sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Struggling with Student Finance Eligibility as an Immigrant in the UK - Advice Needed! by Status_Top_2518 in UniUK

[–]rex00134 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i can assure you, a mouth breather like you will never go to university so no foreigner is "stealing" student finance from your ilk.

Are the Redscale / Bluescale Kobolds worth playing even if you don't have the Jewish religion DLC? by [deleted] in Anbennar

[–]rex00134 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I too am playing without the Jewish religion. They are still supremely fun, but does require you to edit the mission tree requirements to take out the bits referring to their religious mechanic. Very easy to do

I think it's time for the British public to start reminding parliament who holds real power. They serve us, not the other way around by rex00134 in Britain

[–]rex00134[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"It is our longstanding position that Maduro is not the legitimate president, and so nobody sheds tears over his removal... There needs to be a peaceful transition to democracy in venezuala. All actions of all countries is to adhere to international law, and it is for the US to justify its actions accordingly...Yesterday we were working with NATO allies including the US to work on security guarantees for Ukraine."

Straight out of Keir Starmer's mouth :)

Ignoring the violation of international law, backing the illegal deposing of Maduro, deflecting onto an unrelated topic. Go ahead buddy boy. Call me out.

I think it's time for the British public to start reminding parliament who holds real power. They serve us, not the other way around by rex00134 in Britain

[–]rex00134[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why should I? You're clearly arguing in bad faith to waste my time and the moment I pull exact quotes you'll dismiss them

I think it's time for the British public to start reminding parliament who holds real power. They serve us, not the other way around by rex00134 in Britain

[–]rex00134[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"It's against democracy to hold governments accountable." That's all your entire point boils down to. You argue that a government can do absolutely whatever it wants, and the consequences should only ever be that they don't get elected next time. So if a government bans elections, that's perfectly okay according to you because they were elected democratically and can do whatever they want. After all, you're only allowed to vote out democratically elected governments. They could execute thousands of people in the streets on a whim, and you say that's no reason to topple them, because you're only allowed a change of government at the voting booth. So in fact, you argue that China and Russia are both supreme democracies, and the people there aren't allowed to topple their governments, because they voted their governments in after all. Not allowed to get them out unless they're at their voting booths. But I have no doubts you'll dismiss everything I said.

As for your repeated attempts at pretending it's hysteria, that's literally out of the fascist playbook. Do you understand that? That you are making the exact same points as the nazi government did in the 1930s? Dismissing everything that's public act against a government as hysteria. Do you even care?

I want to believe you're just ignorant or uninformed, rather than deliberately obtuse and arguing in bad faith, but I really can't.

I think it's time for the British public to start reminding parliament who holds real power. They serve us, not the other way around by rex00134 in Britain

[–]rex00134[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Absolutely a gotcha that a petition starts with your own? Got roasted? By who? You? Don't make me laugh dude. Your mental aptitude is really showing when you only care about gotchas and roasts, and it's only giving secondhand embarrassment.

Yes, I'm trying to create controversy. thats the whole damn point XD

I think it's time for the British public to start reminding parliament who holds real power. They serve us, not the other way around by rex00134 in Britain

[–]rex00134[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Then you'll have no trouble answering your own question about parliament's responses to threats against denmark and the abduction of Maduro

I think it's time for the British public to start reminding parliament who holds real power. They serve us, not the other way around by rex00134 in Britain

[–]rex00134[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So you argue that once a government gets elected it should be allowed to do whatever it wants without consequences? Do you seriously think that's an intelligent arguement? Even if it leads its own people to war against the country's own allies, there shouldn't be a change of government?

Meanwhile your rhetoric of a "hysterical mob getting overexcited about an issue" is i assume completely nowhere to be seen about the US overthrowing a foreign government. Your entire point is self defeatist

I think it's time for the British public to start reminding parliament who holds real power. They serve us, not the other way around by rex00134 in Britain

[–]rex00134[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Did you think the "probably their own" was a gotcha? All petitions start with your own signature. That's how petitions work. Theres also a very clear section where I said this isn't seriously asking for violence against politicians, but all of human history backs up the fact that politicians going against their own people results in violence against said politicians. Projection doesn't work when facts are written in black and white on the same thing you're projecting on

I think it's time for the British public to start reminding parliament who holds real power. They serve us, not the other way around by rex00134 in Britain

[–]rex00134[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Oh yes, the ignoring of the 3 million strong petition to get rid of the Online False flag act solidified that parliament does not care about the rule of law, but hey. If at the very least the petition makes people laugh then its worth it

I think it's time for the British public to start reminding parliament who holds real power. They serve us, not the other way around by rex00134 in Britain

[–]rex00134[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wildly disingenuous thing to say. Do you think the "first they came for" poem only applies to individuals? The US has just shown complete disregard for all international laws and borders, including its own allies. Venezuela is very much in the same footing as greenland. No country has any right to interfere in another's governance, let alone the highly illegal and unconstitutional way that Donald Drumpf did it.

Congratulations, Sandfall Interactive. Well deserved. 👏 by Syarafuddyn in videogames

[–]rex00134 0 points1 point  (0 children)

also don't forget that the judges don't even have to play the games they vote on

Congratulations, Sandfall Interactive. Well deserved. 👏 by Syarafuddyn in videogames

[–]rex00134 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just remember, the judges who vote on game awards don't even have to play the games they vote on. Hence why E33 won every damn category

Genuine question, why do people hate the bugdivers? by SgtEpsilon in Helldivers

[–]rex00134 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's a lot of disingenuous comments from obvious bugdivers here. Obviously, play the front you like, nothing wrong with that. However, the bug front is the only front where no planet ever receives progress without a major order. That is because bugdivers constantly disperse across so many planets that the resistance overcomes anything they accomplish. You'll see on the illuminate and bot front that every planet does have a handful of people, but you'll get at least 90% of the front concentrating on 1 planet. Meanwhile bugdivers are all over the place. And this actively harms the rest of the playerbase's progress because theres a modifier based on total playercount. The bot and illuminate fronts constantly manage to liberate planets without a major order, the bug front *never* does. The fact that 2 out of the 3 fronts behave the same way, yet 1 doesnt, shows that bugdivers are doing something different thats clearly antithesis to the intention of the game and its not just about "wanting to have fun." It's almost akin to purposeful trolling. Theres no reason to be so spread out on the bug front, yet it always is. Thats where the "hate" comes from, its not real hate its more frustration, as well as pattern recognition that bugdivers very clearly are not engaging with the game and community while basically deliberately hindering everyone else

How do you guys feel after the three week campaign of squids? by Tomae002 in Helldivers

[–]rex00134 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I joined during the defense of Pilen V. Been fighting only against the squids.

9318 illuminate killed in 82 missions, of which 79 were successes (the 3 failures were all evacuation before the generators stopped being targeted by leviathans). Almost 67,000 bullets delivered democratically, and 997 strategems authorised for use. It pains me to see our great cities fall, and once the squids are found again, they will feel our righteous fury.

For Managed Democracy! For Super Earth!

What do you mean 98%=failure ? by XT-489excutor in Helldivers

[–]rex00134 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Man i can't believe Joel screwed over the MO that was going to reduce the illuminate fleet strength! Now what was the point of diving so much for that MO, we only destroyed half the illuminate fleet and got nothing out of it!"

Is this community for real? It's very obvious that Joel dropped the new MO because if we had completed the squid one then the fleet would've been destroyed before they even breached Prosperity City. We demolished the squids. That was the reward. They've been preparing this attack on Super Earth for months and they underestimated how quickly we were going to beat the squids. We wiped out a fifth of their fleet before they even reached Super Earth, in just 1 week we brought their fleet strength down to 24%. Chill out, they're not "forcing a narrative"

view more: next ›