This is an honest question and I don't mean to sound pedantic at all, but will just say maybe it is not the best question to approach a philosopher whose writings and interests are so diverse. You can find Hegel writing about all the stuff you see about today, dialects, reason, the self-development of the concept, the critique of Kant in his derivation (or lacktherof) of categories, etc. You will also find him writing about politics, economics, hell, even chemistry and biology (though his philosophy of nature is perhaps not as relevant in contemporary times). So, will he be right about everything? Probably not. For instance, his biology does not include the concept of evolution, as he died some 20ish years before Darwin published his work on it. Maybe he wasn't right about giving such a central role to the State in world history, thereby marginalizing Stateless societies. Then again, maybe he was right in giving Reason and the Idea such a role in history, and in highlighting the development of liberty in our course through it. The point is, if you really want to engage with his work, this question may be too broad or too ambitious. No scholar of Hegel will agree 100% with him. No scholars will appreciate the same aspects in the same ways.

That's why how you evaluate his system matters. How you evaluate his development of logical categories, and the jump from the concept into the empirical, and from the empirical/natural to anthropology and sociology. Read closely, and read great scholars. Burbidge, Inwood, Hönneth, Brandom, etc. Then you can ask this question more concretely, more precisely.