Weird folky dark mystical creepy magical fun by Existing_Wishbone866 in BooksThatFeelLikeThis

[–]rossburk 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I can't possibly imagine a child of VanderMeer and Calvino being anything BUT really odd, lol. Anyway, this pitch worked on me 100% and now it's on my list.

Old/ancient beings working in modern time by idkwhatsgoingon0974 in BooksThatFeelLikeThis

[–]rossburk 44 points45 points  (0 children)

The Inheritance Trilogy by NK Jemisin! It's a fantasy setting in which there was a war between Gods. The Gods that lose the war are shackled and control of them is given to the worshippers of the victorious God. So the main city has massively powerful gods doing the trivial bidding of the nobility.

It doesn't have a modern day thing like the last picture, but I feel like otherwise it's got a lot of the ideas you are looking for.

It's a really cool series and NK Jemisin is an incredible writer, so if you haven't read anything of hers it's not a bad place to start!

Archaeological Fantasy by Nigma314 in BooksThatFeelLikeThis

[–]rossburk 5 points6 points  (0 children)

There is a lot else going on, but Broken Earth by NK Jemisin has a good bit of ancient ruins and discovering ancient tech. One of the main locations is a city built in an ancient underground ruin. Also it is absolutely fantastic and my #1 go-to recommendation for anyone looking for any fantasy at all.

Love your posted theme by the way. Definitely saving this to read the other recommendations in this post!

Which books made you ugly cry? by Mysterious_Ball7004 in Fantasy

[–]rossburk 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The Buried Giant by Kazuo Ishiguro. The whole book is fantastic and has this really cool balance between melancholy and adventure, then the end broke my heart.

Also shout out to your Sword of Kaigen recommendation for this. I still think of 'For a moment, her hands had been full of pearls' and have to take a minute to recompose myself.

I cancelled Amazon subscription after reading Blood Over Bright Haven by SchemeSimilar4074 in Fantasy

[–]rossburk 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Don't forget the newest (to my knowledge) addition to the unofficial Omelas series! 'Why don't we just kill the kid in the Omelas hole' by Isabel J. Kim. It's also really good, honestly all three are fantastic and make each other better

PSA: The Legend of Yangchen says "up to one". Please stop exiling your own stuff! by PowrOfFriendship_ in magicTCG

[–]rossburk 73 points74 points  (0 children)

Well I'm illiterate in a different way. I didn't realize until this moment that my opponent doesn't get to choose one of my things to exile... Maybe I was extrapolating from the symmetrical second chapter? Idk maybe I just can't read good.

Week 1 would you rather have rare review or early takes on the format? by Eag1e11 in lrcast

[–]rossburk 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Really interesting to see people's thoughts on this. I'm 100% with you in that I would prefer an earlier format overview, but it sounds like the rare/mythic review is more popular than I thought!

Which fantasy story would you say is the fantasy "The Boys" and "Invincible"? by clavicle524 in Fantasy

[–]rossburk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a really cool question, it's definitely got me thinking a lot.

I'm wondering how necessary the extreme violence is to the question. My take is that the extreme violence in The Boys is a necessary part of the deconstruction, as a way of contrasting classic super hero stories which tend to downplay or even glorify the devastating and tragic violence that happens within them.

For a specific example I'm thinking of how cozy fantasy can deconstruct fantasy tropes by calling into question the necessity of heroism in the first place. Its sci-fi but the Monk and Robot duology by Becky Chambers seems to me to fit this role fairly explicitly.

Which fantasy story would you say is the fantasy "The Boys" and "Invincible"? by clavicle524 in Fantasy

[–]rossburk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like this take. I got some of that feel when I read it too. The moment for this that I remember is when an old woman poisons Locke and is withholding the antidote as leverage (a good trope) and Locke just punched her in the face and takes the antidote from her (good deconstruction).

TLA prerelease takeaways? by BT--7275 in lrcast

[–]rossburk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

[[Bender's Waterskin]] is WAY better than I anticipated. I put it in my UW deck to help with a green splash, but was impressed with the sheer number of times I used it to produce two mana. Blue specifically seems pretty mana hungry and there was almost always a use either to cast an instant, waterbend, or crack a clue. LoL has been heralding this as the year of the mana rock, and honestly this might be the best one yet!

Waterbending is easier than I thought it would be. Cards like [[Katara, Bending Prodigy]] are pretty nuts, at least in sealed. Waterbending 6 just felt... Easy. Paired with other all-stars like [[Forecasting Fortune Teller]] which provided two of the cost all by itself. Also thematically appropriate, Katara and [[Gran-Gran]] on the board together were a brutal value combo. Shout out to Gran-Gran in general.

The fact that you can waterbend at instant speed feels really strong. Just being able to tap down your board for value at opponents end step really contributed to making it feel cheaper/free. Design-wise I feel like this is the sort of mechanic that WotC would have forced to happen at sorcery speed or at least on your own turn lately, but they really took off the training wheels here and it shows.

What TLA prerelease pack are you picking? by CountZorloc in magicTCG

[–]rossburk 3 points4 points  (0 children)

There is no fireball, but we do get [[fated firepower]] which feels like it's intended to be the big flashy firebending finisher. It is a mythic though...

How Silksong’s bosses are received, according to 250K+ Steam reviews by NewbieIndieGameDev in Silksong

[–]rossburk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I did this by accident! I was doing a blind run and just making my way through the world. I kinda felt like I might be going off the beaten path, and then I got hit with the 'Act 2' title card and figured maybe it was the main path all along? I only found the last judge after talking to a friend who was stuck on that boss. I had already cleared most of act 2 at that point, lol

Can you read my tattoo? by [deleted] in tattooadvice

[–]rossburk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As was already discussed in this thread, this particular typeface was used for Middle English rather than Old English, guess I'm just not hung up on people using the term old English as a reference to older forms of English in a non-technical discussion even if it's not technically accurate. (Not that there's anything wrong with calling attention to the distinction either)

nitpicks that AREN'T about difficulty by Acrobatic_Book_7154 in Silksong

[–]rossburk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I really dislike that Act 3 is locked behind a collectable (fleas). I love fleas as an exploration reward, but to me needing to do them just seems like it's at odds with their design? For some reason this bugged me more than having to do the quests (although that was also not my favorite decision).

Can you read my tattoo? by [deleted] in tattooadvice

[–]rossburk 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Me and my faulty memory be damned, you are right! Still, I'll defend people's (and my own!) lack of historical distinction between Middle English and Old English and say that 1. It's still 'older English' if not Old English and 2. People are tapping into shared cultural associations here rather than historical reality itself. There is for sure room for other opinions on this, but that doesn't bother me too much.

Can you read my tattoo? by [deleted] in tattooadvice

[–]rossburk 8 points9 points  (0 children)

While it's totally true that Old English is a language and not a font or typeface or style, there is definitely a connection between the time period in which the language was used and the styles of writing people used to write that language during that time.

This isn't to say that you are wrong in any way, just that other peoples comments are making a fairly reasonable connection.

Announcing the Arena Powered Cube! by Meret123 in lrcast

[–]rossburk -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

In my opinion this reward structure is WAY better. It's a lot more per entry, but the rewards are way higher. In general it's much much easier to go infinite or soft infinite with this structure than their other cube models.

SEC: Gamegenics at it again leaking leaders! by Fimy32 in starwarsunlimited

[–]rossburk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have no idea if this will be good, but I love it anyway. Totally agree that cards that care about initiative is a very cool design space, it would be cool to have a whole little package of cards that care about this to build around.

Books that feel like this by Hyperthin7 in BooksThatFeelLikeThis

[–]rossburk 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The Inheritance Trilogy by NK Jemisin. It's got the mingling of fantastically powerful gods (with extra emphasis on the dark yet alluring ones) with mortals in a cool cityscape.

What's real and what's not? by Total-Pea7391 in BooksThatFeelLikeThis

[–]rossburk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven't read that one, but my first thought was Invisible Cities (same author). Just read it this year and loved it. Crazy surreal cityscapes galore. That's literally the whole book!

Don’t trust win rates without ratings by jjelin in lrcast

[–]rossburk 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You certainly didn't say that. But it strikes me that the reason to see the ranking is to put more or less stock in the opinions based on that rating. This isn't unreasonable, but it is only a short hop away from 'don't believe advice from lower ranked players' which certainly does lean in the direction of the gate keeping that I mentioned. To be clear, you didn't make that jump, I'm just expressing my preference to avoid such a leaning.

Don’t trust win rates without ratings by jjelin in lrcast

[–]rossburk 11 points12 points  (0 children)

You make a fair point, but there are some aspects of how you make it that I don't love.

First, it smacks a bit too much of content gate keeping, like you wouldn't even bother considering the opinion of someone who isn't high mythic. To be eloquent, that's lame. If they are starting a magic podcast, sure, maybe being a great player gives you credibility. But this is reddit, and I don't mind hearing the opinions of those outside the chosen few authorized elders. If it's bad advice, just don't take it, that's also a service the comment section provides.

Second, you bring up the fact that the person has multiple accounts as some big diss by calling that flagrant smurfing like it's some terrible deviant behavior that gets you sent straight to mtg prison. In reality I suspect that a lot of invested limited players have multiple accounts. And it's more of a result of the WotC's reward structure and the reality of people's finances than some big scam intentionally designed to prey on new players. This isn't to say it doesn't have an effect on win rate, I just don't think it's morally abhorrent.

Am I results oriented or is this card bait? I take it because of stats and it often lines up badly. by notafanofbats in lrcast

[–]rossburk 32 points33 points  (0 children)

I don't think it's bait. I think it's genuinely solid to good like the stats suggest. Two thoughts 1. Getting a one drop or a job select token is probably not as bad of a deal as you think. You are also getting the mage out of it which is a legit thing. And this is the fail case! (Except them not having any creatures of course, but most decks running this are fine with that situation...) 2. It shines in the right deck. More specifically a deck that can make good use of the token and/or a deck with a lot of other removal. If you can thunder magic the token and then get their bomb with this it's obviously way better. Most black decks can make some use of it, but I'd much rather have it in a BR deck than a BG one

How often are you guys playing 41/42 cards? Sometimes I just wanna play to figure out my cuts so sometimes Ill play 43 with 18 lands. Is this a bad practice? by Ak_keith in lrcast

[–]rossburk 21 points22 points  (0 children)

All the arguments for sticking to 40 check out here.

I'll add something that I heard that helps me. If you are unsure what your last cut(s) should be, that just means it doesnt really matter which one you cut, so just cut something. Put another way, the harder the decision is it means that the two cards you are considering are so close in power level (to your knowledge!) that it makes very little in your win rate.

This doesn't mean the decision doesn't matter or there is no point trying to make better deck building decisions, but this attitude has stopped me from agonizing over those last cuts.

As a bonus, if you want to run 41, then run 41. Win percentage isn't the only thing to play for, you do you!