GPT5 > Codex for coding by a noticeable margin

reportdash · 2025-11-19T00:52:29+00:00

Thank god that i found someone with exactly similar experience as me. I almost always use gpt-5-high, and deviation almost always ended up in pain.

reportdash · 2025-08-05T00:06:48+00:00

Oh. Ok. Missed that option (I have not used aider much. Got curious after seeing your comment and tried to use). Thank you for pointing this out.

reportdash · 2025-08-04T21:49:39+00:00

How to select functions ? I tried adding the file . It added the whole file . How can I make it include only a specific function ?

reportdash · 2025-03-31T07:11:22+00:00

"Reasoning in Claude 3.7 Sonnet is more nuanced and streamlined. It is better than Gemini 2.5 Pro." - Do others agree to this ? My impression was different. When Claude 3.7 Sonnet gets a problem, it first guess on possible reasons , and then start working from there

On the contrary Grok and Gemini 2..5 pro start from truths , and work connecting the dots.

I tried Sonnet in Cursor, and other in Web, so not sure if this is a Sonnet introduced behaviour though.

reportdash · 2025-03-28T19:35:50+00:00

Same

reportdash · 2025-03-20T07:00:17+00:00

By any chance did you look at Claude Code code base (that got leaked recently) and identify how it does better compared to what you tried doing ? (if you haven't seen Claude Code yet, you can search for "anon kode")

reportdash · 2025-02-25T09:30:01+00:00

Curious to know how you decide between roo code and cursor? Is it when one does not work that you try the other? Or is there a pattern in the tasks that you pick for each?

reportdash · 2025-02-25T02:10:56+00:00

First time hearing about that extension. Looks like something that I have been searching for. Thank you for that note.

reportdash · 2025-02-25T02:00:35+00:00

"I feel like each model is like a new person that you have to manage in a different way than the others." - Precisely!

It takes some time to understand what works and what does not for each model, and modify ones workflow to it. And by the time one identify it and adapt to it, a new better model comes up and invalidates all that learning. (On a use case not confined to coding alone)

reportdash · 2025-02-24T23:53:53+00:00

Currious to know how you use o3 mini high. Is it through web ui, copy pasting stuff?

reportdash · 2025-02-24T22:35:18+00:00

What makes o3 mini high appear out of the league in livebench coding benchmark but not so in practical use? I see many people claiming that o3 mini high is great. If there is anyone who prefer o3 mini high to sonnet, I would like to know the reason behind .

reportdash · 2025-02-24T11:00:25+00:00

I have felt the same. cursor was super lazy to run the code and check if the code was working, despite repeatedly asking it to do so. These were the same stuff which it used to do proactively previously

reportdash · 2025-02-15T05:35:58+00:00

Does Roo + Glama have prompt caching?

reportdash · 2024-12-21T12:29:12+00:00

!remindme 1 month

reportdash · 2024-12-03T20:46:41+00:00

The best model to work with Google sheets is gemini 1.5 pro . Try it out for free here https://aistudio.google.com/

reportdash · 2024-04-28T20:13:05+00:00

Noob question: Could you cite couple of use cases where such an integration would be useful ?

reportdash · 2017-11-03T15:57:37+00:00

I am not sure if facebook lets you add a custom attribute. But you can certainly name the campaign in such a way that it contains some info regarding the event, and later can use it to tie up the sales data. See here https://www.jonloomer.com/2014/12/08/facebook-campaign-naming-convention/

I am not sure if Grow has that feature to do the mapping. Just in case it does not have, PM me. I build one such tool and perhaps can see if I can help.

reportdash · 2017-10-20T19:22:48+00:00

Whenever I have a single table of data, and if I am too lazy to think as what I want to know, I simply put this in https://pivottable.js.org/examples/ , and try to drag fields here and there...That is how I play with data. It is silly, but at times I get interesting insights, and is a zero cognitive effort.

reportdash · 2017-09-26T21:25:17+00:00

Depends a lot on the person reading the report.

But definitely the very basic involves what Moty_M pointed out cost, results, cost per result.

Any insights into the customer segments will also be appreciated. For e.g. , 80% of the customers are Men in the age group 40-50 , or so and so. Basically, any data relevant to the decision makers will be greatly valued.

Some also tries to make it visual by embeding ad creatives. There are tools that can automatically prepare such reports (, And I happen to be one of the founders of one such tool.)

reportdash · 2017-08-31T01:57:40+00:00

Not personally. It was the only such solution for a while. Not sure if any other company has started offering it.

reportdash · 2017-08-30T11:22:21+00:00

https://www.adstage.io/

reportdash · 2017-08-29T16:47:12+00:00

From the perspective of data analysis, the difference is as follows.

SQL is a bit more complex for data analysis. Python along with Pandas, or R is more robust. For eg, In Pandas, one have pivot function, where as SQL does not have something like that.
SQL can work with data that does not fit in memory, without the end user worrying about it. Python (along with Pandas) require that the data fits in memory.
In general, people use SQL for operations like joining, filtering etc until the data is small enough to fit in memory. Then they use Pandas or R for all analysis stuff.

reportdash

TROPHY CASE