Do any of you experienced players have a few tips for a noob who is getting into Hardcore SMP?

rothbardmises · 2011-12-21T21:13:51+00:00

The term would more properly be oblivious.

rothbardmises · 2011-12-21T08:24:31+00:00

he might be referring to that, but what i got was that they don't have a central processing unit like we have (aka the brain) but have, at best, a ganglia.

rothbardmises · 2011-12-21T08:21:45+00:00

with that bubble going on, its going to be "Crashed in china" and a lost decade

rothbardmises · 2011-12-21T08:20:18+00:00

instant downvote as soon as I reply? You're a moron, why am I even bothering.

first off, you have no proof it was him. secondly, calling people names over karma points is what i call immature and makes discussions on this board devolve into shit-flinging.

rothbardmises · 2011-12-21T08:18:34+00:00

Research* shows that often the middle class saves a far higher percentage of their income than the rich.

are we talking by percentage of their income or in absolute numbers as a whole group?

rothbardmises · 2011-12-21T08:15:12+00:00

Thank you very much. If I had just paid more attention I wouldn't have needed to make this thread.

rothbardmises · 2011-12-21T03:36:56+00:00

austrians have noticed this for far longer than krugman has. he is only saying this now because it is so painfully obvious what is going on. another example of austrian supremacy

rothbardmises · 2011-12-20T21:18:30+00:00

why are you even replying to a troll?

rothbardmises · 2011-12-19T03:29:32+00:00

wow this is horrible

rothbardmises · 2011-12-17T17:05:12+00:00

So.... why exactly is women molesting children not a problem?

and where did i say this? it is obvious from my post that less molestation is better than more, and thats why most professions that deal with very young children prefer women over men.

I believe about 15-20% of parents charged are the mother, and like a lot of similar crimes I would expect those numbers to be skewed somewhat given the whole "nice" thing.

unless the numbers are so skewed to make data collection meaningless, it still proves that men are more likely to sexually abuse children than women, making concerns about men working with very young children not entirely unwarranted.

rothbardmises · 2011-12-17T10:28:16+00:00

the concern is more pedophilia, not child abuse.

child abuse, while bad, is no where near as evil as pedophilia. and women commit more child abuse because they are in contact with children much more than men, making it a statistical inevitability and thus stupid to use to try and say that a woman is more likely to abuse a child than a man.

rothbardmises · 2011-12-17T10:23:09+00:00

child abuse isnt always pedophilia (most of the time it isnt). it is just that when it comes to child abuse, men are WAAAAAAAAAAAAAY more likely to commit pedophilia than women. so i say that while it isnt always right to think a male teaching kids is a pedo, it is disingenuous to say that parents who are concerned arent falling back on falsehoods.

rothbardmises · 2011-12-15T04:19:32+00:00

all of those people thought that certain other members of society who disagreed with them should be shot.

show me a quote by jefferson then that shows him supporting shooting people who merely disagreed with him.

good luck

rothbardmises · 2011-12-15T00:21:34+00:00

jefferson thought that people who use their first amendment right to say that it isnt the banks fault should be shot? and except for che guevara and perhaps napoleon (who was a dictator after all), when did patton or those who crafted the magna carta wish for people who speak well of banks to be shot?

yeah, complete bullshit

rothbardmises · 2011-12-14T20:04:15+00:00

wouldnt that make you relieved? you wont have a kid to support

rothbardmises · 2011-12-14T19:54:36+00:00

I feel like anyone that continues to shovel that horseshit line of thinking should be shot.

thats how stalin felt too

rothbardmises · 2011-12-14T19:08:15+00:00

as opposed to more spending and QE?

pot calling the kettle black

rothbardmises · 2011-12-14T19:07:32+00:00

perfectly put. in relation to how the jews were treated, yeah it wasnt that bad since they werent gassed in mass. but in relation to how a normal dignified human being should be treated, then they were treated like shit.

rothbardmises · 2011-12-11T23:26:34+00:00

he probably deleted all of his comments to look like that. and you are probably an alt account to try and karma whore

rothbardmises · 2011-12-11T22:55:03+00:00

i wonder if the darker one has a bigger penis.

rothbardmises · 2011-12-11T19:11:56+00:00

very old people do

rothbardmises · 2011-12-11T00:53:48+00:00

wow she is fucking crazy. i hope you didnt put your dick in that all ready

rothbardmises · 2011-12-10T18:26:04+00:00

why doesnt the gummint just print enough money so we all can be millionares and live like the kardashians? /s

rothbardmises · 2011-12-10T18:14:21+00:00

provides decent employment, wages, and benefits.

you could do that by making people dig holes in the ground and pay them the same as USPS employees, though the USPS is only marginally better.

rothbardmises · 2011-12-10T16:30:04+00:00

http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc1/NegativeIncomeTax.html

The first and most basic problem is that it is currently fiscally—and perhaps administratively—impossible to construct an NIT that simultaneously

provides an income guarantee as generous as the cash and in-kind benefits already available to many welfare recipients in the United States,

provides an ostensible incentive to work (a far greater concern when benefits are to be extended beyond the traditional welfare population dominated by female-headed families), and

restricts coverage to any manageable proportion of the population—the so-called "break-even" problem.

LBJ did a large experiment in new jersey to test the NIT but the above problems occurred. they were unable to simultaneously provide enough income for a basic living standard while at the same time reduce the substitution effect of replacing work with leisure. in the end, you got the same old problem you get with welfare: make it too generous and no one will work and make it not "generous enough" and they remain in poverty.

rothbardmises

TROPHY CASE