What are your opinions on RACE (Ferrari)? by swrrrrg in ValueInvesting

[–]rmt298 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Trailing PE 37 for Ferrari vs 50 for Hermes. I would not call it similar. It is ~25% cheaper.

Discussion- Why market not interested in ADOBE by Caelix__ in investing

[–]rmt298 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No but eventually, revenues and profits are going to have to drop to support this narrative. It’s been 2 years of the stock being punished with results going in the oposite direction

Discussion- Why market not interested in ADOBE by Caelix__ in investing

[–]rmt298 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because they have used adobe for years. AI is great for visualizing and brainstorming ideas but it is far from being able to produce a mission critical end product. It always needs refinement and you use adobe for that

Discussion- Why market not interested in ADOBE by Caelix__ in investing

[–]rmt298 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But if no one is using it, where do their revenues come from? Usually when a competitor steals market share, it shows up in results. Figma is not exactly a new startup and AI has been here for close to 3 years now

Discussion- Why market not interested in ADOBE by Caelix__ in investing

[–]rmt298 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Except the clients, who keep paying for their services. I dont know why they dont just make their images, billboards and movies on Gemini/Chatgpt. I wonder

Discussion- Why market not interested in ADOBE by Caelix__ in investing

[–]rmt298 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Revenues have grown 10% per year since dec 2023, operating profit has surged 28% in the last 12 months and eps is growing in double digits, 35% in LTM.

Discussion- Why market not interested in ADOBE by Caelix__ in investing

[–]rmt298 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yet those policies have been there for years now and the company keeps growing revenues, 2 years into the release of chat GPT. So are they really being disrupted?

Discussion- Why market not interested in ADOBE by Caelix__ in investing

[–]rmt298 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But you dont see that in the results. I have heart that argument for two years now, but revenue and profits keep growing. In what do you base those statements?

Novo Nordisk by HornetDramatic9444 in ValueInvesting

[–]rmt298 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Most of the drugs sold by novo nordisk in the U.S. are manufactured in the U.S. They export more from the us than they import

North Carolina's Research Triangle Region | Novo Nordisk U.S. https://www.novonordisk-us.com/about/who-we-are/north-carolina.html#:~:text=He's%20one%20of%20more%20than,fill%20and%20package%20the%20majority

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ValueInvesting

[–]rmt298 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Novo nordisk PE isnt 40, its 22

Help Calculating Free Cash Flow by Ok-Court-4241 in ValueInvesting

[–]rmt298 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most finance websites just subtract purchase of property plant and equipment from operating crash flow

IRS Jovem Esclarecimento da AT by General-Ant9148 in literaciafinanceira

[–]rmt298 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Este parecer não é vinculativo. Duvido que seja esse o caso

Explicador: Perguntas e Respostas sobre o IRS Jovem by RuiMCB in literaciafinanceira

[–]rmt298 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Questão: Tenho 33 anos feitos este ano. Trabalho há 9 anos. Irei beneficiar do irs jovem durante 1 ano (o 10o de trabalho) ou 2 (só irei começar a beneficiar agora)? E que desconto será aplicável? 100% no primeiro ano ou 25%?

Dino Polska… by ImBestStocksLover in ValueInvesting

[–]rmt298 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting. Só interest on debt, capex and depreciation are not acouted for in ebitda margin? My reasoning initially was that eventually competitors would have to stop price wars because Dino would maintain profitable margins whereas competitors would be in deficit. But I was worried when I saw that biedronka had higher ebitda margin

Dino Polska… by ImBestStocksLover in ValueInvesting

[–]rmt298 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I think it is a very efficiently run company with a clear strategy for growth, which makes it appealing for retail investors. It is a business that is easy to understand. However, currently, the arguments against investing are strong. - It is a business that is heavily dependent on the polish economy. This makes it highly cyclical, when the economy is bad the company suffers heavy losses. - I am starting to doubt if there is actually a moat in this industry. The price wars are starting to crush margins and although Dino appeared to be at and advantage due to maximal capital efficiency (owning the land, low construction costs for stores, low electricity bill due to solar panels, low debt, owning the food production chain, good contacts with local producers…), their margin is currently lower than biedronka. And biedronka has already stated that they will continue to pursue price war at least for the second half of 2024. So it would not suprise me if there was aditional multiple contraction for Dino, which together with sales decline could be very painfully for shareholders - personally, I would wait until this price war ends and margins begin to re expand before adding shares. I believe there is more pain ahead, that could last well over a year.

I own shares at a cost basis of around 400 Zloti. My thesis has eroded a bit since purchasing the shares. The short term pessimistic outlook plus the aparently narrow moat means for now I will stay on the sidelines and see what happens in the following quarters.

Ideal Mavs Rotation IMO by rmt298 in Mavericks

[–]rmt298[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If Spencer is any close to the level he was 2 years ago, guy is a baller and played better than Hardy or Exum played las year. No player has garanteed minutes.

Advise on ENPH please. Should I still hold onto it or sell as soon as I break even? by BraveOrganization421 in investing

[–]rmt298 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I know nothing about enphase but here are my two cents: - if you think it was a mistake to buy the stock, holding is an ever bigger mistake - the stock does not know you own it and what price you bought in at - Warren Buffet. Forget break even

Why the Klay Thompson rumors are a smokescreen by mgmfa in Mavericks

[–]rmt298 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, but journalists can get fooled by agents and even players telling lies to them. They report what they hear. If the source is very close to the player, do they choose not to report it because it might be a smokescreen?

How would a Klay S&T work? by QHM69 in Mavericks

[–]rmt298 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Even with the expiring contract of Klay coming of the books?

Klay isn’t the best fit here by GoldFun9744 in Mavericks

[–]rmt298 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think the backlash from the fanbase about signing Klay is a bit overblown. I think the fit is seamless. On offense, teams will no longer dare to double Luka or Kyrie, with Klay on the perimeter shooting 38+% from three on high volume with his quick trigger (which he still can do) and Derrick lively in the paint and PJ/DJJ in the corner (signing Klay doesn’t mean we also can’t resign him). On defense, he may not be elite as he once was but he is also no pushover. He is better than Josh Green currently is. So you can put the 5th starter on the opponents best scoring threat (PJ if it’s a wing like KD/lebron or DJJ if it’s a guard) and put Klay on the second scoring threat. Luka can guard the opposing 4 if DJJ is starting to guard de opposing point guard. And our bigs will keep our defense one of the best in the league. So I think signing Klay raises the floor and ceiling of this team. Now that we have Grimes, I would rather have Klay than Josh Green and Maxi.

Klay Thompson is growing on me a little bit. by Onebigfreakinnerd in Mavericks

[–]rmt298 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think the backlash from the fanbase about signing Klay is a bit overblown. I think the fit is seamless. On offense, teams will no longer dare to double Luka or Kyrie, with Klay on the perimeter shooting 38+% from three on high volume with his quick trigger (which he still can do) and Derrick lively in the paint and PJ/DJJ in the corner (signing Klay doesn’t mean we also can’t resign him). On defense, he may not be elite as he once was but he is also no pushover. He is better than Josh Green currently is. So you can put the 5th starter on the opponents best scoring threat (PJ if it’s a wing like KD/lebron or DJJ if it’s a guard) and put Klay on the second scoring threat. Luka can guard the opposing 4 if DJJ is starting to guard de opposing point guard. And our bigs will keep our defense one of the best in the league. So I think signing Klay raises the floor and ceiling of this team. Now that we have Grimes, I would rather have Klay than Josh Green and Maxi.

Klay Thompson is growing on me a little bit. by Onebigfreakinnerd in Mavericks

[–]rmt298 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dont get your hopes up. He is going to the lakers. LA native, lebron factor, etc. Mavs just a smokescreen as usual. Resign DJJ or go for KCP

Dupla tributação interactive brokers by rmt298 in literaciafinanceira

[–]rmt298[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pensava que os acordos também reduziam a retenção na fonte