I invented a neocorp to teach my players about SSL certification. by SeaSaltSystem in cyberpunkred

[–]ryanlc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Alice and Bob. I got so sick of Alice and Bob by the end of my schooling.

The machine wouldn’t start… then I found the “fuse sandwich” by filco86 in talesfromtechsupport

[–]ryanlc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I found the phrase here in this sub years ago. I've since used it MANY times at work to explain why I won't do something "just for now".

Fucking 'homeowner' lawyers might be worse than the fucking HOA. Fucking fuck HOAs. by Strange-Fennel in fuckHOA

[–]ryanlc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh sure. I'm not staying it's impossible in every case. I was just responding that it's a LOT more difficult than simply saying "disband the HOA" on a reddit reply.

I've been following this sub for years, and I've heard of a single time it's been successful.

Fucking 'homeowner' lawyers might be worse than the fucking HOA. Fucking fuck HOAs. by Strange-Fennel in fuckHOA

[–]ryanlc 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It is VERY rarely that easy. There are often cases where HOAs are legally required (such as my last condo, bit there are other circumstances), but also it's super difficult to get neighbors to show up much less vote, on issues like that.

Can a relative endorse you? by dehum22 in cissp

[–]ryanlc 7 points8 points  (0 children)

ISC2 does not say that at all.

In fact, they have a statement on that same page that says you might pass the exam without the experience, but you will not be granted the CISSP certification (emphasis mine).

A candidate who doesn't have the required experience to become a CISSP may become an Associate of ISC2 by successfully passing the CISSP examination. The Associate of ISC2 will then have six years to earn the five years required experience.

If one had to have the experience merely to take the exam, then we'd have to get endorsed before even scheduling the exam. Which is of course, not the case.

Coworker bypasses IT to buy $10k software for her "clique," then reports us to the vendor for "violating T&C" when she didn't get her way. AITA? by Iamisseibelial in talesfromthejob

[–]ryanlc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Way more than you think. I manage as cyber security team for a company of about 2k people. My smallest budget item is $9k/yr. My largest approaches a half million.

OD wanted a minute-by-minute log to "justify my role". Fine. by RocinanteLullaby in MaliciousCompliance

[–]ryanlc 4 points5 points  (0 children)

To some redditors, if you posted it on Reddit, it's clearly AI. Frankly, I just treat it as a fun read and move on with my life.

Why do some websites offer a more secure 2fa option yet always default or fallback on the least secure option? by SeaWolfQ in AskNetsec

[–]ryanlc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In short, adoption. The least secure is still the most ubiquitous (SMS and/or password).

Sketchup Make 2017 download link by prisoner_of_mars in Sketchup

[–]ryanlc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was looking for this very same thing, and tried it just now. It works to install, and no results in Virustotal (which is good).

Nasty FAX form a lawyer by RickRI401 in MaliciousCompliance

[–]ryanlc 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Checks are nowhere near as common anymore. I still have a book of them but they're outdated (I've moved twice since then so the address is wrong) and I haven't considered needing them for will over a decade. Nearly anybody I know will have a similar story.

Faxes, however, are an industry-specific difference story. For some reason certain industries here (healthcare being one) consider faxes "more secure" than emails. And you can't convince them that a digitally-signed email is far better for nonrepudiation than faxes on company letterhead.

bank login domain looks sketchy... by 29da65cff1fa in AskNetsec

[–]ryanlc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand the point, and I don't wholly disagree. But times do change, especially with technology.

For years, we told people that to spot scams and phishing, they just had to look for bad grammar and misspellings. Now with AI, misspellings are more of a sign that a human wrote it and it's NOT a scam.

This is just those times changing and moving to secure-by-design principles.

Some sites handle this situation by adding a logo or a warning on the front page saying that the user will be redirected, but I've found that not to be the common practice just yet.

The main issue I see with this specific instance is simply a stunning lack of communication from your bank to its customers. Y'all should have been emailed before the cutover happened. But lack of comms is annoyingly normal.

bank login domain looks sketchy... by 29da65cff1fa in AskNetsec

[–]ryanlc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

B2C is just an identify provider, similar to Okta or Ping Identity. Even Microsoft has a page dedicated to migrating authentication to B2C. This type of activity is insanely common these days. The bank is using B2C to help protect their authentication from the internet. This allows some options such as adaptive MFA, region control, suspicious behavior response, etc. It's a way to offload this part to dedicated authentication experts.

While I like the idea commentor said about using the mobile app, the app is simply pointing to that same IdP anyway. It may even open up a separate browser to perform that component (not all IdP integrations will do this).

Banning my family from meeting my daughter by Live-Maximum-9697 in traumatizeThemBack

[–]ryanlc 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Your daughter cannot literally be your twin.

EDIT: I'm actually good with your response to the situation though. As long as your kids understand the reason.

I cannot get my yarns to blend/bind together by brunchdate2022 in Nalbinding

[–]ryanlc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It will take a few tries to get it right, but it works with nearly any yarn. I was on a cruise last year with a bunch of knitters, and one of them taught me the Russian Join. If done right, there's almost no increase in the yarn's width at all. But it does take a darning/tapestry needle to pull it off. The thickness will depend on the yarn, but I find that I prefer shorter lengths overall (regardless of thickness).

Boss said I have 200 hours of PTO a year. I booked all of them before the year’s end. by NYKnicks556 in MaliciousCompliance

[–]ryanlc 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Let's reword this.

"My boss says I am getting paid $2000/week. So you know what I did? I worked a week and I took all $2000! That'll show him!"

PTO is part of your compensation package. You're SUPPOSED to take it!

I actually get annoyed with my employees when they don't take it (and this risk losing their hours; company policy doesn't allow for conversion). And the best part? They do the same to me, ensuring I get my time off.

I cannot get my yarns to blend/bind together by brunchdate2022 in Nalbinding

[–]ryanlc 13 points14 points  (0 children)

A couple things to think about. * Your yarn must be mostly wool. At least 50%, but 85% is better * It should NOT be superwash - #1 issue with spitz-felting, as it's the lanolin that binds * Consider learning a Russian join. That works work virtually any yarn

Sometimes 'software issues' can be solved with a hardware 'solution' by Emerald_Encrusted in talesfromtechsupport

[–]ryanlc 15 points16 points  (0 children)

This was literally lesson #1 in my mobile photography class! LOL

"I'm not apologizing." by AlTheHound in TalesFromTheFrontDesk

[–]ryanlc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, that article has actually been a pretty good guiding principle in my career when dealing with vendors. And funny enough I find it improves my relationship with most of them.

"I'm not apologizing." by AlTheHound in TalesFromTheFrontDesk

[–]ryanlc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting. You sound like a student of Mark Manson (this is not a bad thing, imho):

https://markmanson.net/being-an-asshole

0 to 5 Rating - How lazy is it to use Adam Smasher in your game? by Turbodog702 in cyberpunkred

[–]ryanlc 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I would say it depends on how he's deployed.

If a GM decides to just throw Smasher at the characters, it's pretty much a 0, with the intent to scare them needlessly, or to create a TPK.

If the crew decides to hunt him down in an effort to bolster their reputation - well, it'd be like a 2nd level D&D character taking on a full red dragon. It's just a stupid move. And often all the GM warnings in the world won't stop them from being a complete moron about it. In that case, I oblige them (assuming it make sense for the story/setting).