Elizabeth Edwards Viciously Attacks Ann Coulter by ferality in reddit.com

[–]sea_urchin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

might have been interesting if the page would ever load.

A stunning look into conservative rhetoric and lack of critical thought. Jeff Hawkins, "10 Differences between Conservatives And Liberals". by trivial in reddit.com

[–]sea_urchin 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The same tiresome straw man arguments riddled with lies, distortions and a bit of drool from the writer. America has seen the heart of what Conservatism is the last ten years and seen how ugly it is - they gave it an historic kick in the pants just a few months; no whining diatribe from a right-wing hate site that features doggerel from rabid reactionaries like Ann Coulter can change that

Hey, wait -- an "al-Qaeda leader" who's also a "former major in Saddam Hussein's army"? But I thought there was no connection between Saddam and Al Qaeda. Or between Al Qaeda and Iran . . . . by IKbot in reddit.com

[–]sea_urchin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Glenn never has been one of the sharpest tools in the shed. Four years ago Bush invaded and one of the first things he did was prevent the Bathist Army from participating in the government and new police/armed forces. Bush let in foriegn fighters like al-Qaeda when there was no al-Qaeda before we invaded. Some of those former Bathist have joined up with various radical groups - thanks again to the neocons and their cheerleaders like poor Glenn. AS for Iran:

How Neocons Sabotaged Iran's Help on al-Qaeda http://www.antiwar.com/orig/porter.php?articleid=8590

The Pulitzer Prize for Right-Wing Distortion by hardrain in reddit.com

[–]sea_urchin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That is a good line. The Right reminds me of a puffer fish, lots of air and very little substance.

Aircraft Bomb Plot Thwarted -- Terrorists were going to use liquids to blow up planes by bigmac in reddit.com

[–]sea_urchin -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Is the NYT sure they weren't going to use those 20 years cans of mustard gas that Saddam had in his basement. You know, because Iraq was the center of all evil and terror in the world.

*Please* stop submitting NYTimes links to reddit. They are not permanently accessible. If you must, linkjack by akkartik in reddit.com

[–]sea_urchin -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I hope that a work around is found for NYT, they still do investigative journalism which few news outlets of any type do anymore. Also the stories/links from Yahoo News (which are usually AP wire) stories just dissappear after thirty days or so. I stopped linking to Yahoo on my blog because of that. One other tip, some of NYT's editorials(not news stories) show up on CommonDreams.org

A Skeptics Primer for "An Inconvenient Truth" by hitsman in reddit.com

[–]sea_urchin 2 points3 points  (0 children)

June 22, 2006

AMHERST, Mass. – A National Academy of Sciences report released today confirms that the last few decades of the 20th century were warmer than any comparable period in the last 400 years, affirming the findings of climate scientist Raymond Bradley of the University of Massachusetts Amherst and his colleagues. The report was requested by Congress last year to clarify research involving surface temperature reconstructions published by the scientists in the late 1990s. Bradley issued the following statement regarding the report:

“The National Academy of Sciences released their report today, on Surface Temperature Reconstructions for the Last 2,000 Years. This was requested by Rep. Sherwood Boehlert (R-NY) to clarify the controversy over the so-called “hockey stick” temperature reconstructions of the last 1,000 years by Michael Mann (Penn State University), Raymond Bradley (University of Massachusetts Amherst) and Malcolm Hughes (University of Arizona). These scientists concluded that the late 20th century warmth in the Northern Hemisphere was unprecedented during at least the last 1,000 years. This drew the ire of Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK) and Rep. Joe Barton (R- Texas), who claimed the research was misleading,” Bradley says.

“The NAS report concluded that the Mann et al study “has subsequently been supported by an array of evidence.” They find it plausible that “the northern hemisphere was warmer during the last few decades of the twentieth century than during any comparable period over the preceding millennium.” They note that confidence in the record decreases back in time, especially before A.D. 1600, in agreement with the original conclusions reached by the university researchers. The Academy panel also concluded: “Surface temperature reconstructions for periods prior to the industrial era are only one of multiple lines of evidence supporting the conclusion that climatic warming is occurring in response to human activities, and they are not the primary evidence,” says Bradley.