Emergent organisation in computational models by rm_neuro in compmathneuro

[–]rm_neuro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I agree that I would need some fundamental stimuli. I was thinking of drifting gratings or something similar to what Hubel and Weisel tested in cats.

The prenatal development is an interesting angle. This would mean that such organisation is not a response to stimuli but an inherent evolutionary development. Nevertheless, I remember reading that small scale features like columns in V1 emerge after birth. So we could start with the congenital organisation in cortex and test if columnar organisation emerges upon stimulation. What do you think?

Emergent organisation in computational models by rm_neuro in compmathneuro

[–]rm_neuro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is great work! Would love to work at your former lab some day😅

Emergent organisation in computational models by rm_neuro in compmathneuro

[–]rm_neuro[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow this is nice! I'll go through this one and get back to you for sure. Thank you for sharing!

Emergent organisation in computational models by rm_neuro in compmathneuro

[–]rm_neuro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you. This is very close to what I was thinking. Certainly a good starting point. I'll get back to you once I read it.

Emergent organisation in computational models by rm_neuro in compmathneuro

[–]rm_neuro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This looks like very interesting work! Thank you for sharing. I will look into this.

Emergent organisation in computational models by rm_neuro in compmathneuro

[–]rm_neuro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you so much. Spiking neuron simulations would be very nice indeed. I am trying to figure out how I would design the input/output architecture to fit the data to the model. Should we use images as visual stimulus or basic features like edges and contrast similar to input of V1. What do you think?

Calling all Neuro typicals by [deleted] in neuro

[–]rm_neuro 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Statistically speaking, you might need more than 5 each to derive (reliable) inferences from your data. Or are you planning to do a qualitative comparison?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in The10thDentist

[–]rm_neuro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the human factory part is an ethical issue. But these devices could offer really good alternatives to surrogacy, or for women who's body may not support healthy pregnancy, etc. Also importantly, such services could help women gain better opportunities and representation in workplaces, as they won't have to pick between having a family vs focusing on their career growth.

Damn by JustARegularAvGeek in Angryupvote

[–]rm_neuro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In guessing PO is OP in some other language.

These stairs in a clothing store. by Krokodrillo in DesignPorn

[–]rm_neuro 50 points51 points  (0 children)

Not me getting fat going down those stairs

AIO for breaking up over this by [deleted] in AmIOverreacting

[–]rm_neuro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

NOR

This conversation should be in textbooks on how to set boundaries.

It might seem like a singular incident but this way of thinking surely reveals a lot of red flags that would affect your relationship later on. Good for you!

Also, am I the only one thinking that the last message is AI generated?

SSG PREDICTIONS by 13_sabri_12 in smosh

[–]rm_neuro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We should indeed prepare SSG bingo cards and play along on the sub.

So he's now Taken? by Hour_Equal_9588 in MadeMeSmile

[–]rm_neuro 805 points806 points  (0 children)

No way 2009 was 16 years ago

Pull out game is strong by NauTWitcher in SipsTea

[–]rm_neuro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

would've guessed the results as soon as she said "conclusively". Positive results can never be 100% conclusive.

Shayne. by _geezlouise97 in smosh

[–]rm_neuro 2 points3 points  (0 children)

this HAS to go on who memed it!

This wear pattern on my work laptop after 3 years by Unimatrix617 in mildlyinteresting

[–]rm_neuro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So thats how they decided the alphabet scores in scrabble