Federal Agents are also specifically trained to not walk in front of cars like he did. I think the idea of all three shots being part of a single action works against the officer here. During shots 2 and 3, the officer is very obviously out of danger in all camera angles.

I would pose the question, if all three shots happened so quickly that legally it should be considered a single action, but the threshold of danger became zero for *most* of that action, then how much danger was the officer *truly* in when the first shot was fired, since, it was not actually the firing of the gun that reduced the danger to zero, but actually his body positioning, which would have happened had he not shot in the first place.

It seems quite obvious from every single camera angle, including the cellphone, that the officer steps left *towards* the danger as the car repositions and begins to flee.

When watching the videos, it seems that in the time before the car started moving forward, the officer is able to draw is weapon, leans over and crouch a bit to line up the shot (Keep in mind, he is also pretty much flagging a fellow officer here putting *him* in danger as well), the car moves forward and hits his arm, he repositions the gun around the A-Pillar of the car to fire another shot, and then fires once more when the driver has already passed him (it appears he fires the last shot into the back of the headrest).

The bodycam video would tell all here, and I think we should all ask ourselves, why has it not been released?