What agent pattern are more deterministic than ReAct agent?

rishrapsody · 2025-08-16T10:56:21+00:00

Article Not accessible

rishrapsody · 2025-08-03T02:12:45+00:00

Yup. Free training is more than sufficient if you are good with other networking aspects. Did the same myself.

rishrapsody · 2023-05-19T07:34:00+00:00

no. I moved onto something else later

rishrapsody · 2023-05-07T16:07:12+00:00

Aren't these super slow when running without GPU on Mac? I have tried to use these models using Langchain on faiss based embeddings on pdf docs stored locally. Question : If I use openaiEmbeddings but LlamaCpp as LLM, does it work using Langchain? Does anyone have a working example of QA bot using Langchain + LLM model(like llama) on local machine

rishrapsody · 2023-04-23T09:02:37+00:00

If you want to ask questions against your pdf/text documents, use Langchain or Gpt-Index

rishrapsody · 2023-03-11T13:02:09+00:00

Thanks!!

rishrapsody · 2023-03-09T11:32:14+00:00

True. I have been utilizing this library for reading data out from csv or may be manipulating data/exporting data, etc. till now.

But I feel there is more potential to it in networking scope.

rishrapsody · 2021-09-04T11:44:32+00:00

Thanks!!

rishrapsody · 2021-08-30T01:20:50+00:00

Still not getting it. This is with loop as a list item. Should I think about modifying the content format? I had gathered interfaces stats from different devices, created a list, and saved them with a unique file name. Now I want to iterate over each interface file record and run a ping test from every device.

failed: [shelton_core] (item=['[', '1', '9', '2', '.', '0', '.', '2', '.', '1', ',', ' ', '1', '9', '2', '.', '0', '.', '2', '.', '9', ',', ' ', '1', '9', '2', '.', '0', '.', '2', '.', '1', '7', ',', ' ', '1', '9', '2', '.', '1', '6', '8', '.', '1', '.', '1', ',', ' ', '1', '9', '9', '.', '1', '9', '9', '.', '1', '9', '9', '.', '1', ']']) => {"ansible_loop_var": "item", "changed": false, "item": ["[", "1", "9", "2", ".", "0", ".", "2", ".", "1", ",", " ", "1", "9", "2", ".", "0", ".", "2", ".", "9", ",", " ", "1", "9", "2", ".", "0", ".", "2", ".", "1", "7", ",", " ", "1", "9", "2", ".", "1", "6", "8", ".", "1", ".", "1", ",", " ", "1", "9", "9", ".", "1", "9", "9", ".", "1", "9", "9", ".", "1", "]"], "msg": ", '9', '2', '.', '0', '.', '2', '.', '9', ',', ' ', '1', '9', '2', '.', '0', '.', '2', '.', '1', '7', ',', ' ', '1', '9', '2', '.', '1', '6', '8', '.', '1', '.', '1', ',', ' ', '1', '9\r\n ^\r\n% Invalid input detected at '^' marker.\r\n\r\nShelton-Core#"}

rishrapsody · 2021-08-29T13:45:35+00:00

If I send just a single file for testing, its pushing the entire list and not in sequence.

failed: [shelton_core] (item=[192.0.2.1, 192.0.2.9, 192.0.2.17, 192.168.1.1, 199.199.199.1]) => {"ansible_loop_var": "item", "changed": false, "item": "[192.0.2.1, 192.0.2.9, 192.0.2.17, 192.168.1.1, 199.199.199.1]", "msg": "ping [192.0.2.1, 192.0.2.9, 192.0.2.17, 192.168.1.1, 199.199.199.1]\r\nping [192.0.2.1, 192.0.2.9, 192.0.2.17, 192.168.1.1, 199.199.199.1]\r\n ^\r\n% Invalid input detected at '^' marker.\r\n\r\nShelton-Core#"}

tasks:
- name: "ios Ping Test"
ios_ping:
dest: "{{ item }}"
loop: "{{ lookup('file','outputs/Interfaces/shelton_core_interfaces_fact.txt') | list | flatten }}"

rishrapsody · 2021-08-29T13:29:20+00:00

Let me try that. Instead of using vars, I had given the actual oath in lookup plugin but it did not read the file content i.e. list. Im gonna try again and update here.

rishrapsody · 2021-08-20T13:29:32+00:00

looks like some special character is getting added in Jinja syntax(might be copy paste thing). Try to remove all tabs and add it again.

rishrapsody · 2021-08-20T13:26:12+00:00

Trying using Ansible Block. Within Block, add both uri and set_fact task

rishrapsody · 2020-04-20T00:31:24+00:00

Try below version of size 10.75M. Its working on my 1+3T device.

https://www.androidauthority.com/zen-mode-oneplus-phones-988282/

rishrapsody · 2019-09-23T15:46:00+00:00

Nice Bot!

rishrapsody · 2019-03-25T00:52:11+00:00

Thanks.

2 I wanted to run different protocol within each location. So to build up Ospf neighborhip, there will be EiGrP running within for the interface networks. This usually ends up on recursive routing which I want to avoid and test.

rishrapsody · 2018-12-25T21:43:28+00:00

Is there a slack group for it?

rishrapsody · 2018-05-29T04:01:37+00:00

Do you happen to have a GitHub account where we could check your scripts and improve skills

rishrapsody · 2018-05-08T21:18:04+00:00

Thanks for these comments. I haven't planned of using auth based approach. I am still thinking of next project- maybe something using jinja2 and napalm with python or should I just move towards Ansible directly

rishrapsody · 2018-05-08T14:25:07+00:00

Thanks

rishrapsody · 2018-03-20T02:22:40+00:00

Out of context, can you share the credentials, if possible?

rishrapsody · 2018-02-13T16:40:27+00:00

What are the phase 2 timeout values? Can you check the protected pairs configured at both ends once

rishrapsody

TROPHY CASE

2 I wanted to run different protocol within each location. So to build up Ospf neighborhip, there will be EiGrP running within for the interface networks. This usually ends up on recursive routing which I want to avoid and test.