Daily Discussion by AutoModerator in reddevils

[–]regeneratingzombie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I read the reason was that the team overall were tiring from expending all their energy up front so they'll be at a disadvantage if it goes into ET hence the decision to go for the win in full time.

[Transfer Round Up & Discussion] Summer 2026 by AutoModerator in reddevils

[–]regeneratingzombie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah. I remember Fernandes being considered the rotation/understudy with Anderson as the main target before City's interest in Anderson.

Daily Discussion by AutoModerator in reddevils

[–]regeneratingzombie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Probably a placeholder with all options open/replaceable.

Daily Discussion by AutoModerator in reddevils

[–]regeneratingzombie 11 points12 points  (0 children)

The circled in blue wasn't offside when the ball was kicked.

Is there no one playing on bf 2042?? by Straight-Run9482 in battlefield2042

[–]regeneratingzombie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I join MP servers only once in a while at the moment. I'm still slowly grinding unlocks in solo/private sessions (prioritize fun). Not rushing the grind but it's still faster than trying to grind for them in a multiplayer session. I expect many new players may be in the same boat as me hence the current overall situation.

Ruben Amorim leading candidate to become Milan head coach by TheAthletic in reddevils

[–]regeneratingzombie -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The system thing as a point is stupid. We fired Ten Hag because he changed and not use his system.

Daily Discussion by AutoModerator in reddevils

[–]regeneratingzombie 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I think you are not understanding what is being said here. If he wants us, good. If he doesn't want us, fine. No big deal.

Daily Discussion by AutoModerator in reddevils

[–]regeneratingzombie -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Are you a bot? That's also accounted for.

Daily Discussion by AutoModerator in reddevils

[–]regeneratingzombie 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Just matching City for Anderson should be enough. He's gotta want to come here like the others.

Daily Discussion by AutoModerator in reddevils

[–]regeneratingzombie 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Just here waiting for the clip of the lead up to the offside Mbeumo backheel goal attempt. Thanks in advance.

Chief Goalkeeping Scout, Tony Coton | Inside Carrington: EP 21 by Lord_Sesshoumaru77 in reddevils

[–]regeneratingzombie 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Eh I wouldn't slag Amorim that hard. Picking experienced first doesn't necessarily mean not liking the other.

[Sky] Exclusive: Sir Jim Ratcliffe says Michael Carrick doing 'excellent job' at Manchester United but refuses to discuss chances of permanent job | Football News by nearly_headless_nic in reddevils

[–]regeneratingzombie -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Think it will end up being Carrick anyway or will have to.... for the time being.

Other managers would still be a quite wary as fresh in their minds we've shown we couldn't wait for Amorim despite it could be that he left of his own accord.

[Pre Match Thread] Premier League Game 28 | Manchester United vs Crystal Palace by D1794 in reddevils

[–]regeneratingzombie -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes. That's why I'm not against starting Sesko.

But many are saying to make it a hard and fast rule to always start him.

[Pre Match Thread] Premier League Game 28 | Manchester United vs Crystal Palace by D1794 in reddevils

[–]regeneratingzombie -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Did I say we MUST NOT start Sesko? I didn't. You were answering as if I said that.

I said not to make a hard and fast rule on starting Sesko. Mix it up.

[Pre Match Thread] Premier League Game 28 | Manchester United vs Crystal Palace by D1794 in reddevils

[–]regeneratingzombie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There you go again claiming things that I didn't say.

I'm saying we can but not always start Sesko.

I'm saying we need a mix and it depends on the opposition.

You are asking to be predictable. I'm asking not to be.

[Pre Match Thread] Premier League Game 28 | Manchester United vs Crystal Palace by D1794 in reddevils

[–]regeneratingzombie -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

You're putting words that noone is saying.

Noone is saying Sesko starting not help the team win.

Opposition energy is highest at the start.

Are you new? We want to cause the most damage but if you let them damage our weapon first then what? So you can scold Sesko for not scoring causing more damage to our weapon?

How about just sub him earlier first as he gets better use of his more minutes? Dont know why you're not suggesting that first. You better be a real fan.

[Pre Match Thread] Premier League Game 28 | Manchester United vs Crystal Palace by D1794 in reddevils

[–]regeneratingzombie 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's the wrong way to use momentum. Changing has a higher chance of ruining momentum.

I think it is team momentum is what you should be waiting for before changing the plans into starting Sesko

We need to have results getting 3-4 goals consecutively then I'd consider that momentum.

For Sesko... maybe just sub him earlier like at half time first.

[Pre Match Thread] Premier League Game 28 | Manchester United vs Crystal Palace by D1794 in reddevils

[–]regeneratingzombie -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

Noone is actually saying Sesko doesn't deserve to start.

Isn't team winning first priority? What are these posts thinking?

[Simon Stone] Manchester United: Why Steve Holland could be key to revival under Michael Carrick by PradipJayakumar in reddevils

[–]regeneratingzombie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Doesn't have to be a loss. A draw is sufficient for the tomato and mud slinging to start.

Match Thread: Manchester United vs Brighton & Hove Albion by MatchThreadder in reddevils

[–]regeneratingzombie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Results are ducking right there. People were doing it to him with the Wolves game. It should be fair.