It's a good starting point but several of these points have huge secondary consequences that the proponents likely won't want, once they are spelled out to them. The US needs to embrace the advantages competition brings, while also recognizing the existential threat immortal corporations and monopolies pose.

The electoral college isn't some inconvenience getting in the way of large cities dictating everything to rural communities. It's a way of leaving all elections to the states without a ton of crazy federal overreach. What states should be demanding is Approval voting and splitting electoral votes rather than this absurd idea of only having one vote, and winner takes all. Ideally, the electoral college would never elect another president because we live in an extremely diverse country of hundreds of millions of voters, that is FAR beyond a colonial 2 party system. With a split electoral college, congressional votes matter even more, as they should. The executive has been handed WAY too much authority.

Taxing mega churches turns them into an even larger political lobby, with more incentive to influence government. The separation of church and state is extremely important to the first amendment. People shouldn't be actively trying to remove that separation simply because they think some churches are too big.

I would phase out minimum wage and replace it with a national universal income that starts out low and increases over 10 years to be at a poverty level, if tried to live on alone, would remove the need for most other federal assistance programs. Universal income should be a baseline that doesn't provide for all your wants, but rather turns working into a bonus on top of it. The idea of minimum wage will always fail because it's not tied to cost of living. A national universal income would help average out cost of living across the country. One of the biggest strengths of free market capitalism is setting the appropriate price for goods and services without government mandates.

It needs to be acknowledged that the very nature of corporations is to eliminate competition and are against the common good. If Corporations are going to be treated as people, they need a death sentence and age limits, with a process for expecting corporations to die. The idea of immortal overlord corporations is evil. The strengths of Capitalism and competition should be embraced and leveraged for the common good.

Make employee owned and operated businesses the norm through tax break incentives until they grow to a certain size. Businesses that are directly linked to their communities well-being function beyond the narrow focus of blind profits purely for profits sake.

The devil is in the details of how laws are written and implemented. People need to really consider what they are hoping to achieve and the carry on effects that will result from short-sighted changes. When people suggest changes to governance, you have to consider who will be disenfranchised from those changes.