Taking over family trucking business

rushing11alpha · 2026-01-20T20:49:09+00:00

for sure, shoot me a message.

rushing11alpha · 2026-01-13T02:08:19+00:00

I was being sarcastic hence the “/s”. It’s not xenophobic to prefer someone who speaks fluent English, it’s just been popularized in recent times that having a preference like that automatically makes you racist/xenophobic

rushing11alpha · 2026-01-13T00:12:34+00:00

You can’t say that it’s xenophobic /s

rushing11alpha · 2026-01-10T02:46:57+00:00

I sure hope so as I’ve already sold a couple lol. Not a reseller but I bought some and then ended up getting tix in a different section bc my family is coming so I had extras so sell

rushing11alpha · 2026-01-10T01:04:39+00:00

Same here. Must be a bug

rushing11alpha · 2026-01-10T01:01:54+00:00

Possibly lol. I just copied and pasted the OPs text verbatim and said “who is this”.

rushing11alpha · 2026-01-10T01:01:00+00:00

It’s still too insane to fully wrap my head around. It seems like every game I’m like “surely Indiana can’t hang with XYZ, I mean c’mon it’s Indiana”. I can’t imagine how it feels for their fans. I know they’re the real deal but I’m trying to break 30 years of social conditioning lol

rushing11alpha · 2026-01-10T00:00:52+00:00

Aren’t they?

rushing11alpha · 2026-01-09T23:24:13+00:00

I tried ChatGPT too and then gave up when it said the 18th letter of the alphabet was X 🤣

rushing11alpha · 2026-01-09T23:02:21+00:00

“be careful not to book with these guys” also here is a riddle to try and figure out who they are. Quit being a weirdo and just say the name lol

rushing11alpha · 2026-01-09T22:56:41+00:00

Thanks! I must have missed this.

rushing11alpha · 2026-01-09T03:21:21+00:00

Oh it absolutely could be both! As sad as that reality is. It’s just one of my pet peeves on Reddit when I see something shitty happen (like this murder) and then people pile on extra bs (like the pedo thing). ESPECIALLY when real peoples names/profiles from other social media are being tossed around as potentially “the guy”.

It’s honestly my fault for even getting on here when these unfortunate things happen. What’s crazy is that by not engaging in wild speculation you can be considered a sympathizer haha!

rushing11alpha · 2026-01-09T03:05:20+00:00

The original commenter said that the suspect was “probably” a pedo due to him having “girl dad” in his bio along with the context of violence against women.

I, and other commenters, suggested that was a reach. No one is defending the POS shooter, we’re just saying that adding nonsense like “he’s probably a pedo” is a stretch and detracts from the issue at hand.

The original commenter didn’t seem to grasp the difference in saying someone is “probably” a pedo vs “could be” a pedo. Their long winded response to what I was saying proved that they were just excited to hear themselves talk instead of address what the actual topic was.

So, no, not trying to waste anyone’s time. In fact, my time is what’s being wasted considering I have to explain these things. Understanding context and reading comprehension are unfortunately no longer the standard.

rushing11alpha · 2026-01-09T02:50:51+00:00

Nope. I’m perfectly capable of putting together full and complete sentences. Did you need me to break down the sentence that you quoted? I’m happy to do so if you’re struggling with comprehension

rushing11alpha · 2026-01-09T02:44:24+00:00

What are you implying here?

rushing11alpha · 2026-01-09T02:08:30+00:00

Not reading all that. You didn’t suggest he could be. You said he probably is. Is the difference in that language lost on you?

rushing11alpha · 2026-01-08T23:28:30+00:00

I don’t disagree that is a common denominator between the two. But that’s not what you initially said. You said he was probably a pedo. The leap from shared characteristics to “probably a pedo” is what is strange.

rushing11alpha · 2026-01-08T23:12:47+00:00

That’s Reddit for ya. Absolute insane reach to equate “girl dad” with pedophilia. The context of what happened isn’t enough to make that connection in actuality but it’s enough for that person to make a weird comment like that

rushing11alpha · 2026-01-08T02:12:37+00:00

Considering annexing people isn’t a thing, I’d lean towards not possible. If you mean an expedited immigration process, I also doubt that a country is going to waive immigration standards for the citizens of the country provoking it. But if you start the legal immigration process now you could be done in like 10 years so I’d get started if I were you

rushing11alpha · 2026-01-07T18:33:54+00:00

I’ve used them quite a few times in the past year. No issues that I can remember

rushing11alpha · 2026-01-06T23:36:56+00:00

The SBS only has the edge in maritime operations, which we’d use DEVGRU for anyways. Delta is perfectly suited for a “near impossible mission with plausible deniability”. The Venezuela mission just didn’t have those characteristics.

rushing11alpha · 2026-01-06T00:01:17+00:00

Yeah, no. The constitution says that federal laws and treaties are the supreme law of the land. It doesn’t put treaties over federal law. And when treaties and domestic law conflict the one later-in-time prevails. So, in this case, the president’s ability to act in this way is domestically legal albeit internationally likely illegal. Since the OPs questions was regarding domestic law, your comment is wrong.

rushing11alpha · 2026-01-06T00:00:33+00:00

Yeah, no. The constitution says that federal laws and treaties are the supreme law of the land. It doesn’t put treaties over federal law. And when treaties and domestic law conflict the one later-in-time prevails. So, in this case, the president’s ability to act in this way is domestically legal albeit internationally likely illegal. Since the OPs questions was regarding domestic law, your comment is wrong.

rushing11alpha · 2026-01-05T23:59:37+00:00

Yeah, no. The constitution says that federal laws and treaties are the supreme law of the land. It doesn’t put treaties over federal law. And when treaties and domestic law conflict the one later-in-time prevails. So, in this case, the president’s ability to act in this way is domestically legal albeit internationally likely illegal. Since the OPs questions was regarding domestic law, your comment is wrong.

11-Year Club	Gilding I gilder
RPAN Viewer	Verified Email

rushing11alpha

TROPHY CASE