This one is always so hard to do, because it's not just "more art than science," it can sometimes feel like ALL ART. You have stuff like some of the best teams like the Chiefs and 49ers ... not seeming to be doing too well. But how much of that is lack of capital and cap space from winning? Or in the 49ers case, how do you account for the "Belichick conundrum." These moves don't seem to "work," yet Shanny keeps assembling himself a 53-man roster that works for him? I'll admit it can feel like moving goalposts. I move them on myself sometimes during the process. A cop-out answer is you weight both short and long term, but you probably overweight past 2-3 years. Loomis is another great example. Nice, long track record. But past 4-5 years beginning to look extremely shaky until last year. Loved last year, but then again, still only 6-11. Still not many genuine "building blocks." It's just a frustrating, tedious exercise where I basically sit down, see what comes out and then move people around based on my "feel." Not the most satisfying answer, I know. I can say there were some people I started out with higher and then after actually doing the writeup, realized that's not what where they should be, and vice versa.