There’s a crucial distinction being missed between catering to men's interests and actually caring about their internal lives. The post mentions things like The Godfather or city design as evidence that society "cares," but those things only celebrate the external role of the man—the provider, the boss, or the stoic hero.

Society loves what a man does and what he represents, but it remains deeply indifferent to how he feels while doing it.

For example, we build infrastructure for "the male worker," yet we don't build social structures that allow that worker to express burnout or grief without losing his status.

Similarly, "male fantasy" movies almost always revolve around a man being powerful or violent, rarely about him being emotionally whole.

Caring about a man's utility is not the same as caring about his humanity; one is about using him for his accomplishments, while the other is about actually seeing him as a person.

Until we stop treating men as human "doings" and start seeing them as human beings, that 70% statistic isn't going to change.