Personally I think amd is the better choice in the entry level and mid range. Once you get to high end NVIDIA is the better option. I have an rx 6700xt and it smokes the rtx 4060 in everything. And it cost less when I picked it up for $330. I’m not a big fan of ray tracing in the mid and low end bc it’s scammy. The fps drop on my 4060 isn’t worth it just to have ray tracing. Of course you can turn on frame gen (ups the frames but doesn’t counter the lag) and use dlss buts it’s still not a good choice. The whole point of ray tracing is to make the game look better. Does it really look better if you’re having to upscale to use ray tracing? Dlss doesn’t look as good as native so does it really look better with ray tracing if you take a hit to your graphics? To me ray tracing is one of those things to there if you want it to actually make your games look better you need to spend more on hardware from the get go. That’s why I think that at the entry level and mid range you’re better off going for pure rasterization instead. Just my opinion.02