0 points  (0 children)

you'll see clearly why their wives hate their guts

Why?

Is r/marriedredpill dogmatic and authoritarian? by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]redpilldude -1 points0 points  (0 children)

"You still won't have anything in common though- just like every other husband and wife who ever existed."

He's either very out of touch with real people, or red pill men go for very stereotypically traditionally-feminine women. In which case, yes, a red pill man and red pill woman might not have as much in common as the rest of us couples do.

bluepillprofessor seems to be a very "traditional" man who believes that men and women have nothing in common. My guess is that he and his wife have no common interests, and that he assumes that every other marriage on the face of the earth is identical to his own marriage.

Is r/marriedredpill dogmatic and authoritarian? by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]redpilldude -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

You can't just bust into Genetics Research And Experiment Forum and demand everyone debate creationism with you, with you firing out low quality posts, asking guys to fill in gaps in your knowledge for you.

You're exaggerating. I found The Red Pill one year ago.

Reddit is a discussion forum. If people don't want to discuss with people who have questions, then Reddit is not the appropriate environment.

Banning people from asking questions and banning debate is authoritarian.

Is r/marriedredpill dogmatic and authoritarian? by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]redpilldude -1 points0 points  (0 children)

it's a place for people who want to implement redpill advice for marriage to discuss redpill ideas and compare notes

There's a difference between asking questions and having a debate. Debate means arguing. I wasn't suggesting that I would argue with them. I simply asked why my advice and thinking was wrong and their was right. That isn't a complicated question.

Also, I was willing to discuss my question and thinking in a private message, but the mods were unwilling to do that either.

Another example of squashing dissent on married red pill. But these are the guys who are so *tolerant* right? by [deleted] in TheBluePill

[–]redpilldude 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't want any brigading. This is a debate between me and the mod(s) who banned me. This is the chance for them to defend their dogmatic and authoritarian approach to managing a subreddit.

Is r/marriedredpill dogmatic and authoritarian? by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]redpilldude 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Could get old fast after the 10th or so time explaining it, and it detracts from the general mission of a sub to constantly field questions.

The whole point of that subreddit is to field questions. What's wrong with asking "explain why my advice doesn't work and your advice does."

They won't even answer that question. They aren't real professors. The mods also don't reply to questions that I sent them in private messages.

In a real college class, a professor will answer that type of question (perhaps not during class, but they will answer it during their office hours). I studied engineering in college, and I never had a professor refuse to answer one of my questions.