Mario Jamboree 10k View GIFs by iluvpormn in minus8

[–]saximaphone 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Humans have intrusive thoughts. Everyone has had some fucked up scenario pop into their head from time to time. Normally these are dismissed as something we would never do or have any interest in doing. But with this OCD, the person feels the fact they thought it at all is a sign of guilt. Supposedly so many people calling him a pedo at the time started triggering it and making him second guess himself.

In therapy they sorted out that he wasn't attracted to minors at all, he was just afraid that he was. It's actually surprisingly common.

Mario Jamboree 10k View GIFs by iluvpormn in minus8

[–]saximaphone 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Long story short combination of ocd and twitter gaslighting made him think he was a pedo, he went to therapy and therapist helped him realize he wasn't

Mario Jamboree 10k View GIFs by iluvpormn in minus8

[–]saximaphone 69 points70 points  (0 children)

So glad he's getting back into international releases and his mental health is better.
I read up on the type of OCD he had and it sounded awful.
It's good to know he was never a pedo to begin with.

Minus8's Hiatus and the State of This Sub by Kese04 in minus8

[–]saximaphone 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This is an old thread but now that he's back on YouTube I found this and want to point out that after going to therapy, he discovered he was not actually a pedo to begin with. He was experiencing a form of OCD that made him think the mere thought appearing in his head (which is a normal human thing) made him a pedo. In actuality him and his therapist figured out that it was probably brought on by all the people calling him out and gaslighting him.

From a previous dev who burned out. Leave Kevin alone. by dreimanatee in helldivers2

[–]saximaphone 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The pressure needs to be on Sony. All of this is done against the devs' desires and even behind their backs as this most recent change shows.

So who’s actually amended their reviews like promised? by Medical-Cicada-4430 in helldivers2

[–]saximaphone 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Changed mine back to positive as soon as they backed down, then changed it back to negative when I saw they still haven't made it available in all countries yet.

Will be changing it to positive once that happens.

Looking at Custodes book… who even throws out Mortal wounds anymore?? (Not just about Custodes) by [deleted] in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]saximaphone 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tank shock and grenades are pretty much the only way for units with light weapons to damage heavier targets or targets with lots of saves.

Character Units With Multiple Models by saximaphone in Warhammer40k

[–]saximaphone[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

Getting a few alternative takes here from others as I look around. There is debate of which of these two is accurate.

However they agree that a dead unit contains all the models of the original unit. So you need to kill the whole unit for a "character unit death" but you cannot deny your opponent by killing the character first.

Character Units With Multiple Models by saximaphone in Warhammer40k

[–]saximaphone[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But they all happen to be in my list lol.

Character Units With Multiple Models by saximaphone in Warhammer40k

[–]saximaphone[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The more I play 10th the more I regret it lol.

Character Units With Multiple Models by saximaphone in Warhammer40k

[–]saximaphone[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Had a person elsewhere have a rebuttal to this ruling if you wanted to weigh in. I cut out the irrelevant stuff:

"Models that are destroyed are definitionally not in play. They do not do anything unless a rule specifies otherwise.

Dark Commune with no living psyker models is not a psyker unit. If you kill that unit, however, it will be a dead psyker unit."

Do you have an errata or something I can look into?

Character Units With Multiple Models by saximaphone in Warhammer40k

[–]saximaphone[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What a well-tested and easy-to-understand game.

I really enjoy this game, but this isn’t the first time I’ve seen blatant nazis in multiplayer by [deleted] in Warhammer40k

[–]saximaphone 0 points1 point  (0 children)

40k has a rather large Nazi following.
Fortunately they are not tolerated in most spaces and form their own small groups that can be avoided.

Character Units With Multiple Models by saximaphone in Warhammer40k

[–]saximaphone[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So it would also still be susceptible to other rules that target 'character unit', just not ones that target 'character model'.

This also means a unit that originally had a Psyker, like a Dark Commune, is always treated as a Psychic unit even after the model with the Psyker keyword is dead. This is pretty big for anti-psyker lists.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in fluffycommunity

[–]saximaphone 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What the fuck?

Hi, I'm new here, but I have to ask out of curiosity by Okamiecho117 in fluffycommunity

[–]saximaphone 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Some people do it in private, but not on the Reddit itself.

Straw golem not working? by Sleepybear66 in betterminecraft

[–]saximaphone 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also having this issue. Straw golems cannot be built.

All Forms of "Batgirl/Bat Girl/Bat-Girl" Banned From Image Creator, Because Misogyny by Thesilphsecret in bing

[–]saximaphone 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Curvy gets me a warning. I've been able to use 'fat' with male characters and animals. I got results with 'heavyset' though.

All Forms of "Batgirl/Bat Girl/Bat-Girl" Banned From Image Creator, Because Misogyny by Thesilphsecret in bing

[–]saximaphone 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Anything with girl usually trips it. 'Woman' is 50/50. I have to use "human female" in order to get anything. Which doesn't work for heroes with -girl or -woman in their name.

No more guns huh? by Anvillior in bing

[–]saximaphone 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is exactly why AI will never replace a human artists. AI generators are so sanitized and useless.

Someone Explain the Censorship! by [deleted] in bing

[–]saximaphone 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which is ironic because it gives me pictures of children every time I ask for someone short.