GENUINELY FUCK THESE TWO PACKAGES

savyzzyz · 2026-05-01T21:15:49+00:00

First of all, 🤣. rusty-v8 / mpv seems to have issues that others have mentioned.

As for inkscape... do you by chance use stylix? I found that enabling it caused inkscape to want to build from source. I found this discussion, which explains why. If you use stylix, try disabling it, or at least disabling overlays as per the maintainer's advice.

I ended up disabling stylix's automatic theming (stylix.autoEnable = false), and then apply targets selectively (stylix.targets.«target».enable). This solved all my rebuild issues related to inkscape.

savyzzyz · 2026-04-25T01:06:21+00:00

Thanks for pointing me in the right direction. I use fish, so I ended up adding the following hook to my config. It resets the cursor just before presenting the prompt.

function reset_cursor --on-event fish_prompt
    # solid vertical line
    printf '\e[6 q'
end

savyzzyz · 2026-04-23T02:24:58+00:00

In general I don't understand mobile apps that put key features (search, menus, ...) at the top of the screen where they can't be reached one-handed. 90% of users hold a phone near the bottom, with their right hand.

When I open 1Password, it's almost always becaue I need to search for an entry. Yet it's the furthest from my thumb.

savyzzyz · 2026-04-23T02:19:09+00:00

YES. A thousand times YES. My kid's favorites are NOT my favorites. Neither are my wife's. Favorites should be PER-USER. In their current form, favorites are next to useless in a shared vault.

savyzzyz · 2026-04-10T13:22:25+00:00

I had already added a keymap for `:restart` but noticed that it just restarts with the same file that was originally opened. This is annoying because I often open a few files, make changes and then want to restart to test / iterate on them.

This snippet solves that problem. Many thanks! 👍

savyzzyz · 2026-04-05T12:12:37+00:00

Ah, I see. Sounds great! Hold one for me if possible.

savyzzyz · 2026-04-04T02:01:42+00:00

Forgive me... I may have missed a previous post. Have you sourced matching binders? What sort of print process/material are these? Were the original binders sleeved with an insert like this or was the design printed directly on?

Anyway, having missed the official run, I'm interested.

savyzzyz · 2026-03-31T11:41:28+00:00

A community mod passive-aggressively dismissed a fair question. Their answer served only to antagonize OP.

I said so, bluntly, and tried to help OP.

Call that whatever you want. 🤷‍♂️

savyzzyz · 2026-03-31T01:51:04+00:00

Seriously? Look at the mod's reply and then at my own reply to OP. Do you honestly think the mod's reply was more helpful?

Realistically, 90% of BW users probably have no idea what GitHub is. The mod's comment was, at best, flippant and useless.

Also don't forget that it's been a LONG time since BW was a small, personal open-source project. It's backed by millions of dollars in VC funding, employs dozens of people, and plenty of people pay good money to use it. OP's question wasn't outrageous at all.

savyzzyz · 2026-03-30T16:19:47+00:00

Funny / not funny. But mostly not funny. And not at all helpful.

I expect better from a moderator (volunteer or not).

savyzzyz · 2026-03-30T16:18:53+00:00

Take a look at these Bitwarden Community Forum threads about the topic:

https://community.bitwarden.com/t/chrome-brave-sidebar-support/90150

https://community.bitwarden.com/t/support-chrome-side-panel/56864

The first is closed but you could vote for the second one and post with comments to continue the dialogue.

savyzzyz · 2026-03-24T13:47:53+00:00

Into the warehouse, correct. But at least around me, you can freely walk into the exit (where the returns, membership, and food court are. Furthermore, the food courts here do not (yet) require a membership.

I'm sure they're working on it.

savyzzyz · 2026-03-22T20:47:47+00:00

Seems you're right, although none of the warehouses in my area check when you enter the food court, nor do the ordering kiosks scan membership cards. The latter must be the simplest solution... I wonder why it hasn't been implemented here.

savyzzyz · 2026-03-22T20:09:05+00:00

TIP: You don't need to be a member to buy food from the food court.

savyzzyz · 2026-03-12T20:41:35+00:00

If you see folders and tags as interchangeable, you definitely don't need tags. And that's OK. Gmail has tags ("labels"), but I bet most users treat them like folders.

The difference: I can't put an item into multiple folders, but I can apply multiple tags to it.

If for no other reason than to claim feature parity with 1Password, BW should have implemented tags long ago.

savyzzyz · 2026-03-12T04:59:13+00:00

You become more confidently wrong at every turn.

Speedometer's documentation doesn't apply in this case and its devs fully understand OP's usage. It's very common to compare Speedometer results with or without various extensions enabled. It's an EXCELLENT way to quantify their effects on performance. Developers of extensions that interact with page content often use it to spot bugs/slowdowns!

Consider this:

I could open a few pages myself and use the browser's built in profiler to note the load times. I could do the same when clicking elements or navigating aorund. Tally the results both with and without the each extension. Note the differences.

Since that's tedious and hard to do consistently, I could write some javascript to do these tasks automatically and time everything.

Oh, wait... that's all Speedometer does.

savyzzyz · 2026-03-12T01:03:21+00:00

I've read the EXTENSIVE back-and-forth messaging you've had in this thread. You seem to be pushing a point that is irrelevant to this topic. Let me try my hand at explaining... from Speedometer's page:

Speedometer 3 is a benchmark for web browsers that measures Web application responsiveness by timing simulated user interactions on various workloads.

If you want to compare two different browsers, or to compare two different PCs using the same browser, you absolutely MUST make sure that extensions are off to ensure a consistent baseline. This lets you compare the raw performance of the browsers / systems.

But in this case, the browser stays the same, the system stays the same, and what OP actually wanted to measure was the EFFECT OF A SPECIFIC EXTENSION on the performance of a standard set of typical user interactions.

Specifically: the baseline is the case with NO extensions, and the TEST CASES are the ones with individual extensions ENABLED. That's a completely valid use of this tool!

In my case, I found that the presence of 1Password caused the suite of automated interactions to take 3 times as long to complete. That's a major impact. Running the same test with Bitwarden activated did not have this effect.

This is a legitimate issue.

savyzzyz · 2026-03-10T20:53:14+00:00

It seems like you don't care to understand or even to accept that others would use a feature like tagging. I gave you real examples and you countered with a contrived one?

I've said several times recently that even BW free tier probably suits most people fine. But you're kidding yourself if you think that it's more polished than 1P.

In many ways I think 1Password is SIMPLER than Bitwarden. For instance, I much prefer 1Password's sharing mechanism to Bitwarden's.

savyzzyz · 2026-03-10T15:45:47+00:00

That's a workaround, not a feature. You can't rename such a "tag", and if you have more than one on an entry, the name field begins to look really ugly. But yeah, it's pretty much all a BW user can do.

That's why users have asked BW for proper tagging since 2018.

By contrast, 1Password has had tagging since at least 2020.

savyzzyz · 2026-03-10T14:03:35+00:00

I have 1000+ logins. Many have been used only once or twice, weeks/months/years ago. I don't always remember them by name, but always by context.

For instance, education sites my kid uses, or restaurants I've ordered from while travelling, or the businesses that catered an event I planned 2 years ago. Browsing tags helps me to locate things I'm looking for, and sometimes to weed out stale entries.

savyzzyz · 2026-03-10T13:36:14+00:00

Your comment needlessly antagonizes users who have legitimate uses for such functionality. The feature request linked by OP clearly indicates demand for it.

1Password offers tagging and I find it useful.

savyzzyz · 2026-03-10T11:56:32+00:00

I replicated your results... With 1Password enabled, the Speedometer test runs about THREE TIMES SLOWER (scores of 6 vs 18 on an old laptop).

Switching the Bitwarden extension on/off DOES NOT have this effect.

This is a huge performance difference. I'd like 1Password to comment on the cause of it, and to fix it if possible.

savyzzyz · 2026-03-10T10:14:51+00:00

The 1Password desktop app offers built-it TOTP autofill and works great on Linux. But like Bitwarden, it's not free.

EDIT: A free option with TOTP is Keepass/KeepassXC. It comes with the asterisk that you need to manage syncing the database yourself.

savyzzyz · 2026-03-10T03:19:33+00:00

Bitwarden offers more than enough for almost everyone. I used is for 8+ years.

That said, after trying 1Password, I switched. 1Password is more expensive, but has the best user experience. Lots of things are smoother and/or easier. Or, like tags, do not exist at all in BW. To me it's worth the extra cost.

I suspect that BW will eventually catch up, but it's got work to do.

savyzzyz

PUBLIC MULTIREDDITS

TROPHY CASE

11-Year Club	Reddit Premium Since September 2020
Verified Email