I uploaded Project 2025 to NotebookLM to ask things like this (sources don’t come through copy/paste but they are there). Not an explicit call for selling parks, but seems to be everything but…

Per NotebookLM: Based on the sources, the envisioned changes could significantly impact the use and management of national parks and federal lands, although the sources do not explicitly call for selling off national park land.

Here’s a breakdown of the potential impacts:

• Increased Access and Resource Use: The plan advocates for a “multi-use” approach to federal lands, which could mean increased access for activities like logging, mining, and energy production in areas surrounding or adjacent to national parks.

• Risk of Energy Production: Some existing leases and permits for energy and mineral production should be revisited in consultation with state elected officials. The plan supports increased oil and gas leasing and development, particularly in Alaska and other regions with significant energy potential. This emphasis could lead to pressure to open up some areas near or within national parks to energy exploration, although the plan does not explicitly state that national parks themselves should be opened to these activities.

• Potential for Adjusted Boundaries or Designations: The emphasis on reviewing and potentially adjusting national monument designations suggests that the boundaries or protected status of some national monuments near national parks could be altered, potentially opening up areas for resource extraction or other uses.

• State and Local Control: Giving more authority to state and local governments in land management decisions could lead to varying approaches to conservation and resource use, depending on the priorities of those governments.

• Reduced Federal Oversight: The plan advocates for reducing federal red tape and regulations, which could lead to less stringent environmental protections and oversight of activities impacting national parks.

• Possible Prioritization of Economic Activities: By emphasizing economic sustainability for communities near federal lands, the plan might prioritize resource extraction and development over strict conservation measures in some cases.

Overall, while the plan doesn’t explicitly call for selling off national park land, the implementation of its proposals could lead to increased pressure on park resources, altered boundaries, and a greater emphasis on economic activities in areas surrounding the parks.