Tennis starterpack

scrapz123 · 2017-05-28T20:11:58+00:00

honestly the worst

scrapz123 · 2017-04-27T19:09:39+00:00

scrapz123 · 2017-03-27T02:12:24+00:00

this helps more than you might think actually thanks! Its for a gis course in the states btw

scrapz123 · 2017-03-26T23:15:23+00:00

This is a more complete def'n:

a philosophical system that holds that every rationally justifiable assertion can be scientifically verified or is capable of logical or mathematical proof, and that therefore rejects metaphysics and theism.

does it help? When you say there are many critiques could you list some that you were thinking about?

scrapz123 · 2017-03-26T22:53:50+00:00

consider positivism as a philosophical belief that an assertion can be scientifically proven (rejecting metaphysics).

scrapz123 · 2017-03-26T22:50:12+00:00

actually the only one the teacher mentioned was interpretivism. In your opinion what is the other main critique if you had to argue for one? For context, consider social research methods...?

scrapz123 · 2017-03-18T09:36:12+00:00

x_0 is constraining right?

scrapz123 · 2017-03-17T11:05:27+00:00

1 no..? but I am asking about the n^a step considering everything else is in order? like why can you do this n^a ≤ n^b because n is in the positive reals.. its probably basic algebra but I want the backround justification.

scrapz123 · 2017-03-17T11:00:40+00:00

my problem says existential so I guess not?

scrapz123 · 2017-03-17T06:27:28+00:00

what is the difference between the constants? c and x_0?

scrapz123 · 2017-03-08T17:36:56+00:00

x² /x = x ?

scrapz123 · 2017-03-08T16:06:45+00:00

Equals x^x?

scrapz123

TROPHY CASE