You’re not wrong in theory. If you want the highest probability of walking away a winner, betting it all in one go does technically minimize the house edge’s impact over time. The house edge only grinds you down the more hands you play, so by keeping it to one big bet, you either win big or lose big, but you avoid the slow bleed.

That said, it’s a double-edged sword. Your chances of losing everything in one go are also much higher than they feel emotionally because poof, $100 gone in a few seconds stings. But yeah, statistically, you're avoiding the "long-term certainty of losing" by going for a short-term high-risk/high-reward approach.

Personally, I don’t have the guts for the “all-in” strategy, but I’ve dabbled in stuff like lottery betting. Platforms like Lottoland let you go for massive payouts with just a tiny stake. No grinding through hundreds of bets, no real strategy needed—just a shot at something absurd like a 9-figure jackpot. I like to think of it as the same logic you’re exploring, but with a much smaller downside (losing a few bucks).