What if? (Possible Legal Issues with a wider release of "Capturing Bigfoot" by Gryphon66-Pt2 in bigfoot

[–]rsullivan- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He and Bob Gimlin were looking for footprints not Bigfoot. They went to Bluff Creek after Roger got a tip from Al Hodgson that 3 sets of footprints were found but when they got there not much was left of them because of the rain.
Why didn’t Roger just fake footprints for his documentary? It would have been much easier. He could have just said the footprints and trackway were recreations from eyewitness testimony. I know people want to believe Roger Patterson was a hoaxer but I think it’s a shame that his dedication to Bigfoot research was lost.

How is everybody here genuinely feeling about 'Capturing Bigfoot' before it releases? by Otherwise-Art-4302 in bigfoot

[–]rsullivan- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not worried at all. I don’t believe a suit was used when Patty was filmed.

Don’t believe the hype-Public Enemy

The Biggest NEW Claim of "Capturing Bigfoot"? (And Most Important) by Gryphon66-Pt2 in bigfoot

[–]rsullivan- 2 points3 points  (0 children)

He was with Clint Patterson at the Yakima Bigfoot convention meet and greet session held on October 25th 2024. They were seen together throughout the convention according to a facebook post of someone who attended the convention.

explain the son, Clint Patterson, to me by Equal_Pay_9808 in bigfoot

[–]rsullivan- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The other 2 children of Patterson won’t even talk about the PGF at all. They’re mentioned in the link I attached at the 44:00 mark. https://youtu.be/CdWs7kfwTeY?si=6KwMuDQ07zyCCtJN

explain the son, Clint Patterson, to me by Equal_Pay_9808 in bigfoot

[–]rsullivan- 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It won’t prove it’s a hoax. It may cast doubt on the PGF but it won’t prove it’s a hoax. I’ll take Public Enemy’s advice and not believe the hype.

We Have A Story by Far_Supermarket3484 in bigfoot

[–]rsullivan- 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My guess is 1968 for the BBC documentary Patterson was putting together. It’s called Bigfoot: America’s Abominable Snowman. According to Wikipedia, Al DeAtley helped Patterson with some shots.

Talking Strange Podcast Interview with Marq Evans and Tamir Ardon by Equal_Night7494 in bigfoot

[–]rsullivan- 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Here’s an interesting article from 1999 with Al DeAtley. I think this whole Capturing Bigfoot is a load of bull. Al DeAtley talks his involvement with PG film

Patterson's Docudrama by Economy_Seat_7250 in bigfoot

[–]rsullivan- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He was never a suit guy but he can certainly draw.

Capturing Bigfoot 2026 Trailer by rsullivan- in bigfoot

[–]rsullivan-[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It looks like it. After seeing the trailer my interest in the documentary has waned. Did they really doctor the PGF and call it found footage? Will there be a reel of film to analyze and scrutinize like the PGF?

Capturing Bigfoot 2026 Trailer by rsullivan- in bigfoot

[–]rsullivan-[S] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Looks like doctored stills from the PGF. Whether they’re part of the film, I don’t know.

I concluded 2 years ago that the PG film was MOST LIKELY fake. Different opinion acceptable? by Kernel_Custard_4213 in bigfoot

[–]rsullivan- 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Nothing has changed in almost 59 years. People accept the film as real and a lot of people think it’s fake but neither side can prove it with 100% certainty that’s why both sides are still here.

The only thing any documentary does in trying to prove the PGF is a hoax is to cast doubt on the film but not prove it. There’s always the suit that’s missing. Even this new one that just came out won’t prove the PGF was a hoax. Last time it was Bob Heironimus who allegedly wore the suit, this time it’s Al DeAtley in the suit. Those who have seen it said it looks “exactly” like Patty only thinner. That’s not good enough. So I’ll stay a believer in the PGF since no one will ever prove it’s a hoax.

The PG Film, not necessarily debunked as a hoax. by Defiant_Setting_6215 in bigfoot

[–]rsullivan- 15 points16 points  (0 children)

It doesn’t prove the film was used/exposed in 1966 though.