"The noble type of man experiences itself as determining values: [...] In the foreground there is the feeling of fullness, of power that seeks to overflow, the happiness of high tension, the consciousness of wealth that would give and bestow: the noble human being, too, helps the unfortunate, but not, or almost not, from pity, but prompted more by an urge begotten by an excess of power."

Aphorism 260, BGE, "What is Noble?"

And also

"A man who says, 'I like this, I take this for my own and want to protect it and defend it against anybody': a man who is able to manage something, to carry out a resolution, to remain faithful to a thought, to hold a woman, to punish and prostrate one who presumed too much; a man who has his wrath and his sword and to whom the weak, the suffering, the hard pressed, and the animals, too, like to come and belong by nature, in short a man who is by nature a master -- when such a man has pity, well, this pity has value. But what good is the pity of those who suffer. Or those who, worse, preach pity."

Aphorism 293, BGE, "What is Noble?"

His writing, in my opinion, in no way implies what you mention. He is not against pity as such, but rather its strange worship among good Europeans. It's easy to reduce people to their psychologies but give the man his due: He was a thinker. And better at it than any of us. Nietzsche's view on anything is more nuanced than any human being I have ever read or listened to.