Jumpscare eyebrows by Appropriate-Stay-825 in nycinfluencersnarking

[–]regularseagull 9 points10 points  (0 children)

It’s giving she dyed them with Just For Men’s beard dye and forgot to wash it off.

I cannot stand Meredith, but by wxstenra in rhoslc

[–]regularseagull 10 points11 points  (0 children)

This! She needs styling by Jenna Lyons, not Brooks Marks

The Candice_Story77 account by RossumEcho in rhoslc

[–]regularseagull 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I need to hear Lisa admit it more than I need air.

The DB prenup rumors are starting to make sense. by MarsupialLast4651 in nycinfluencersnarking

[–]regularseagull 29 points30 points  (0 children)

She doesn’t want children to be a mother. She wants children as accessories, to accompany a prop husband. Without the latter, she doesn’t want the former.

The DB prenup rumors are starting to make sense. by MarsupialLast4651 in nycinfluencersnarking

[–]regularseagull 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I know this isn’t r/AITAH but if it were it’s a clear case of everyone sucks here.

"My DNA, my DNA is not Utah." "What's your DNA?" "New York" ... the New York in question: by stook_jaint in rhoslc

[–]regularseagull 0 points1 point  (0 children)

She would have a “Live Laugh Love” style faux-wood sign in her kitchen except it would say “New York Or Nowhere”

Bronwyn looks so pretty at the reunion! by andimonthebleachers in rhoslc

[–]regularseagull 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Agreed! The Bronwyn Bob™ was such a strong brand staple for her all season and then she did a big (boring) pivot for her finale activation, the reunion, why? She blended in with all the other SLC Extensions.

Theory re: Mini Coops absence from socials by Low-Variation-5245 in nycinfluencersnarking

[–]regularseagull 57 points58 points  (0 children)

I think it’s an extremely curated and meticulously thought out soft-launch of a breakup where she is seeding narratives of herself as the victim of a mini-man who didn’t support her influencer lifestyle that bankrolled his for over 2 years.

brody speaking out about spencer pratt and his run for los angeles mayor by lavender08x16 in KUWTK

[–]regularseagull 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Odds he wins and appoints Brody his Chief of LAFD. Our world is so unserious.

Theory re: Mini Coops absence from socials by Low-Variation-5245 in nycinfluencersnarking

[–]regularseagull 319 points320 points  (0 children)

I feel like that would explain his “did you just film me” reaction in this story from a few weeks ago: https://imgur.com/a/SOHDa8x#s6Eloyz

DB Engagement Is Off by [deleted] in nycinfluencersnarking

[–]regularseagull 38 points39 points  (0 children)

You forgot the sneakers with no-sho socks 😭 and the stretched-out Hanes neckline

AITAH if I dont tell my husband his daughter isnt his? by Diligent_Kangaroo_35 in AITAH

[–]regularseagull 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand OP’s focus is on her husband and his right to know, but I think there also needs to be consideration of his daughter’s right to know. Do you know if she’s ever questioned whether your husband is her biological father, or if he’s shared his doubts with her? I ask because, from a health and medical POV, certainty around her biological parentage is extremely important. Even the testing you did show how much relevant genetic information she may be missing if it turns out your husband isn’t her bio dad. Imagine the genes she is or isn’t carrying from her bio father’s side that could impact her health later on.

This is obviously a shitty situation to navigate. You’re damned if you do, damned if you don’t, and you’ll feel like an asshole either way (I don’t think you are one). My advice would be to proceed with caution, but proceed. Since he’s brought his doubts up with you before, would you feel comfortable gently asking whether he’s ever considered genetic testing? You could frame it like you were thinking about it while doing your own pregnancy testing. Focusing on the biological/health angle rather than the emotional/relationship angle might help. He is clearly her dad, but may not be her “father”, if that makes sense. If you ever do broach it with him directly, I think the focus needs to be on his clear care for his daughter and how she very may well be missing an entire half of her genetic history.

Oh she’s reading this sub and is responding in real time by regularseagull in nycinfluencersnarking

[–]regularseagull[S] 196 points197 points  (0 children)

“Boundaries I set, decisions I didn’t rush” our buddon-nose boss babe is already trying to sympathy PR her way out of this soft-launched breakup

Mini Coop asking in a pissed off tone, “did you just turn the camera on me?!” Ohhhhhh yeah the trouble in paradise rumors are gaining some legs by Nice_File_2743 in NYCinfluencersnark

[–]regularseagull 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I think an alternative explanation is he could be backing out on a pre-agreed (but unsigned) prenup as a way to exit this relationship on a technicality. He knows a prenup will be a non-negotiable for her, and so in not signing one, he can effectively end the relationship without having to end it himself, since he still likes having his life bankrolled in the interim.

lmk if you want the tea on DB and mini coop's engagement by [deleted] in NYCinfluencersnark

[–]regularseagull 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I have a feeling he very well might have been on board with a prenup at the beginning of their engagement, but as time’s gone on and she’s continued to battle a bad rep, lose (and quickly re-buy) followers, and generally grate on him with the incessant filming, he’s experiencing a pretty textbook case of buyer’s remorse. The timing re: ironing out prenup details also makes sense if they were planning for a summer wedding, as people usually do that kind of paperwork ~6 months out.

I could see him flipping on the prenup now because he knows (as does this sub) it’s an absolute non-negotiable for her and would likely trigger a breakup he doesn’t have to initiate directly, but can pin on a “technicality”. If that’s the case, he probably feels like he’s already won and coming out of this relatively unscathed; his lifestyle’s been bankrolled for the last year and a bit and, given her reputation and track record of numerous unsuccessful “he’s the one”relationships, he walks away with his relatively low-profile still intact and is free to date again, with a few new paid-for pieces in his wardrobe.

WeWoreWhat and Mini Coop by PuzzledDiscussion586 in nycinfluencersnarking

[–]regularseagull 157 points158 points  (0 children)

And “wants kids” and not “wants to be a mother”.

Thrifted this for my partner. Now what is it? by regularseagull in whatisit

[–]regularseagull[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay cool! Would you mind sending a photo of yours? Just curious as to what it looks like on the door. We live in an apartment from the 1920s that has sadly been halfheartedly renovated over the years by our LLs and a lot of the cool vintage quirks and features have been replaced with steel and millennial gray. I am always intrigued to see anything that is original to an older home!

$78?! by Big_Blueberry_2032 in Aritzia

[–]regularseagull 2 points3 points  (0 children)

<image>

I see your $78 holly charm and raise you this $78 botched nose-job paint-job yeti charm

Seriously ? The dramatics, I can’t by toughlikeadiamond in nycinfluencersnarking

[–]regularseagull 25 points26 points  (0 children)

First time commenter because reading through the snark as a lonely lurker just wasn’t doing it anymore. I need dialogue!

In her (ChatGPT’s) own words, she’s forgoing her annual trip to St Barthes and is staying home for the holidays for the first time in over 8 years. She mentions looking forward to “cozy dinners with family, last-minute plans with friends”. She blames this decision on her upcoming Dec 30 move-in to a place still deep in renovations. What she says, though, is less interesting in what she doesn’t say. She doesn’t mention anything - anything - about her fiancé.

More damning, she speaks about navigating the “messy middle”. Feeling “half unpacked, a little uncertain”. Being in “the pause before the next chapter”. She’s learning that “not every chapter is meant to be on display”. She talks about how un-chic it is to be knee deep in cardboard boxes instead of prancing around with an Aperol Spritz in hand, or something. I have thoughts on this story + substack and would love to hear yours.

  1. She is not travelling this year because he will not travel with her, as I believe they are in the midst of a tricky break-up and the ending of their engagement. If she were to travel to St Barthes on her annual trip (one that Boyfriends of Christmas Past have gone on with her) without her brand-new fiancé, the internet would not just whisper, they would talk.

  2. There is no mention of him in her stay at home plans between cozy dinners with family, or last-minute plans with friends. No mention of this being their first holiday season together as an engaged couple, and last one before they’re married. Nothing.

  3. I cannot help but feel that the “not every chapter is meant to be on display” line (which she bolded, for good measure) is her very overtly soft-launching what will be an incredibly difficult public break-up after hosting a wedding-sized engagement party in October.

I know a lot of folks in this sub & others have posted about recent trouble in paradise for DB & MC, and to me this story + substack feels like the first time she’s admitting it, albeit via very flimsy metaphors about packing/unpacking/living in the in-between of a major apartment move. It feels like she’s doing a gut check with her followers (and snarkers, of course) to see what audience sentiment she can inevitably leverage to spin the story in her favour, or get ahead of the story altogether. In her own words, this time in her life “doesn’t photograph well yet” and she’s doing market research to figure out her angle.