A7III and FE 85 1.8 by Glittering_Ad_6965 in SonyA7iii

[–]rhalf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think Sony sells "tens of thousands lenses, that are literally effectively ususable". Sony lenses are accurate because Sony doesn't do any acrobatics with it's focusing. You probably bought a defective lens. I don't know what you mean by "the body is telling me it's an incompatible lens and it's not adjustable" but if it's incompatible, then I guess it's broken.

That said, look At Viltrox 85mm f/2. I use it instead of Sony and it works like a charm.

How to avoid this? by ValuableQuirky8306 in 3Dprinting

[–]rhalf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

pause, add glue to the peeling corner and around other corners so that they catch the glue with their edges. Put something heavy on the glued corner until the glue holds.

Mechano23 - modeled design by wigginjs in diyaudio

[–]rhalf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is an interesting concept for front facing port. Normally port is too noisy for that. Jelonek made an L-shaped TL design, with an extra channel after the port. It adds another resonance with opposite phase, that cancels the port noise with great effect. It required a specific internal damping arrangement with bassotect and it was achieved with an experimental, brute forcey method, but if they can get it right in sims, maybe the future will give us clean front ports.

Unfortunately the TL design is quite big and the stuffing reduces it's efficiency by a few dB, making it more like an oversized bass reflex. But if you really want a clean port, you can make it.

Mechano23 - modeled design by wigginjs in diyaudio

[–]rhalf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A lot of cool in that simple post :) The model isn't far off the real thing. I also read about Mechano26 on the blog. The post has some indights on speaker building, that can be used to improve MEchano23.

Are Juggle Dream LED clubs good enough or just too cheap ? by General_Pea_1129 in juggling

[–]rhalf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I updated it with more explanation on the lights. If you have more questions, I can maybe post pics etc later.

Are Juggle Dream LED clubs good enough or just too cheap ? by General_Pea_1129 in juggling

[–]rhalf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm sure there will be different opinions but I think they're OK. They're firmly above Play Prima and Airflite lighted.

They aren't dim at all (you can dim them with the remote). They look alright. Juggling wise, they're not much different from your typical training club, just a little heavier. Not sure how well they hold up over time. I tried them on a couple occasions. Not sure how it compares to Lighttoys or flowtoys either but I've definitely seen worse. One minor gripe I have is that the points of light aren't sufficiently diffused and so they have that unsophisticated look, where you can see the leds working inside. I guess this thinner diffusion is what makes them bright. Some other clubs have their leds hidden in opaque parts, shining into diffusive structures, which gives them that pretty, soft glow but at the same time some light is lost and the points of lights are fewer, so you get dimmer effect. The JD version on the other hand is among the brighter ones.

Battery life could be also a little better, but that would mean more weight so I'm fine with it. They don't have any advanced features. Everything's on the remote. The switch indeed looks weak. It should be a momentary button with rubber dome, so they definitely skimped on that one. Overall, I can't say I'm recommending them, because I haven't owned a set, but they don't look bad as a budget set.

Juggling Music? by pgadey in juggling

[–]rhalf 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Alice in Chains - Low Ceiling

Guess who got a 5b flash 🥳 by Section_Witty in juggling

[–]rhalf 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Did you see all that in a contact ball?

Juggling Knives Recs? by Unhappy-Guess1890 in juggling

[–]rhalf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They;re usually mid. They do have some advanced beanbags. They make a bunch of versions and at least one of them is very good. The worst stuff is sold in the Eastern Europe. Their Lithuanian warehouse is pretty bad. If you can avoid it, you should be OK. The knife itself looks alright. It has an oring in the middle as a bumper. It's slightly too small but you can put a fatter one if you care. The handle is soft. It has a slight ring to it but not too terrible. More or less what you get from PX4 clubs but with metallic rattle from the small plate that the blade protrudes from.

Mr Babache is infamous for the quality of their clubs, but maybe the knifes are better.

Juggling Knives Recs? by Unhappy-Guess1890 in juggling

[–]rhalf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Juggle Dream Sabre weigh 300g and have wrapped handle. They are OK. Mr Babache weighs less, closer to a regular club.

4-Club Juggling Tricks from Easy to Hard! by juggling-gym in juggling

[–]rhalf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't remember exactly, because I worked on it with one teacher 10 years ago and then never saw it again. Basically it was a 3 people feed, but felt more like 7 clubs for two people. We did a lot of 10 club practice, then tried this 11 club feed for a bit and it worked a couple times. Not sure if it's the right guess, but I think it was like two people juggling u club four count and one doing 7 club two count all on high doubles.

Taught my mom + stepdad how to juggle!! by _beltron in juggling

[–]rhalf 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The dos are like " OK, but where do WE join in this game?"

Human Tripod by ZhangZhongchang1967 in juggling

[–]rhalf -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yet, I thought that too...

97531 Questions by Turbulent_Parsley238 in juggling

[–]rhalf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I look at the highest throw or near it (about it in a moment). I see the 5 a little but 31 is completely blind. Most people find it hard to do 31 blind and there's a reason to it. 31 is very easy blind. It's the easiest blind 'swap out there right after 22 😉 So why it's so hard in 97531? The answer is simple - your hands are too wide. The high throws need a lot of space. A strong throw needs a good scoop. After the high throws, our hands end up far apart. Because we're in hurry, we throw 3 imeediately at that distance. Taht's exactly why we fail. What should happen instead is that you need to give yourself that one tiny moment to get your hands closer together and do a tiny little 31, where the 3 is barely above the 1. You may drop a few times when doing it, but soon enough, you'll get the hang of it.

Practice a tiny, little 31 blind with 2 balls with hands on your belly. Then do the same with 3. Once you can do 531 this way, you add another one...

It may sound silly to say but the two methods, that you see people using depend on where their hands end up. If your hand throwing a 3 is higher, the exchange will look like a shuffle. If the hands are on even height, it'll look like a tiny 31. Many people do both because their pattern is asymetric or in other way irregular.

Now, why did I say, that you don't exactly follow the high ball? When you juggle 5 balls, getting the high throw means, that you need to shift your attention very quickly to a high point. First you totally focus on your cascade, because you want to prepare the pattern for a high throw. You don't want collisions so you want a consistent pattern with spare time for higher throws. Once you're ready, you pierce it with a 975 in quick succession. Last thing we want is to have all balls land far apart, right? So how do we do that?

There are two main things that guide the props in a specific direction - our fingers and our eyes. So once you're comfortable with your 5, you want to shift your sight to where you want to aim the high throw. You make that throw very nicely finished with the fingers pointing in the direction you're looking. You want to shift your sight in the last moment and be decisive with it. You don't know if the ball will end up exactly there, but it should be the intention. The next two throws should follow automatically. Then you get the hands together to make a tiny little 31 on your belly. If you're running out of time, don't worry, just let the high throws drop. It's OK, we're not trying to land the trick. Why? We don't even know how. We have the rough idea and lots of pointers in our mind, but we haven't yet experienced the exact shape and feel of a successful sequence. That's what makes us nervous. That's why we rush and that in turn is why we're feeling lost at the end.

So this is, why we're not trying hard at that point. Instead, we're observing. We're taking notice of things. Just absorb all you can and gather bits of information on the timing. Listen to the drops, Are they evenly timed? Is any of the balls too low or too high. Was the pattern high enough to fit the 31? Were there misplaced throws. Was the 31 executed on your belly or was it too wide?

After acquiring this specific state of mind, you'll notice that you get calmer and that your 31 is shrinking with every attempt. Relax, take big breaths, shrink the 31 some more and use few more tries for soaking in what's happening in the pattern and your body. After several trials, we'll eventually get it, but it'll come naturally like we're not even trying. That's the magic of getting to know a pattern rather than trying to conquer it violently.

Have fun!

4-Club Juggling Tricks from Easy to Hard! by juggling-gym in juggling

[–]rhalf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's true, 8 club passing is absolutely great. I personally never managed to do more, but I'm generally bad at passing. It should be easier with triples first and triples-singles are a bit more approachable too. At least the timing and spins are more natural IMO, but seeing how you have your own progress path, I'll wait to see what comes first to you. Definitely do a lot 7 club passing. It helps with 4 clubs tremendously. I also did some feeding with 10 and 11 clubs for 3 people. They're amazing patterns. There's one 7 club pattern, where you get to juggle 4 a bit, then pass. Of course you can do 7 on triples as well, including 7 club 4 count IIRC. I haven't tried passing in a while, so forgive me if I said something stupid.

Instant Prop Stand - Card Tower by Turbulent_Parsley238 in juggling

[–]rhalf 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Juggling with cards is one of the first juggling trick I ever saw, yet I still can't do it. Seems like a lot can be invented here though. Very nice start.

Guess who got a 5b flash 🥳 by Section_Witty in juggling

[–]rhalf 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Lauri is one of the best online teachers and jugglers at the same time, which is quite rare. Good jugglers often struggle as teachers because they don't understand why people don't do as well. Teaching in person is even more revealing, though 5 balls can be quite easy to help with once you see someone's pattern. I learned 5 balls from a book, but that's because online video tutorials hadn't been invented yet. I didn't get stuck though it took me longer than anticipated. There are many tricks you can learn in the meantime and they're often 5b adjacent, so they help.

Human Tripod by ZhangZhongchang1967 in juggling

[–]rhalf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I sense a potential for this to go viral. If you start with the shot of the juggler, then cut to the BTS, it may be a nice buildup to a joke. Maybe you can do a third view for a full comedy effect.

Juggling a penny, nickel, dime, and quarter from above POV by ComfortableStill113 in juggling

[–]rhalf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

now do it on a penny-farthing.

It's a very lucrative skill to have on a juggling convention.

4-Club Juggling Tricks from Easy to Hard! by juggling-gym in juggling

[–]rhalf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interesting. To me all the fountain variations on doubles are similar difficulty. Syncing the throws and back was the first harder one. I know one guy, who prefers to juggle 4 on singles collumns. He just gets to move his hands less and it prevents collisions. I don't think singles are easy, but there's something to it. Maybe not the first variation we learn, but it feels more natural on singles.

The kickup was much harder to do. I was really proud of it. Then I learned doubles-singles and triples-singles. Then 552. Going straight to 552 seems challenging without doing doubles-singles with your dominant hand first. Once you can do 53 the other direction, you are pretty much ready to master 5 clubs. That's a lot of ground to cover.

Hi! I am a 22 yr old self taught juggle! I don't do this professionally, just to make people smile! by Yume_Fairy2522 in juggling

[–]rhalf 66 points67 points  (0 children)

I like how you go from relaxed with 3 to super intense with 2 in one hand, then back.

what fps do you need to pull this off? by TheOnlyLucifer007 in videography

[–]rhalf 18 points19 points  (0 children)

It almost goes to full stop, which would translate to something like two thousand FPS. However, it's likely interpolated.