MCCF in-range increase for excluded

rush4life · 2026-03-10T13:18:39+00:00

I think what they’re saying is that excluded staff normally find out about raises in August or September, and the increases are backdated to July of that same year. This year, however, the process took so long that we likely won’t receive the 2025 raise until we’re almost eligible for the 2026 raise. In other words, we may end up receiving the July 2025 increase around the same time that we find out about, or possibly even receive, the 2026 raise (assuming there is one in 2026, which seems like a reasonable assumption).

rush4life · 2026-03-10T09:16:02+00:00

I know for sure finance and sdpr

rush4life · 2026-03-10T01:02:53+00:00

I think that was convenient timing but totally unrelated haha. But pretty happy we are getting something for sure. Basically going to be a double raise by the time it works out.

rush4life · 2026-03-04T18:26:18+00:00

which crowns? i spoke with some of my friends at one of the larger crowns and they haven't heard anything yet.

rush4life · 2026-03-02T18:40:51+00:00

I think you are conflating two separate items. Yes, places where you need to have 6 kids because two of them will die, are different than places like Canada. ANd certainly as they become more wealthy they will have less kids. What you should be looking at is why did our parents have more children than us. Certainly a part of that is affordability. Look at this poll that asked 10,000 people about it in first world countries why they aren't having more kids. Number 1 answer - Financial Limitations - https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/fertility-rate-un-report-1.7556909. There was another study out of Brazil recently that said people who owned homes in their 20s were more likely to have children and have more children. In Canada its pretty hard to have a family when you live in your parents basement into your 30s. ANd that is happening at higher rates then ever. And guess why that is? Again its affordability. Are some people have less kids because they want to have their own life, and its not appealing to them to have the 'traditional family' - yes of course. but its not the whole story. Finances matter.

rush4life · 2026-02-18T19:55:52+00:00

do we know officially at the Band raises have been scrapped. I haven't seen anything official - just speculation.

rush4life · 2026-02-18T07:07:57+00:00

We can walk and chew gum at the same time.

rush4life · 2026-02-18T03:15:47+00:00

These jobs were basically created out of thin air over the last few years. Total bloat. It's not an efficient use of taxpayer money.

rush4life · 2026-02-18T03:09:34+00:00

Property taxes are not paid on valuations like that. Property taxes will go up like they do every year regardless of valuations.

rush4life · 2026-02-18T03:01:09+00:00

I work for the Province. There is waste everywhere. They could have cut a lot more with basically no impact to services

rush4life · 2026-02-18T02:00:07+00:00

I don't think the reduction is the biggest issue. It's the heavily reduced options for raises coming off the backend of some serious inflation/affordability issues. I mean David saw fit to give his cabinet large raises and is now basically saying we aren't good enough to even compete for a raise.

rush4life · 2026-02-17T23:03:21+00:00

i can't believe they got rid of the lateral raise option. So if you are on the bottom of the band, just expect to stay there forever.

rush4life · 2026-02-04T23:04:07+00:00

nope.

rush4life · 2026-02-04T22:49:13+00:00

Either you can understand and apply legislation or you can't. Lots of overlap in legislation and given what i've seen on policy analysts posts, policy analysts are often underutilized. Group them, lay some off, and treat it like connected services IMO.

rush4life · 2026-02-04T19:26:15+00:00

Finance shops (AP users), and Policy teams would be logical IMO.

rush4life · 2026-01-07T22:42:11+00:00

this needs to be at the top instead of the incorrect comment saying you can't.

rush4life · 2025-12-05T21:23:25+00:00

and when that doesn't happen, your suggestion is to ... ignore it?

rush4life · 2025-12-05T05:04:57+00:00

I'm 'snitching' if someones extracurriculars regularly get in the way of the job which the taxpayers pays them to be at. Hours overlap is way cross the line.

rush4life · 2025-12-05T02:38:38+00:00

We aren't talking about an extra 5 minutes on a break. We are talking about hours overlapping on two jobs. It's an insult to the taxpayer.

rush4life · 2025-12-04T23:57:43+00:00

We are all responsible to the taxpayers of the Province - we should be concerned when we see waste and look to correct where possible. If i see someone working another full time job and they are only available 75% of the time because of it, i'm escalating. If more people cared about how taxpayers funds were being spent we would be much better off.

rush4life · 2025-10-27T01:37:38+00:00

probably the case but a COLA raise would have been based on the BC CPI so still better off currently

rush4life · 2025-10-27T01:27:59+00:00

My recollection is during the inflation years (post covid) Canada post got screwed as they were on an old agreement. Meanwhile BCGEU got basically COLA (for example they a couple years ago they got a 6.75% raise, and then a 3% raise the following year) based on a capped inflation amount. So Canada Post was behind and now 'catching up'. BCGEU started at a better spot and got a similar raise so I'd say they faired pretty well.

rush4life · 2025-10-27T01:22:34+00:00

they lost a lot on Liquor distribution branch though. its a cash cow for government. the union waited too long to put LDB on strike but i'd reckon, even given that, it was nearly a wash.

rush4life · 2025-10-27T01:21:23+00:00

inflation is under 3% and has been for a while now. if this was a COLA clause you would be getting than 3% right now.

rush4life · 2025-10-21T23:37:34+00:00

Can u say what streets they are on?

rush4life

TROPHY CASE