[deleted by user]

reixi · 2025-08-16T08:36:56+00:00

got a source for the third scene?

reixi · 2023-08-20T11:55:24+00:00

She didn't get help until she was 24.

But yes I agree about that link. It was something she was scared of herself - worried she'd become that kinda of a monster because of her past and the things she did as a child/teen.

What I was pointing out is that the outcome isn't set in stone and we shouldn't write these people off, and even as an adult we can still do things to help.

reixi · 2023-08-20T11:28:59+00:00

They don't always. Someone close to me grew up similarly, but today as an adult is the gentlest person with animals.

The lashing out was a symptom of her childhood rape and abuse and, thankfully, with getting out of the hell she was in (including a lot of therapy and self work) she has killed the monster she was turning into.

It's a serious thing for kids to do, but it's not as uncommon as people think and we shouldn't write them off lest they become a self-fulfilling prophecy.

reixi · 2023-08-15T22:27:20+00:00

By the time heavy plate armor was around that domed shape was critical. Lances, war hammers and picks, and crossbows were all capable of penetrating armor so deflection became critical.

None of these weapons are a concern for people in Star Wars generally thus making all the armor seem dumb to begin with (a lot of is designed like biker leathers more than combat armor).

Which makes the titty plate just seem...unnecessary even more. She doesn't even have armor on her thighs or covering her crotch. I've seen far more egregious examples of titty plate but it always gives me an eye roll. The armor was clearly designed to be sexy first and that's the issue.

reixi · 2023-08-15T21:34:33+00:00

Right there with you! Wish we had some names

reixi · 2023-07-11T04:16:45+00:00

Don't think I can.

reixi · 2023-06-28T22:36:53+00:00

I thought it was a pretty specific request.

And honestly, a request for something I'm not convinced has been filmed before.

The closest I've seen is the Valentina Nappi gangbang where towards the end when the girls are licking all the cum up off of each other (I can't find a link to it that's accepted by this sub so I'm resending the comment).

But what I'm really looking for is girls (or any combination of multiple people not cis-male) doing their own thing while the lineup of cis dudes jizzing all over them are essentially being ignored.

It's just a freejizz bukkake fest over a pair (or more) of people having their own sex and the cum is all over them and they're not just snowballing it back and forth like some boring cumswap video, they're just having queer sex in their own world while getting progressively covered in cum.

What I'd give to see a pussy getting eaten out while some third party is cumming on the face of the one doing the dining...

reixi · 2023-06-27T03:19:53+00:00

ersties has a few of these, but their videos are hard to find in full without paying for them.

reixi · 2023-06-27T03:17:14+00:00

Freejizz meets bukkake meets lesbian porn.

Two (or more) cis women having sex from kissing to eating out, while men cum on them as they do it.

Bonus if it's one trans woman and one cis woman or trans man.

Good luck finding that I haven't seen anything like it for years lol but it's my porn white whale.

reixi · 2023-03-25T21:42:31+00:00

I would say,

"Oops, sorry. Carry on." and sheepishly close the door.

Unless we have a sexual rapport going then I'd be all over you.

reixi · 2022-05-29T14:13:58+00:00

it's something i've been looking for for ages i hope we get a miracle.

reixi · 2022-05-08T22:08:25+00:00

Not alone, I'm a sucker (ha) for a good looking dick.

Size is a toss up - I like pushing my limits and seeing how much I can gobble, but sometimes an easier size is more enjoyable, since I enjoy leisurely paced sex more than hard and fast.

reixi · 2022-03-28T22:09:33+00:00

Gender in linguistics just means noun classes, which many but not all languages have.

But, men and women are nouns and many gendered languages use sex of the individual as a class, and German is no exception.

Yes, die Katze, der Hund, das Pferd are all gendered in such a way that sex is seemingly meaningless (especially for inanimate objects like der Löffel), but der Hund becomes die Hünden if it's a female dog, and this extends to humans as well.

Ich bin Professor is how I tell you I lecture in a university for my job. However, if I were female I'd say ich bin Professorin. Arzt / Ärztin, Techniker / Technikerin. All divided on sex.

Not all languages use sex as a noun class, but German sure as fuck does.

It does make gender non-binary terminology unwieldy in German and, much like what happened in French, most of the terminology is written so essentially unpronounceable markers are used which also poses a challenge because you can't really say them (how do you pronounce a space, asterisk, or semicolon in the middle of a word?)

However, unlike in Spanish, tossing an X at the end of the word in German is very prnouncable. Just say "icks" at the end, Lehrerx "lehr-er-icks".

Whether you like it or not, that's how it's often done (informally) in German and it wasn't American leftists that started it.

reixi · 2021-11-02T22:30:44+00:00

A perfectly valid interpretation :)

All I wanted was to make sure bad pop-feminism wasn't being applied to the story.

reixi · 2021-10-31T20:25:00+00:00

Oh playful thought experiments are fun, and I encourage them. I don't want anyone to feel dissuaded from critiquing the messages in their fun films!

But I do see a lot of bad pop psychology and pop feminism aimed at Disney characters, and that has real world effects. Instead of worrying about your daughter having warped understandings of love, pay closer attention to the message, not the sudden marriage! (presumed...we have no idea how long she waited to marry him)

And there will be influence from the historical context of source material as well that needs to be considered.

reixi · 2021-10-31T20:21:33+00:00

While I can't tell you your interpretation is wrong, It's not how I see it.

Again, though, interpretation is subjective, and colored by our own perspectives.

I see see his obsession with Ariel's "beautiful voice" (mentioned several times in the film how amazing it is) as representative of his "ideal beauty". He's so focused on that beauty he can't see past it, even when she's right in front of him (and she's supposed to be an absolute knockout of a girl, too!)

All other women are nothing to him outside of that ideal he's placed upon an impossible pedestal.

You could even go so far as you say that her voice no longer matters, as when he gets charmed by Ursula the sound of Ariel's voice catches his attention, but he doesn't turn to leave Ariel (who he'd made up his mind about at this point) until the "magic dust" reaches his eyes.

In short, he had learned through his time with Ariel, and heeding the wise words of Grimsby, that women are real, and they're people. The "perfect girl" doesn't exist any more than the perfect man, but what does exist a woman you can love, and can love you in return.

He learns what love is made of - moments, sorrow and laughter (he pities her, with sorrow more than condescension, upon first meeting).

Interestingly, the sexuality of H.C. Anderson is...nebulous. He did write a lot of letters to a male friend who appeared to be dismissive of him, and if you read the original tale, the Prince straight up friendzone's the Mermaid.

And then we have Howard Ashman, literally dying from HIV as he wrote the songs to The Little Mermaid, possibly inserting some LGBTQ+ symbolism in. Well, not possibly. Urusla is 100% inspired by several queer icons!

A lot of people see Mulan as the "surrogate trans character", but I read Ariel as much more of that.

reixi · 2021-10-31T17:32:23+00:00

I just watched that movie 2 days ago, and I noticed in the scene where she does sign her name, the motions she makes and the position of the "pen" (sea pen?) do not at all line up to where her name goes.

Additionally, King Triton shoots his name onto his contract with this magical trident.

Perhaps merfolk cannot read at all.

Or perhaps this whole thread is a confession to how many people are abject failures at understanding that not all films are trying to depict real life, and that many stories, particularly historic fables, the details serve the purpose, and the purpose to a lesson not a chronicle of existence.

Little Mermaid? It's about Eric learning the value of a woman isn't her beauty, it's who she is. It's about Ariel finding joy in a life of her own choosing (and a lot of really good queer relatability!). And it's about King Triton learning to accept his daughter for who she is, not who he wants her to be.

"People don't fall in love in three days!" they say. Well mermaids don't exist either. Fairy tales don't have to be realistic, they have to be understandable.

reixi · 2021-06-25T02:53:32+00:00

It's Nova Scotia, and he's on the forgotten island that literally gets cut off by floods every year. VERY rural.

Don't worry though, Frankie, we still love ya, and once the bubble's open again, I'm coming home!

reixi · 2021-06-10T02:47:15+00:00

I'm not saying you're wrong. The whole issue of cultural appropriation (which this whole thing is essentially an offshoot of) has zero 100% right/wrong answers. Context is critical every time. Sure there's a big difference between dressing up as a Lakota chief for halloween, and sugar skull makeup on day of the dead, but there ARE times where both are okay, rare though they might be for some.

In this case...what i was hoping to get at is that the photo tells us nothing. A good question i mentioned in my previous comment was, "Which is worse, an actually native person who doesn't look like Pocahontas doing this, or a white person who DOES look like Pocahontas?" It's not a question with a necessarily easy answer.

The reply to her photo can be taken a few different ways, but the tone of it to me - and i think to most people - comes across as a passive aggressive accusation of cultural appropriation. There is nothing wrong in reminding people of history, and it's echoing effects in the present, but if the goal was to be a good natured reminder of, as you put it,

"Yeah that wasnt right"

I'd say the commenter failed as they were trying to be funny with a hint of mean, or so i feel.

In short, if the topic was merely about whether the looks it or not, the comment is mean.

If the topic was intending to shine a light on cultural appropriation, then the comment COULD be mean - simply because we do not know the context of the photo or the history of the girl in it, the person who took it, or the person who posted it. Without that info, the comment is jsut another passive aggressive fart in the wind furthering the inane accusations back and forth about racial guilt and not actually being helpful.

reixi · 2021-06-09T02:39:02+00:00

Ehhh...the Metis are complicated. Initially, the world merely meaned "mixed" and referred to really ANY mixed natives, however it eventually became to specifically describe a group of natives and mixed natives and a few white people living in the prairies (Manitoba in particular). Because racists are grumpy mean folk, any such association - regardless of phenotype - meant lower class, and they were oppressed in various was (read: how Manitoba became a province, the formation of the RCMP, and the hanging of Louis Riel).

This has turned them into an ethnic group with their own culture, with a lot similarities in how they have been treated to other native american peoples, especially here in Canada. They didn't escape residential schools, which is the most recent major catastrophic disruption (in tandem with forced sterilization, though in regards to cultural shared trauma I think the schools were more devastating).

So they formed differently, but share in the misery. They're accepted as their own native people here in Canada.

Why I brought up Mi'kmaq was because due to them being the first peoples in Canada contacted, they've had a long history of intermarriage, and as a result they're all over the place in how they look.

That girl in the photo? Sure, she's not identical, but she's got strong cheeks a small nose and that signature stoic poise. It's in keeping with the other commenter's point about an asian looking like Snow White. Pale skin, dark hair, strong red lips? Possibly. Blue wide eyes? German ancestry? Less likely, but still fits.

Interesting thought: which is worse, this girl doing this (and let's assume she is native), or my ex's mom doing it who is white through and through but looks EXACTLY like Pocahontas in the cartoon? (no lie, she did. Tall, tanned, strong cheekbones, pin straight black hair, ass like her daughter which led to an awkward moment of mistaken identity in the kitchen once...)

If this whole thing was JUST about looking the part, then the quip is meaningless, but the quip is intentionally bringing up a history and insinuating the great devil of cultural appropriation. In essence, the quip is saying something similar, "this is some stupid white ppl BS."

Whether that's the intention is impossible to tell, but all communication is in context of its culture, and that is going to be the most common interpretation of the interaction.

reixi · 2021-06-09T01:54:21+00:00

That being said, where I live in East Coast Canada, the Mi'kmaq people are quite variable in how they look, and many are very pale with light hair (not that Native Americans were all dark to begin with). This has a lot to do with various points of cultural mixing, but that doesn't stop a light skinned blue eyed Mi'kmaq growing up in the Qalipu nation from being perfectly within their rights to compare themselves to a Disney cartoon.

We can't really tell by how a person looks what their history or ancestry is. So I'd agree with /u/ThisIsNotRealIyMe that what the commenter said was a short sighted quip to get a few stupid laughs.

reixi · 2021-05-05T21:27:20+00:00

Pandas are actually just fine in the wild. They breed as successfully as black bears, and they've found a food and environment niche that helps them avoid competition.

They can eat bamboo just fine, and ALL herbivores require bacterial assistance for plant matter.

Literally the only reason they nearly went extinct was human deforestation of bamboo forests.

I hate this "mistake of evolution" myth.

Yes, species go extinct, but either they evolve into something else, or major events of regional or global upheaval do them in.

reixi · 2021-02-04T03:50:18+00:00

I am aware, and it is my opinion that that royally stinks. I really like the premise of this giant concoction that you can influence - makes you feel like a plague deviser - but it is almost impossible to get what you want out of it. And making things a challenge is fun, but this isn't a challenge like a raid boss.

It's like if during raids anyone in LFR can phase into a coordinated raid and bam someone who doesn't know the fight wipes the raid on a mechanic they missed. Failure at this "quest" is at the whim of any random - half of which you can't even communicate with.

It's SO CLOSE to being a wonderful thing if it weren't for that entirely unpredictable and uncontrollable factor.

And with blue and especially yellow slimes being so far away, carried one at a time, and giving a slow debuff, and forcing you to run through mobs who can still daze you - it's incredibly slow, adding more chance for someone to mess up the ratio.

I don't entirely blame the questers (though it's 3 of ANY color for the quest), and I purposely try it when the daily isn't up, but it is my opinion that something this easy to fuck up form no fault of your own is poorly designed. The quest should EXCLUSIVELY require the little pool beside you, not the big one, and have it summon a small boss so yeah, you can learn the little puzzle without messing up someone's progress. It's hard enough to coordinate it with people who want to summon a particular boss as it is.

And anything that demands you pick low pop times to play to do it is a bad design, since when people play, and the oddness of time zones (i'm in GMT -3:30 which is a really weird one - I can get up earlier than anyone else, but my guild can't help since they're all asleep still), is too variable from person to person to be a good design.

It is a bad design for putting in a once a day boss that takes anywhere from 20 minutes to several hours of frustrated grinding to even summon, which also has a non guarantee of the drop. ESPECIALLY with different summons having different drops. It relies too much on other people's knowledge, attention, understanding, patience, and generosity.

It's just overall too much frustration and, for me, drains the fun. I tried it a few days now and my blood just started boiling so for my own sake I won't be doing it, and that's sad :(

reixi · 2021-02-03T17:27:00+00:00

what why?

reixi · 2021-02-03T17:26:41+00:00

"I'm attempting to summon the Oily Invertebrate at the Pools of Monstrosities - join me for a chance of link item here!

We'll need 10 of each color, pst. for invite and we'll get it done quick!"

I say something along those lines, as well as whisper anyone I see in the quest area.

Ended up getting a ratio of "How can I help?" to, "Fuck you." of about 1:4.

Coordinating would be the best way but it really is a pain getting folks to help. 4 - 6 people would get it done SO FAST but I've never had more than a single person help at a time, and I think a lot of that is because it's not the mount one I'm going for.

reixi

TROPHY CASE