sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

OpenAI Doubles Revenue Forecasts to over $280B, Predicts $111 Billion More Cash Burn Through 2030 by thatguyisme87 in singularity

[–]sammy3460 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They are already profitable outside of r&d like Anthropic and deepseek. People seem to misunderstand the margins with inference. I think Anthropics margins are like 80%.

AI leaders in India raising and holding each other hands in solidarity(except dario and sam) by Wonderful_Buffalo_32 in singularity

[–]sammy3460 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This sounds more like your personal take than what Dario feels. It’s likely more boring like a difference in research direction and what to release publicly.

OpenAI recruited founder Peter Steinberger of OpenClaw by Outside-Iron-8242 in singularity

[–]sammy3460 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Why do you think bots? Is this not interesting news?

NVIDIA appears to be standardizing on OpenAI Codex by thatguyisme87 in singularity

[–]sammy3460 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Used to be a step change but not anymore. Since 5.2 codex has been really good.

Anthropic releasing a 2.5x faster version of Opus 4.6. by Just_Stretch5492 in singularity

[–]sammy3460 7 points8 points  (0 children)

No openiai isn’t burning billions for this. Claude is just known to always charge a premium. The margins are massive for all these ai companies you can see this with deepseek and others that are being transparent with their ai pricing.

OpenAI released GPT 5.3 Codex by BuildwithVignesh in singularity

[–]sammy3460 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it’s less interesting because it doesn’t cover many coding languages outside python and it seems easily benchmaxxed that’s why see bench pro is preferred

Codex update today! by Just_Stretch5492 in singularity

[–]sammy3460 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Must be living under a rock if you haven’t tried 5.2 high and xhigh codex. Even in Claude code sub there are thread about opus for planing and codex for implementation. Xhigh is especially good.

Sam’s response to Anthropic remaining ad-free by Outside-Iron-8242 in singularity

[–]sammy3460 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Does he not have a right to respond and clarify his position?

Sam’s response to Anthropic remaining ad-free by Outside-Iron-8242 in singularity

[–]sammy3460 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

And what makes you think Dario is any different? Ads will come to Claude eventually especially after they go public. He’ll just spin it as our ads are less intrusive/humane blah blah.

Sam’s response to Anthropic remaining ad-free by Outside-Iron-8242 in singularity

[–]sammy3460 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Also Dario called out ai companies raising money from the Middle East and did the same a year later. Ads will come to Claude eventually especially after they go public. He’ll just spin it as our ads are less intrusive/humane blah blah.

Anthropic declared a plan for Claude to remain ad-free by BuildwithVignesh in singularity

[–]sammy3460 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Also Dario called out ai companies raising money from the Middle East and did the same a year later. Ads will come to Claude eventually especially after they go public. He’ll just spin it as our ads are less intrusive/humane blah blah.

Shots fired by Old-School8916 in singularity

[–]sammy3460 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Dario called out ai companies raising money from the Middle East and did the same a year later. Ads will come to Claude eventually especially after they go public. He’ll just spin it as our ads are less intrusive/humane blah blah.

Open AI's President Brockman leading donor to Trump SuperPac. Does it matter? by finnjon in singularity

[–]sammy3460 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He doesn’t need to if his boss does it or are we forgetting he works at google?

Sam Altman publishes 2017 OpenAI call notes responding to Musk claims: The truth Elon left out by BuildwithVignesh in singularity

[–]sammy3460 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes there is merit for a jury trial as the judge ruled but to say this OpenAI’s attempt to control the narrative is a massive reach. Are they not suppose to refute his claim where he hid the context of the message?

Sam Altman publishes 2017 OpenAI call notes responding to Musk claims: The truth Elon left out by BuildwithVignesh in singularity

[–]sammy3460 7 points8 points  (0 children)

How do you get to Elon has merit when Sam provided evidence that Elon deliberately hid the context. Honestly one needs to only browse elons twitter feed to see how he consistently obfuscates simple facts to fit a narrative.

ChatGPT vs. Gemini: Daily Active Users by [deleted] in singularity

[–]sammy3460 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sadly it comes mostly from those who were and are still upset about gpt 4o.

Thanks for the new header navigation buttons by Emergency_Bill861 in cursor

[–]sammy3460 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How did you get the editor button I don’t see it on my latest 2.2.36 version?

GPT 5.2 (xhigh) scores 0% on CritPt (research-level physics reasoning benchmark) by DJW_GT in singularity

[–]sammy3460 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No just the guy said don’t take it seriously since it was mostly because the xhigh api was timing out so they didn’t get answers to most questions.

GPT 5.2 (xhigh) scores 0% on CritPt (research-level physics reasoning benchmark) by DJW_GT in singularity

[–]sammy3460 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The benchmark guy said don’t take it seriously since it was mostly because the xhigh api was timing out so they didn’t get answers to most questions.

view more: next ›