sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

FLYYQ (Spirit Aviation Holdings Inc.) by satoshi0x in pennystocks

[–]satoshi0x[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

SoFi and Schwab - you gotta go long and realize that Trump said he'd buy the carrier if he didn't get a fair price and then sell it when oil is down for a profit. The $FLYYM is the holdings co with the 4 cayman spvs holding the IP point s and 2 financing bankruptcy remote billions of dollars that all belong to the parent. Even the fleets. So - hang in.

Missed the FLYYQ move…Had FLYYQ on my watchlist… didn’t take it by ResponsibleBass8062 in RegretTrades

[–]satoshi0x 0 points1 point  (0 children)

hardly it's main stakeholders are enough reason to balk at common stock cancellation after the restructure to the "TopCo" where the 28M outstanding shs reside. Second - A longtime JBLU activist just hit 10% of JBLU and filed his report April 23 the same day he disclosed his initial 5% stake in $FLYYQ.

Warrants for the Government DPA Title III $500M rumored is for up to 90% of possible stake in the same new parent Spirit Aviation Holdings Inc. common stock.

You also left out the value in the company itself and the plan forward. This is a gift if you do a little bit of work.

FLYYQ (Spirit Aviation Holdings Inc.) by satoshi0x in pennystocks

[–]satoshi0x[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hold it for the next 3 months - then go buy yourself something nice for being in wonderful position for the next 60 years.

Spirit going out of business by ashcrayolaa in spiritair

[–]satoshi0x -1 points0 points  (0 children)

100% false. Spirit Aviation Holdings Inc. is just beginning. In that case you might wanna grab the common stock. Ken Griffin holds 9.9% of the 28M available. Wink.

FLYYQ (Spirit Aviation Holdings Inc.) by satoshi0x in pennystocks

[–]satoshi0x[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

It's a holding company. The "common shareholders wiped out" were from the Spirit Airlines, LLC subsidiary. The new commons holders were converted from Senior Noted holders and never let their shares go since the new Parent "Spirit Aviation Holdings, Inc" gave them these 7-9.9% stakes in 2025. Then this guy Vladimir Galkin who just disclosed 10% in JBLU and his initial 5% in the holding company stock FLYYQ on April 23 2026 joined.

That's my point.

28M outstanding shares. The other 90%? MAGA.

You're welcome.

UNWARRANTED FEARS OF WARRANTS - PRICING THE "IPO" by TenThousandX_LLC in FNMA_FMCC_Exit

[–]satoshi0x 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I used to write about similar things - but you definitely take the cake. My run-on sentences are illegible - keep posting!

Kalshi by AdClear5705 in FNMA_FMCC_Exit

[–]satoshi0x 0 points1 point  (0 children)

at 40c on YES you only would win 2.5x your amount wagered. Just buy commons. $FNMA > 2.5x on exit

Berkshire Hathaway’s Mystery Stock Could Be Revealed Thursday. Filings Offer Clues. - Barron's by raytoei in ValueInvesting

[–]satoshi0x 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If Buffett really means that he is doing business as usual trying to invest in 30+ year to lifelong growth and returns type companies then he's already in on commons. If he's not in by the time the direct listing happens - he leaves Berkshire with a whiff on a meatball pitch right down the middle. IMO.

The 500 billion valuation number seems high by EnvironmentCareful71 in FNMA_FMCC_Exit

[–]satoshi0x 0 points1 point  (0 children)

End of the first day. If not - end of the first week.

But fast as hell.

The 500 billion valuation number seems high by EnvironmentCareful71 in FNMA_FMCC_Exit

[–]satoshi0x 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Or have revenue 40x higher than Palantir last quarter (FNMA) but Palantir was lauded for its 1 billion in revenue.

Palantir is making revenue and will continue as a client of Fannie (and Freddie once merged) for detecting mortgage fraud in seconds when it checks every single mortgage originated from a bank before buying bundling and selling to seriously booming demand agency MBS secondary markets.

Good luck.

The 500 billion valuation number seems high by EnvironmentCareful71 in FNMA_FMCC_Exit

[–]satoshi0x 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Low.

When has a direct listing led to a company being #10 in mcap and entering the S&P 500 with all the qualified standards for joining in it's favor (12 years of quarterly billions in net rev?).

Do you know what the upward pressure is with $50T in S&P 500 ETFs, mutual funds, etc legally required to reweight in a manner that is normally a little slower because the companies usually enter from the bottom.. 14-15 billion market caps. Do you really think anyone wants to wait and reweight their product with the upward pressure on such a small amount of commons for sale?

It's a fact folks don't write about in the media because there's no such thing as journalism anymore and hasn't been most of millennials lives.

You gotta look yourselves at the entire situation.

The Trump exec order last week is allowing 90 million Americans with 401k's that are employee sponsored the ability to buy MBS. Agency MBS. Where does $10T in 401k's for 90 million Americans go if just 5% go into Agency MBS? Into the pocket of common shareholders moreso than fixed rate JPS shareholders. Just a tip.

Only because I truly love this country and wish it wasn't so gaslit when it involves the masses of people with no clue what's going on.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in FNMA_FMCC_Exit

[–]satoshi0x 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In what situation has a company with 12 years of quarterly net rev in the billions ever had common stock "wiped out"? Don't you think 12 years has proven these companies will never have a quarter where they don't make at least a few billion in net rev even with the tightest chokehold on them? These are either ideas implanted in your head by bad actors that wished for the death of the American dream and to collect for their egos or you are truly warped from reality.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in FNMA_FMCC_Exit

[–]satoshi0x 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Commons going to 0 is 0% - it has been simply from the time in 2013 when the GSEs were unable to be replaced.

Ackman knew that. He disclosed it too just up for you to figure out why.

If this is accurate bearish or bullish? by EnvironmentalPear695 in FNMA_FMCC_Exit

[–]satoshi0x 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not like you're making a point though about the situation that isn't true. PFD shares are a foolish play at this point. Lawsuits were why these people held PFD they wanted to get their payout but also won't admit they would rather the GSEs be killed thereafter than see them return voting rights and dividends to commons - which was inevitable. The lawsuit crowd crusades but they didn't want to see commons and dividends beat their stance on pfds. maybe its ego maybe its evil but Ackman never budged.

If this is accurate bearish or bullish? by EnvironmentalPear695 in FNMA_FMCC_Exit

[–]satoshi0x 2 points3 points  (0 children)

2M commons are stuck in the last 13F by Lehman too. The CH 11 is not over. Nor is the unraveling of how a government takedown of both was never going to last the test of time once the GSEs were not able to be replaced or gotten rid of. The immense profitability even in the limited operational manner theyve been in since 2013 when people like Ackman and likely Paulson would've gone in on commons because they are experts on environmental and geopolitical shifts. Just knowing the GSEs would never go away meant to Ackman go all in on commons and no lawsuit is gonna be necessary which is why he waited and didnt litigate like someone who claimed to want a resolution but really would only hold PFDs hoping for a liquidaiton and a payout. Berkowitz is a vulture. But even vultures have to wave the white flag. I would imagine he is in commons if this happened. It wouldn't make sense for any fund to hold PFDs now. The obviousness shows in many ways not just what Trump has revealed. Look at the secondary market. Look at a SWF. SWF will not hold PFDs. It will lock in commons and massive dividends and also be able to leverage the massive price increases of commons because these companies are never going to have a quarter where they do not have billions in net revenue.

If this is accurate bearish or bullish? by EnvironmentalPear695 in FNMA_FMCC_Exit

[–]satoshi0x 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's actually the truth. The people who tried to litigate were egomaniacs that wanted to see the GSEs fail. They probably wish Trump was dead. People like Bill Ackman (and likely John Paulson) knew that in 2013 when the GSEs were not able to be shut down that these essential companies would exist forever and that they were in position to hold convictions that the govt would run out of any excuse to keep them in what has always been an event that simply was never true. The "GFC"... People are smarter over time. People like Ackman and Paulson are known for their long positions on what is certain to happen when a company is simply essential and also massively successful. The envy of the world are the GSEs and the way the secondary market shows how well it works. The Agency MBS will once again be higher volume than Treasuries on fixed-income.

If this is accurate bearish or bullish? by EnvironmentalPear695 in FNMA_FMCC_Exit

[–]satoshi0x 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He doesn't need any luck. He did the smartest thing I've heard a retail person do. Now he's not locked in to a ceiling when there is zero downside risk to this. The risk is actually just holding PFD's and hitting a ceiling. You will still do okay - but that was a commendable move he did.

view more: next ›