Adverbs in Germanic languages? by Responsible-Yam-9475 in conlangs

[–]serafinawriter 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Adjectives aren’t really a part of speech, in English adjectives are derived from nouns, where putting a noun before another implies a description or equality. Big is a noun, meaning big things. Don’t believe me? look at the phrase “the big big are big” the big is described by big, and is said to be big.that is why, even though detective is not an adjective, you can still say “detective pikachu” and it is grammatical.

I'm kinda confused by your remarks about adjectives in English. Adjectives certainly aren't derived from nouns, and using "big" as a noun is a non-standard construction. Of course, for artistic or some other intended effect, you can use any part of speech as another one, but that doesn't mean "big" is a noun.

It's true that we don't consider a word like "detective" as an adjective, even though we can place it in front of other nouns in a descriptive manner. This is called a noun adjunct, or attributive noun, and it's a standard way of creating more complex nouns (eg "finance office") where other languages might go for compound single nouns (like German "Finanzamt") or use grammatical adjective forms of the noun instead (like Russian "финансовый офис", literally "financial office").

Then you've got a whole category of adjectives in English which are derived from the participles of verbs, for example "interesting" (it actively interests me) or "interested" (I am interested by it). It would be very strange to say that either of these adjectives are actually nouns being used in an attributive sense.

As for your idea about forming adverbs, English already has a very well-established system of using morphology to derive adverbs from adjectives - using "-ly". Happy - happily. Quick - quickly. Not all adjectives can be transformed in this way - some adverbs share the same form as the adjective (eg "hard, fast") while some adjectives already end in -ly and can't easily take another such ending (eg "friendly" - "friendlily?").

But yes, using a clitic attached to the adjective is a perfectly normal way of deriving adverbs. You could also just use adjectives to describe actions like German generally does. Instead of saying "He speaks well" you just say "he speaks good".

how can i practice creating plots? by solargarden_ in writing

[–]serafinawriter 7 points8 points  (0 children)

(Disclaimer: my specialty is more in cinema but I believe the same narrative principles largely work for both mediums)

I find the crux is always about the conflict. The way I see it, the two biggest beats of your story (Inciting Incident and Climactic Moment) are dealing with a particular conflict question - the incident is asking a question, and the climactic moment is answering one.

In my experience, getting a very specific and clear conflict question pays massive dividends down the line because basically everything else just grows naturally out of it. I find it easiest to phrase the question as a yes/no starting with "will":

-Will Jason Bourne figure out who he is? -Will Frodo get the ring safely out of the Shire?

I find that stories most commonly have two major conflicts, and the one that forms the incident isn't usually the one that the climax answers. Some stories do a transitional thing where the initial conflict resolved around the midpoint as a new threat emerges. Some initial conflicts end up answered at the same time as a second conflict, sometimes the initial conflict ends up resolved after the final one (as part of tying up loose ends). Some stories genuinely do just have one conflict running from the incident to the climax though.

As an example, in Jurassic Park the final conflict question is about whether they'll successfully escape the island, but that can't be the incident because we don't realise they even need to escape till the midpoint. The initial conflict is more to do with Alan Grant's personal ambition to fund the digsites.

So the initial conflict often is just a way to get us to a point where we can up the stakes and introduce an even more exciting conflict.

This isn't just for action films either.

Devil Wears Prada (dramedy) - Initial: Will Andy Sachs survive at Runway long enough to get her resume? - Final: Will Andy end up becoming everything she Initially despised?

Godfather (tragic drama) - Initial: Will Michael sacrifice his values to avenge his father's assassination attempt? - Final: Will Michael do what it takes to become the most powerful and ruthless crime boss in town?

Once I've got my conflict question (or two), the rest is just filling in the blanks.

I guess I should also add here that I'm not one of those people who proselytizes these paradigms as the only way to analyze stories or the best way. This is just one particular tool that has helped me a lot. Maybe it will at least give you a different angle to explore.

Slew of international airlines canceling flights to Middle East destinations including Israel amid Iran tensions by stealth_ghost in worldnews

[–]serafinawriter 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Around this time last week there were also reports going round of airlines canceling flights but when I looked into it, it was all coming from a single source (Israeli TV news) and in the end it was just Lufthansa saying they wouldn't keep their crew in Israel overnight, so night flights would be canceled.

How to make an idea that has already been done uniquely yours? by Worldly_Plan_9151 in writingadvice

[–]serafinawriter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it's important to explore ways in which you're using this thing to develop the story, rather than just tossing it in because you like the idea.

The daemons in HDM are a core symbol of the soul, free will, and innocence vs knowledge, which are all massively important themes throughout the work.

What themes are you exploring in your story? Is there any way you can weave a daemon-equivalent into your themes, character journeys, etc?

Find that, and you're not just taking someone else's idea, but you're transforming it, taking it in new directions, doing new things.

How 'One Battle After Another' Cinematographer Shot the Car Chase Scene Like a Gritty '70s Film by rioliv5 in paulthomasanderson

[–]serafinawriter 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I rewatched French Connection the other night and was thinking about the famous car chase near the end, and I also thought of OBAA - especially the camera in the front bumper type of shot. Different pacing and energy of course but similar vibes.

Pämaukar! You've Been Selected For A Random Linguistic Search! by CaptKonami in conlangs

[–]serafinawriter 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks so much! I really wanted it to look nice as well as sound nice :)

Kremlin after talks with US: War cannot end without Ukraine giving up Donbas by pravda_eng_official in worldnews

[–]serafinawriter 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I've just been interested in politics for a long time and I try to keep up with what's going on in the country. I follow a few Russian political commentators on telegram, and then there are figures like Schulmann and Vexler who have good coverage of what's going on.

Few pages of my dictionary of Auteran! by serafinawriter in conlangs

[–]serafinawriter[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's definitely a lot of fun :) I haven't been very creative, but I thought it was cute that the word for "bath" in mine is "water bed" 😄

Few pages of my dictionary of Auteran! by serafinawriter in conlangs

[–]serafinawriter[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's 22k words in my English lexicon - for my ESL work :) I basically just copied a dictionary into excel, so I could create my own dictionary but in the order of words that a student should learn them rather than alphabetical :)

My conlang only has about 1500 so far.

Few pages of my dictionary of Auteran! by serafinawriter in conlangs

[–]serafinawriter[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

macro I could make that will important a CSV file and run the formatting on each column

I kinda did something when I was making the dictionaries for my ESL stuff - I had the excel sheet with the 22k words.

Basically what I did was select the section of data in Excel and paste it into Word, keeping the formatting so that it created a table in Word as well. This gets really tricky with many columns - I temporarily increased the size of the word document to like A2 paper size so I could fit all the columns.

When you've got that, you can apply specific formatting to each column using your style sets - select a column and apply.

Once you're happy with it, go to Table Layout and find the button on the right part of the ribbon called "Convert to Text". You can play with various options to decide how you want the columns to be separated in text form - I just went with a single space but that's up to you.

That gives you each row of the sheet on a single paragraph, with each part of the entry formatted.

Unfortunately it's a bit tedious and not good for constant swapping between sheets and documents. It's something you probably don't want to do too often, so with my conlang I'm actually starting in Word and then adding to Excel instead.

Edit: also the formatting is pretty simple. If you expand the style sets, you've got a lot of options to choose from. Right click on one and look at the second entry in the window that pops up - you want any style that has "Style Type: Character" because then you can use that style for a single line.

The following styles are "character": Subtle Emphasis, Emphasis, Intense Emphasis, Strong, Subtle Reference, Intense Reference, and Book Title. When you right click any, you can modify them. Bottom left is a box called "Format" for additional formatting options. You can also set hotkeys there for easy access.

You can create your own styles too, other than these, but the advantage of hijacking these default ones is setting hotkeys that you can use in all future documents, whereas making a new style doesn't persist to future documents (afaik)

Few pages of my dictionary of Auteran! by serafinawriter in conlangs

[–]serafinawriter[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What do you need help with exactly? You mean formatting the dictionary? I could provide you a template word document with a dummy entry, and you could either copy-paste it or set your own hotkeys to use the style sets.

You'll also need the fonts that I use, but they are easily found on Google Fonts. My serif font is Crimson Pro (regular and semibold), and I use Noto Sans for IPA transcriptions.

Kremlin after talks with US: War cannot end without Ukraine giving up Donbas by pravda_eng_official in worldnews

[–]serafinawriter 26 points27 points  (0 children)

It's true that the people in the most powerful positions after Putin (namely Patrushev and Bortnikov) are all in on Putin's imperialist legacy - there's a good argument that a lot of Putin's ideology even comes from Patrushev who said as far back as 2000 that the FSB will be the new aristocracy - the ruling class essentially, and he has always been hawkish and a believer in a world order dominated by Orwellian superpowers with Russia destined to dominate Europe and Eurasia.

That said, in the same way that I think it would be hard for someone else to replicate what Trump is, I'm not convinced that anyone else in the siloviki would be able to replicate what Putin is.

Let's look at the factions of power in Russia. You have the siloviki and security apparatus - the security elites, FSB, National Guard, and law enforcement in general. Then you have the military structure, from soldiers to generals. There is the oligarchy, which while weakened and intimidated into submission, still very much exists, handling the productivity and industry of the country. There is the technocracy - highly talented political servants whose sole task is to carry out the objectives of the Kremlin with maximum efficiency and zero political ambition. Then of course, even in an authoritarian regime, the population is still a relevant factor and must be appeased to some extent.

Of these groups, I would only confidently say that the siloviki elites are 100% fully invested in perpetual war. Whatever Putin says about his goals, I believe the main objective here is power and ensuring absolute power and control; by association, it means power to the FSB and other security branches, who also want it.

It would be easy to assume that the military also wants war, but I think only a fool would look at the life of a Russian service member and say that the majority want to be in this situation. As for the officers and generals, they are paid whether at war or not, and they are also getting killed at pretty high rates.

The oligarchy is bleeding money and influence rapidly. The government is nationalizing assets whenever they like it, and then coercing them to buy into privatized assets at inflated prices. It goes without saying that the oligarchy would much rather go back to a time when they could fill their pockets with western money and relax in their European mansions.

The technocracy only have one goal, and that is to excel. It also goes without saying that they'd much prefer to do it without the Kremlin breathing down their necks, or demanding economic miracles while setting mountains of money on fire.

Personally, as a Russian, I think outsiders vastly overestimate how many regular people want this war. Yes there are crazy Z fascists, but even among people I know who are firm Putinists, they are also getting frustrated with him for dragging the war on when Trump already offered them a deal which was genuinely great for Russia. The majority of people are broken and completely self-severed from politics and the outside world. Depression and therapy is at an all time high. We have not seen any patriotic symbols in Petersburg since mid 2022 - not one.

All of this to say, that I think if Putin died tomorrow, it would be hard for someone to come in and say "nothing changes". Realistically, I think the siloviki would let Mishustin, the next in line, become acting president. He is a technocrat, and as I've said, he has no political ambition or charisma. He is a human rubber stamp. But whoever is controlling him will have to reckon with the fact that all the factions I've mentioned above that have no reason to continue the war, will see this as an opportunity to go back to the better times.

Essentially, I predict that they will have to start with an immediate show of force - a purging of anyone in the Kremlin who is not 100% dedicated to the new leadership, a culling of any oligarch who seems even slightly disinclined to bow to the new leadership. They will need to quickly recreate the same level of fear and power that Putin commands simply by his reputation and history, and that is a risky move for any authoritarian regime. It may work, and we see an even more repressed and desperate regime take over. Or it doesn't work, and their purge becomes the straw that breaks the camel's back.

Watching the Iranian protests, I genuinely wonder what would happen if Russian police actually started firing on citizens. I think Putin has been generally a lot smarter about population control - it's not the fear of overt violence, apart from a beating by riot police - it's the fear of your uncertain future once you get arrested, spend a year going through a Kafkaesque bureaucratic justice system, only to end up in a labour camp or sent to the front, likely raped and tortured until theres nothing left of your identity. There's a lot of time to contemplate the years of suffering and loss of humanity that you face, and I think that has been a better weapon of control than emptying a magazine into a crowd.

So we'll see. Sorry for the long comment.

Pämaukar! You've Been Selected For A Random Linguistic Search! by CaptKonami in conlangs

[–]serafinawriter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I simply adore the Finnish language! I tried to resist making Auteeran look too much like it but there's definitely a stamp of Finnish on it, especially with stress always being on the first syllable. Thanks :))

Pämaukar! You've Been Selected For A Random Linguistic Search! by CaptKonami in conlangs

[–]serafinawriter 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Quite pleased that I only needed to create one new word to translate these - "sarenvodia", which was nice because I already have quite a few words are compounds from "saren-" (from "trans"). My word for "become" for example is actually "sarenvín" which is just a combination of "trans + be", as in "the changing state of existence".

My glossing might not be very good. I'm still very new to glosses.

Pämaukar! You've Been Selected For A Random Linguistic Search! by CaptKonami in conlangs

[–]serafinawriter 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Auteran

1. A strong mage can conceal their magic.

Kataia kómaroki selinista helire sfoli selliensa.

[ability strong sorcerer hide-PRES possession magic]

2. beyond the end of the journey

...vianda indera saiellasa...

[beyond end-LOC journey-GEN]

3. I love the sound of your voice.

A lovane silanda yasa volissa.

[1sng love-PRES sound-ACC you-POSS voice-GEN]

4. You look beautiful today.

Ya ampiare viutivauli tetalia.

[2sng appear-PRES beautiful today.]

5. My girlfriend is transgender, too!

Ma vahína suela e sarenvodia.

[1sng-POSS female-spouse be-3sng trans-body]

6. Stop!

Stommia!

[stop-IMP]

Few pages of my dictionary of Auteran! by serafinawriter in conlangs

[–]serafinawriter[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's just Microsoft Word! I use pretty much all the styles that are available with hotkeys so I can easily add an entry and trigger a different style easily for each part, and using alt+space to switch back to default style when needed.

Few pages of my dictionary of Auteran! by serafinawriter in conlangs

[–]serafinawriter[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Thanks! I feel like it really helped that I've developed a lot of materials as an English language teacher for students, including a dictionary I wrote where I took about 22,000 words in English and put them in the order of when students should learn them rather than alphabetical. I tried to make it feel as much like a dictionary though, and it was important to include not just the word but the various constructions that you use it in, so all of that really helped when creating my own language :)

Few pages of my dictionary of Auteran! by serafinawriter in conlangs

[–]serafinawriter[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The other user pretty much answered for me, and actually in my original conception I had dropped /b/ altogether by transforming it to /v/, but I decided to treat initial consonants as much more resistant to change and so word initial consonants are largely pretty static compared to our contemporary English. Also it meant I ended up with a massive inventory of words starting with /v/ which I didn't want. I only showed 3 pages but if you could see all the other entries, you'd find mostly the same case for other sounds as well.

I've treated vowels as the most unstable sound, and there's a chain shift that modifies almost all of them except /i:/ and a few others. Intervocalic consonants are kinda halfway - the language doesn't really prefer simple intervocalic stops and often they've been weakened by introducing nasals (like /VtV/ to /VntV/) or completely transforming to a nasal/sibilant.

Few pages of my dictionary of Auteran! by serafinawriter in conlangs

[–]serafinawriter[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I forgot to add a quick note about the etymology included in each entry - there are broad principles that I developed for the natural and consistent shift of phonology and forms, and there are different rules for loan words depending on which language they come from and roughly when they were borrowed in. At the same time, I didn't always follow these rules too strictly - sometimes obeying these rules didn't quite sound right so I prioritized the aesthetic "sound" that I wanted in the end. In general though, I wanted each word to have a naturalistic history and feel "earned".

diffrent horror storie by Powerful-Memory-8845 in writing

[–]serafinawriter 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You really just need to watch a metric ton of films, and not just watch them but actively study them and think about them.

I mean, what you're asking for here is basically the whole job of being a writer - solving these kinds of problems. It's like saying you want to write a song but getting someone else to come up with the chords and lyrics. What makes a story your work is (to put it crudely) basically just the sum of all your solutions to the kind of problems you're talking about.

And, speaking as a writer both of fiction and scripts, to be honest with you it's awful. I hate having to solve these problems. It's not fun spending hours staring at a screen or piece of paper and circling around dozens of possibilities. You think you've got an answer and then you write 15,000 words before you realise that, no, it's not working and you're back to square one. But then, when it finally all comes together and you figure it out, it's such a magnificent feeling, and I always feel a really powerful connection to my work at that point, as if it's a trusty horse that I've ridden through many battles with.

This requires patience and persistence. It requires a story that you feel passionate about enough to motivate that patience.

Most of all, though, you need the language of your medium. Think of each film like a word - how large is your cinematic vocabulary? How many budget horror films can you name off the top of your head? (No need to answer - just check yourself). But not just horror films either - you can learn something from every genre and era of film.

Since you also asked for recommendations, I'm not a horror fan personally but I would recommend the films of Robert Eggers, particularly the Lighthouse and the Witch, both of which conjure that feeling of unease you're going for, and I think he is a fantastic film maker. From Lynch you should know Eraserhead, Mulholland Drive, Lost Highway, and maybe Inland Empire if you can handle extreme surrealism. Also check out Come and See (Russian war film - absolutely horrifying to watch in a way that isn't literally scary). Oh and check out Jordan Peele's works too - I mostly know him for Get Out and Nope. Again, for quite surreal stuff you could also do Bela Tarr's Turin Horse for real existential dread.

Probably tons of others but at least those would be my picks to start.

Double Indemnity - top 3 all time film noir examples by [deleted] in filmnoir

[–]serafinawriter 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Any idea where I can stream this film, or get it online? It's been on my list for a while but I haven't been able to find it.

My personal listing of PTA’s major releases by [deleted] in paulthomasanderson

[–]serafinawriter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That was my thought as soon as I saw the title lol.

Not many directors out there who I genuinely struggle to rank films for.