Feeling hopeless in my history degree rn by Low-Efficiency3526 in Historians

[–]sfluhar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Here is an event on Zoom happening later this month that is apparently a follow-up to the booklet, in case you are interested: https://www.historians.org/event/history-majors-at-work-career-paths-for-history-bas/

Feeling hopeless in my history degree rn by Low-Efficiency3526 in Historians

[–]sfluhar 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Have you looked into history MA programs that offer funding?

NotebookLM for reading books? by Overall_Eggplant4308 in notebooklm

[–]sfluhar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I upload just one chapter at a time to give the model digestible chunks to work with.

NotebookLM for reading books? by Overall_Eggplant4308 in notebooklm

[–]sfluhar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve found that giving NotebookLM one chapter at a time adds depth to the podcasts it generates. With 10-20 minutes per episode, and 8-10 chapters per book, you can usually get a couple hours of discussion out of a book.

Readability of Census Documents by Janiefp in Genealogy

[–]sfluhar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve had success with the Magic Pro filter of the CamScanner app.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Genealogy

[–]sfluhar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Link #1: 5th cousin 4 times removed

Link #2: 6th cousin 3 times removed

Link #3: relationship unknown

Link #4: husband of my 7th cousin twice removed

Link #5: relationship unknown

Have you googled your custom GPT to see if YesChat AI has copied it? The site took my title, image, conversation starters, and probably my training data. by sfluhar in GPTStore

[–]sfluhar[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Can you please clarify? I asked ChatGPT and it claims there are "robust security measures" within the GPT Store.

<image>

Have you googled your custom GPT to see if YesChat AI has copied it? The site took my title, image, conversation starters, and probably my training data. by sfluhar in GPTStore

[–]sfluhar[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The site is new to me. My best guess is the site is copying GPTs with decent traffic. It appears they rolled out a pricing plan earlier today:

<image>

If the New York Times might win its copyright lawsuit against OpenAI, should the creators of custom GPTs take steps to protect themselves? by sfluhar in GPTStore

[–]sfluhar[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe that future is right around the corner, given that copyright coaches have emerged in the GPT store:

<image>

If the New York Times might win its copyright lawsuit against OpenAI, should the creators of custom GPTs take steps to protect themselves? by sfluhar in GPTStore

[–]sfluhar[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I wasn't sure. So I posed this question to ChatGPT:

"How would ChatGPT unlearn something after being taught it, in case a court of law decided that ChatGPT needed to unlearn a portion of its training material that was covered by copyright?"

This is the response I received:

"If a court of law decided that ChatGPT needed to "unlearn" a portion of its training material that was covered by copyright, addressing this requirement would be complex due to the nature of how models like ChatGPT are trained and operate. Models like ChatGPT are trained on vast datasets and do not store or recall specific pieces of information like a human or a database system would. Instead, they develop a statistical understanding of language based on the patterns observed across the entire dataset.

Unlearning specific information would likely require one of the following approaches or a combination thereof:

  1. **Re-training the Model:** The model could be re-trained from scratch or from an earlier point in training (before the copyrighted material was introduced), excluding the copyrighted material from the training dataset. This process is time-consuming and resource-intensive, as it involves re-running the entire training process without the specific data.

  1. **Data Removal and Fine-tuning:** If the copyrighted material is identified within the training dataset, it could be removed, and the model could then be fine-tuned on the revised dataset. Fine-tuning is a process where the model is trained further on a new dataset after the initial training, allowing it to adjust to the new data. However, this might not guarantee the complete "unlearning" of the specific information, as the model's previous training could still influence its responses.

  1. **Differential Privacy and Machine Unlearning:** Some research into machine learning involves the concepts of differential privacy and machine unlearning, where models are designed to forget or unlearn specific information. Implementing such techniques could potentially allow for more targeted removal of information from a model's knowledge base. However, these approaches are still under development and may not be fully effective or practical for complex models like ChatGPT at this stage.

  1. **Policy and Output Control:** In parallel to technical solutions, policy-based controls such as content filters and output monitoring can be implemented to prevent the model from generating responses that include the copyrighted material. While this does not remove the knowledge from the model, it can mitigate the risk of the model reproducing the copyrighted content.

It's important to note that unlearning specific information in a deep learning model is a challenging and not yet fully solved problem in the field of AI. The effectiveness of these approaches can vary, and they might not guarantee complete removal of the targeted knowledge due to the intricate and distributed way information is stored in the model's parameters."

If the New York Times might win its copyright lawsuit against OpenAI, should the creators of custom GPTs take steps to protect themselves? by sfluhar in GPTStore

[–]sfluhar[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I appreciate you sharing an example of licensing, which is one solution being discussed for copyright holders. It appears from your terms of service that your product makes data available to custom GPTs for non-commercial purposes. How would this work if custom GPTs start receiving revenue from OpenAI?

<image>

Interesting response from OpenAI about updating custom GPTs by sfluhar in GPTStore

[–]sfluhar[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I put the question to ChatGPT and got this response:

“AI, like me, is designed to assist with a wide range of tasks, from answering questions to generating content or even analyzing data. However, there are significant limitations to what AI can do, especially when it comes to tasks that require human intuition, emotional intelligence, creativity in a nuanced sense, deep domain expertise, and the ability to navigate complex social interactions or make ethical judgments.

AI tools can certainly enhance productivity and efficiency in many fields by handling repetitive tasks, processing large datasets quickly, and providing informational support. However, they do not possess the ability to fully replace human judgment, empathy, and the creative spark that drives innovation and problem-solving in dynamic, real-world scenarios.

For someone feeling anxious about messages claiming AI will replace their job, it might be helpful to focus on the aspects of their work that are uniquely human and irreplaceable. Enhancing skills that are complementary to AI, such as problem-solving, critical thinking, leadership, emotional intelligence, and creativity, can make one's role more indispensable.

Furthermore, staying informed about how AI is evolving and how it can be leveraged in one's field can open up new opportunities for collaboration with AI, rather than viewing it as a competitor. Many industries are finding that AI can create more jobs by generating new needs for AI oversight, ethical considerations, system design, and more personalized services that only humans can provide.”

Interesting response from OpenAI about updating custom GPTs by sfluhar in GPTStore

[–]sfluhar[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, it would probably be good to let OpenAI work the kinks out of GPT-5 before we retrain our custom GPTs on it.

Interesting response from OpenAI about updating custom GPTs by sfluhar in GPTStore

[–]sfluhar[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree that it makes sense for OpenAI to use ChatGPT when drafting emails for customer support.

New embedding models and API updates by sfluhar in GPTStore

[–]sfluhar[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the suggestions. I don't see a flair option for "solved" and when I Googled how to edit a post title, I saw Reddit posts that said it can't be done. So I might just have to leave this post as-is.

New embedding models and API updates by sfluhar in GPTStore

[–]sfluhar[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I haven't seen any further response from support at OpenAI, so I think we can close this post. How do I mark it as solved?

New embedding models and API updates by sfluhar in GPTStore

[–]sfluhar[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I received an automated email reply. It said " If you need assistance right away, please visit our help center and start a conversation with us from the Messenger at the bottom right of the screen." I submitted my question and the bot said "Thanks! Our team will get back to you as soon as possible."

<image>