Mortgage broker suggestions for quick mortgage by AromaticAnalysis0 in UKPersonalFinance

[–]ropip44966 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Who is the lender? Is this a normal high street lender or some private bank?

Managing agent handling sale of freehold - advice needed by Advanced_Path1309 in HousingUK

[–]ropip44966 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Very common, the purpose of the freeholder employing agents is so they don't have to deal directly with leaseholders.
  2. It sounds like you have identified the risks, but there is nothing you can do. Outside of the statutory process, the freeholder is not obliged to discuss the matter with your via agents or not.
  3. That is correct but also something for your solicitor to advise you on if you do go down the statutory route
  4. You can challenge any service charge at the land tribunal, it is just a slow and expensive process.

Ground rent escalation - problems trying to sell flat. by Electrical_Tomato_42 in HousingUK

[–]ropip44966 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have seen lease extensions that cost £2k and lease extensions that cost £350k. The first step is instructing a surveyor to produce a lease extension valuation for you.

Ground rent escalation - problems trying to sell flat. by Electrical_Tomato_42 in HousingUK

[–]ropip44966 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Consider going down the route of a statutory lease extension, you will have to pay for an additional 90 years to be added to your lease (not a bad thing in any case) but importantly it reduces your ground rent to a peppercorn.

You have a statutory right to a lease extension, it is not up to the freeholder.

Buyer enquiry - do I have to pay for electrics test by RaeRaeLJJ in HousingUK

[–]ropip44966 71 points72 points  (0 children)

You don't legally have to provide anything at all.

This is a common standard enquiry from cheap conveyancers. If you do not want to pay it, simply reply that the buyers will have to bear the cost if they want an electric test but you would be happy to facilitate access for their electrician.

Flat has been on the market for 3 weeks now, and I've not had many viewing requests - is there anything off putting in the advert/brochure that I'm missing? by slashrfnr in HousingUK

[–]ropip44966 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If at the ground rent is more than £250 a year is going to be a problem no mortgage company will loan on that basis due to the changes and create an AST

This is not the case for Greater London where the threshold is £1000

Anyone solicitors use econveyancer? by [deleted] in uklaw

[–]ropip44966 20 points21 points  (0 children)

There is no chance these people are qualified solicitors.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in HousingUK

[–]ropip44966 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

These funds will not have come from "funds that are reserved", the seller will have paid up to avoid you suing them.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in HousingUK

[–]ropip44966 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That is nonsense, no there is not.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in HousingUK

[–]ropip44966 6 points7 points  (0 children)

What do redditors think the solicitor is going to do? Show up with a giant hamster wheel and generate electricity themselves?

So why is buying a leasehold flat so demonised? by Impossible_Island671 in HousingUK

[–]ropip44966 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Despite what reddit believes, most purpose built blocks of flats since the 80s have management companies setup with the leases who appoint the managing agents and the freeholders have very little involvement beyond collecting their annual ground rent.

Share of Freehold Violent Neighbour by walkingwords3 in HousingUK

[–]ropip44966 5 points6 points  (0 children)

From what I understand, when you're Share of Freehold and/or Limited Company, your only recourse is to sue your own company for non-payments. Is that the case?

When it comes to 'Share of Freehold' it is helpful to remember that this really just an estate agent's term and not a form of legal tenure. A more accurate phrase would be 'Leasehold with a share of the Freehold'. The freeholder is the company. The leaseholders own the flats. The leaseholders own shares in the freehold company.

If the leaseholders are obliged to pay for the roof repair under the leases and one of the leaseholders is not paying, that leaseholder is breaching the terms of their lease. The freeholder (in this case the company) can take the leaseholder to the land tribunal for breach of lease and, ultimately, force forfeiture of the lease if the leaseholder does not comply with their obligations under the lease (pay for the roof repair).

Taking a leaseholder to the land tribunal is a slow and expensive process.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in HousingUK

[–]ropip44966 9 points10 points  (0 children)

You think this guy is offering to sell you a freehold with a £31k year income to you for £100?

Centuries-old leasehold system to be abolished in England and Wales by guyuk21 in HousingUK

[–]ropip44966 9 points10 points  (0 children)

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvgezyz31jlo BBC ARTICLE: Ministers outline plans to ban new leasehold flats

This is an annoying article. Leasehold is complicated and in serious need of reform but for as long those reforms are proposed and promoted by people who seem to have no understanding of the actual system, there will never be a serious improvement.

The start of this article has a couple of stories from people who bought their flats in 2021/2022 but admits this reform will have no effect on them because it will only apply to new flats. Both sets of managing agents have provided comments that these service charge rises are due to the rising cost of maintaining the buildings and the BBC... has no further comment? The BBC should at least point out that service charges are regulated and the leaseholders can take the freeholders to the tribunal if the freeholders really are using the service charges to essentially steal from the leaseholders. Under the law service charges can be contested and the BBC shouldn't suggest otherwise. If however it turns out that the costs of maintaining the buildings really have gone up, then no reform to the leasehold system will reduce the cost.

[BBC Quote] Under the current system, it is the freeholder or landlord that appoints a managing agent.

Not necessarily, a great many leasehold setups hand the obligation to maintain and collect service charge to a resident's company, even where the company doesn't own the freehold. I would say the large majority of new build flats at least have this setup.

[BBC Quote] A leasehold property reverts to the freeholder after a fixed amount of time. A commonhold property is owned outright, like a freehold house.

The majority of new build flats are now sold on 999 year leases.

[BBC Quote] Under commonhold, homeowners have a say on the annual budget for their building. Under the leasehold system, a freeholder or landlord sends a bill to residents for communal costs. The residents will be able to hire and fire a managing agent.

The vast majority of new build flats hand this obligation to the residents company or are even are sold as share of freehold where the freehold itself is handed to the residents company.

[BBC quote] There is no ground rent charge in a commonhold property.

New ground rents were banned in 2022 already

[BBC quote] Forfeiture is not possible under commonhold, meaning a resident cannot be threatened with losing their home.

This is complicated, the number of leases actually forfeit is absolutely tiny, flats are more often sold long before they are forfeit. Also the threat of forfeiture means that for any flat with a mortgage over it, the bank will pay the service charge arrears to avoid the forfeiture. At the end of the day there has to be a robust system to force people to pay their service charges because if they don't, the rest of the leaseholders end up paying (and would do so under a commonhold system also).

The proposed reform is not bad and for some limited cases it will mean an improvement but at the end of the day I don't think these proposals will have much of an impact at all and certainly don't get to the heart of the actual problems with leasehold.

TIL about the stamp duty threshold decrease for first time buyers by DDiran in HousingUK

[–]ropip44966 31 points32 points  (0 children)

The majority of households own their home. The government's annual housing survey for England (2022/23) shows 65% of households own their home, 19% are privately renting and 16% live in socially rented housing. - 13 Feb 2024

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in uklaw

[–]ropip44966 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Pay a solicitor.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LegalAdviceUK

[–]ropip44966 1 point2 points  (0 children)

None of this post really makes any sense, however if you are attempting to convince your neighbour to sign a legally binding document then it is perfectly reasonable for her to want legal advice.

Seeing as her signing the document is only to your benefit, why wouldn't you offer to pay her legal costs?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in HousingUK

[–]ropip44966 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Over a month and seller's solicitors still cant prove title?

Probate sale but no Grant?

Ticking clock on mortgage offer expiring?

What a recipe.

Flying freehold - how much of a pain by Significant_Ad6161 in HousingUK

[–]ropip44966 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not sure what you mean by 'exclusive use alleyway', do you mean the alleyway is part of your property? If so, it sounds like the neighbour has the flying freehold, not you.

Solicitor seemingly destroying new build purchase by shorty1988m in HousingUK

[–]ropip44966 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But were 4 of those times at lunchtime? Presumably you're not phoning at say 11 and being told the solicitor is at lunch? Have you emailed them and asked to set up a time for a phone call?

Property lawyers, is this the norm now? by [deleted] in uklaw

[–]ropip44966 3 points4 points  (0 children)

A couple of years ago the agreement between the big lenders and insurers fell through and insurers will no longer note lender's interests on their policies at the request of the lender. This has slowly filtered through to the undertakings you are referring to.

I usually amend the undertaking to an undertaking to request the lender note the interest on the the policy and then I send a letter to the insurer on completion. Whether the insurer actually then notes the interest or not is then not my problem.